If a company providing a service is NOT VAT registered can VAT still be charged?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    If a company providing a service is NOT VAT registered can VAT still be charged?

    My Mum (aged 78) rents out a small property in Hampshire. She rents it out via a letting agent - the income she receives is effectively her pension. I have noted that the letting agent she uses charges VAT on all services and fees. I recently noted that she was being charged for VAT by the agent for a service provided by a company who are NOT registered for VAT. For example the agency has charged her for resetting the valves on the flat's gas boiler. The company that re-set the valves is not registered for VAT, however the invoice sent to my Mother by the letting agent includes VAT.

    Is this normal? Is this fair? It seems to me that the letting agent would be gaining if they charged the Landlord VAT, but were not being charged it by the service providers.

    I know nothing about VAT and am just trying to protect an OAP.

    #2
    Yes, if you are a VAT registered business you have to charge VAT on services provided - regardless of whether or not beneficiary is VAT registered. same way as VAt is charged on clothes, food & drink etc (you just dont necessarily see it broken down on price tag).

    The problem here is that if the company doing the repair had charged your mum directly (as they arent registered) VAT would not be charged. The letting agent is obviously taking a cut & as is VAT registered has to charge it on total cost to your mum. The letting agent doesnt benefit from the VAT part as this is paid in full to HMRC. Your mum however has had a double hit & would be better dealing with repairs herself!

    Comment


      #3
      The agent is right.

      If a company is VAT registered it has to charge VAT on its invoices (some companies have a VAT company version and a non-VAT company to work round the issue).
      What it can't do is recover the input VAT in this case, so the VAT they will pay is all of the 20% VAT that they charge - they aren't any better off as a result.

      Essentially your mother is buying the valve resetting from the agent (who, in turn, buys the service from someone else.)

      Obviously it's a bit of a pain, and, if the circumstances were different it might be an argument for not doing things via an agent if possible.
      The VAT is allowable as an expense against income tax, so HMRC don't win everything.
      When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
      Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

      Comment


        #4
        Thanks for your replies.

        I understand the situation now - re VAT registered companies.

        Is this still the case when the agent is not registered - they have no VAT registration number and have left it blank on all her invoices. Yet they are charging her (my Mum) VAT for their services (Management Fees) plus the services of others (re-setting gad valves). Neither companies are VAT registered - and obviously neither is my Mum. (I am worried they are just taking the VAT and keeping it).

        Comment


          #5
          They should treat work done by contractors who were instructed on behalf of your mum as disbursements and thus they should not charge VAT on top but rather pass on the amount invoiced by the contractor (which may already include VAT if the contractor is VAT-registered).

          Ask them why they don't do that.

          If they are not VAT-registered then they cannot obviously charge VAT at all, and in fact I believe that charging "VAT" will then be an offence.

          Comment


            #6
            A VAT invoice has to have the VAT registration number of the seller to be a valid invoice (unless it's a special "modified" version which can't apply here).
            It can't be blank.

            If the agent is not VAT registered, charging VAT is a) a fraud and b) going to get them into a lot of trouble.
            When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
            Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

            Comment


              #7
              We are VAT registered but the inventory clerk we use is not. We have never charged VAT on his invoices and our accountant has signed this practice off for years. Apparently it would be different if we marked up the invoices but as we don't there is not an issue. I hope this is correct as if its not I will owe thousands....

              Comment


                #8
                Sorry I thought the agent was VAT registered, hence additional charge to you. If they are VAT registered as said before they must provide VAT reg. on invoices. Maybe check with HMRC National helpline to see if they can check if company is VAT registered. Telephone: 0300 200 3300. If not they can maybe take over from you in the investigation!

                Comment


                  #9
                  If you are simply passing the invoices on and the inventory clerk is paid directly, that sounds fine.
                  As a rule, if you are VAT registered all of your own invoices have to be VAT invoices.
                  When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
                  Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by seabug View Post
                    My Mum (aged 78) rents out a small property in Hampshire. She rents it out via a letting agent - the income she receives is effectively her pension. I have noted that the letting agent she uses charges VAT on all services and fees. I recently noted that she was being charged for VAT by the agent for a service provided by a company who are NOT registered for VAT. For example the agency has charged her for resetting the valves on the flat's gas boiler. The company that re-set the valves is not registered for VAT, however the invoice sent to my Mother by the letting agent includes VAT.

