Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

User Profile

Collapse

Profile Sidebar

Collapse
Profile Picture
Sudy11
Member
Last Activity: 20-06-2018, 11:07 AM
Joined: 04-06-2018
Location:
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
  • Source
Clear All
new posts

  • Thanks for the reply.

    So the contradiction is there, or I would rather say an omission about the case where the Lessor has received the money from the insurance but he is not able to rebuild/reinstate the property for some reason not mentioned.
    So as per this lease tenants might not...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Is it because there is a contradiction ?
    Since under the Lessor’s agreement it does say that the lessor has to rebuild and reinstate the building forthwith the money received from the insurance.
    Should the landlord be asked to clarify these points before...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Thanks for the response !
    I am evaluating a statement in the lease (for the purpose of buying a flat) and awaiting a decision of a solicitor around the same...
    As with other leases where there are covenants on the Lesse, Lessor and the management company.
    The lease I am evaluating...
    See more | Go to post

    Leave a comment:


  • Sudy11
    started a topic Lease - Level of detail to be covered

    Lease - Level of detail to be covered

    Hello All !
    W.r.t a lease hold property and the obligations of the lessor in case of damage or destruction to the property by an insured risk (fire, earthquake etc.) , to what extent should the lease document cover the various scenarios around Lessors responsibility in rebuilding the property...
    See more | Go to post
No activity results to display
Show More
Working...
X