User Profile

[KTC]

Well, tomorrow is actually 24th and not 23rd.

Any date more than two months after deemed service of the notice is fine. What does your tenancy agreement say about when notice is deemed to have been served?

[KTC]

As in you went here and downloaded the form under "Section 21 Notice - Periodic s21(4)(a) with Guide Notes" ?

If so, that's not valid notice in England due to changes in legislations. You need to try again, but this time with Form 6A from gov.uk that I linked to earlier. Notice...

[KTC]

Can you confirm that the tenancy is assured shorthold?

Did you use Form 6A?

Is the tenancy in a fixed term, or is it a periodic tenancy?

If a periodic tenancy, is it a contractual or statutory periodic tenancy? What is the period of the tenancy?

Are...

[KTC]

You can't just interpret a contractual clause to mean something it doesn't say because you don't like what it does say.

A tenancy agreement is a contract between the landlord and tenant. It sets out what you agree to, rights & obligations etc. It applies to both parties. Residential...

[KTC]

Nah, the language used isn't the same for the GSC and the EPC. Landlords should be fine. But yeah, not relevant here.



No one here can be sure, since we're not the judge that's going to rule on it if and when you go to court. Having said that, read for yourself:

...

[KTC]

Don't worry about it.

No one is occupying, and you're doing works that involve modification to related appliances, you must be allowed to finish the works before checking if the works is safe. Just make sure a copy is done and given before the tenant reoccupy.

[KTC]

I don't think such arguments has any chance of success. In the Limitation Act, there's special provisions allowing limitation periods to be postponed or reset, such as postponement in the case of fraud, concealment or mistake. If the Act specially say when a limitation is postponed until discovery (or...

[KTC]

The Limitation Act period for recovery of "any sum recoverable by virtue of any enactment" is six years. The problem is when does that six years start. It is commonly assumed that the six years start from the deadline when the protection and PI requirements must be met, so the October 2013...

[KTC]

There must be authorities for what "substantially the same" mean given I don't think this is the only place in landlord and tenant law where the phase appears, but I couldn't find any through a quick Google.

Speculating, a lease for a property including land (i.e. not a flat),...

[KTC]

As others have said, they're either tenant or they're not. If no tenants still live in the property as their only or principal home, AND the partners are girlfriends and not wives, then tenancy is no longer assured and you can serve notice to quit if tenancy is periodic. The notice is to the tenant,...

[KTC]

March 2012 assuming the LA screwed up as well.

Likewise for October 2012.

January 2013 wasn't a new tenancy, so wouldn't be an additional penalty to October 2012, also the requirements didn't apply anew. A penalty could had been applied for that the deposit was no longer where...

[KTC]

Was that at the start of the periodic tenancy, or some time after?



That would possibly make it worse if we're talking about a deposit that was protected at the start of a tenancy but PI wasn't given. Either return the depost or give the PI. If you are only talking about the...

[KTC]

The OP's posts apart from the very first one that started the thread have all disappeared.

[KTC]

^^^^^^^^^^...

[KTC]

Then she almost certainly is or will be your tenant of the existing tenancy.

She's

1) a joint tenant under survivorship so is now the sole tenant of the tenancy,
2) the tenancy in its fixed term, she inherited it as his spouse, or
3) the tenancy is periodic, and...

[KTC]

Signing reciept of a document does not create a contract. ...

[KTC]

If you're so worried, you just have to get the applicant to provide you with the details required along with permission to use it for a tenant reference check, and then make the check yourself with those details instead of getting an applicant to submit it directly.

[KTC]

STOP communicating directly with the tenant if they are accusing you of a criminal offence. Talk to a solicitor, like, ASAP.



Yes. Get an agent or a solicitor to do it on your behalf if I were you....

[KTC]

Erm no.

The whole point of a public forum is that discussion takes place publicly. You can (and should) anonymise any personal details so you can't be identified, but private discussion defeats the ability for others from learning from a discussion, and for posters to correct any incorrect...

[KTC]

I meant the article arguing that it would prohibit tenant referencing because the prospective tenants argreeing with the website terms create a contract.