                    Is this normal? Is this fair? It seems to me that the letting agent would be gaining if they charged the Landlord VAT, but were not being charged it by the service providers.

                    I know nothing about VAT and am just trying to protect an OAP.
                    If neither the letting agent nor the gas fitter are VAT registered, then this is fraud by the letting agent, pure and simple.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Goobs27 View Post
                      We are VAT registered but the inventory clerk we use is not. We have never charged VAT on his invoices and our accountant has signed this practice off for years. Apparently it would be different if we marked up the invoices but as we don't there is not an issue. I hope this is correct as if its not I will owe thousands....
                      Yes it's correct. As mentioned above these are disbursements.

                      You pass on the invoice including any VAT.

                      If you add VAT yourselves then you should pass on the invoice minus any VAT (which you will claim back).

                      Comment

                      Latest Activity

                      Collapse

                      • Reply to Caught out by changes to Capital Gains Tax
                        by reluctantlandlord1976
                        Hi Andrew
                        First of all I've got an initial appointment to speak to an accountant on Friday!

                        Can I just check where you write ' ...at death 1/6th of the value of the whole would have been deemed to pass to you for CGT purposes as the survivors would share the whole'.

                        Does...
                        08-12-2021, 18:02 PM
                      • Reply to Caught out by changes to Capital Gains Tax
                        by jpkeates
                        Even if probate wasn't mandatory, it would probably have been useful.
                        08-12-2021, 13:44 PM
                      • Caught out by changes to Capital Gains Tax
                        by reluctantlandlord1976
                        I appreciate 'ignorance' is no excuse, however there are some mitigating factors, i.e. due to illness etc.

                        1. Previous family home rented out - terrible tenants - left owing rent, bad repairs etc. [usual story for some] subsequently property not let for 2 years for a number of reasons while...
                        06-12-2021, 13:51 PM
                      • Reply to Caught out by changes to Capital Gains Tax
                        by AndrewDod
                        Yes this would be the case if it was jointly owned (not as tenants in common). The situation would be that at death 1/6th of the value of the whole would have been deemed to pass to you (for CGT purposes), as the survivors would share the whole.

                        So for the 3 periods you would be taken...
                        08-12-2021, 12:51 PM
                      • Reply to Caught out by changes to Capital Gains Tax
                        by reluctantlandlord1976
                        jpkeates
                        There was no estate as such, property jointly owned - they were both retired at time of purchase living on small pensions, hence I bought with them so they could stay in the home they'd been renting from council from early 1950s to March 1982 at time of purchase. And I paid for the initial...
                        08-12-2021, 10:50 AM
                      • Reply to Caught out by changes to Capital Gains Tax
                        by jpkeates
                        I don't know the historic thresholds, but it's bizarre that there's no probate for both of your parents, their estate has to be tiny for that to be possible nowadays.
                        It's probably too late for HMRC to do anything about that, but that process sets the values for CGT calculations later on, so it's...
                        08-12-2021, 10:28 AM
                      • Reply to Caught out by changes to Capital Gains Tax
                        by reluctantlandlord1976
                        Morning Andrew
                        Thanks for your response early this morning and clarifying I have to make three separate calculations [the split wasn't clear on the CGT calculator].
                        I understand the query on the value but this is an ex council house on a council estate [I feel I have to defend it here as...
                        08-12-2021, 08:45 AM
                      • Reply to Caught out by changes to Capital Gains Tax
                        by AndrewDod
                        As gordon indicates you need to consider it in three entirely separate parts, each have their own gain and calculation --

                        The part YOU owned before Death 1
                        The part YOU owned between Death 1 and Death 2
                        The part you owned after Death 2

                        Based on the values you give...
                        08-12-2021, 05:52 AM
                      • Reply to Caught out by changes to Capital Gains Tax
                        by reluctantlandlord1976
                        Thank you Gordon, didn't see your response this afternoon. I will look at this with fresh eyes tomorrow as it's late now.
                        I've put some figures in my reply to a post just now but answers below to your questions.

                        a] £80k Jan 2021 sale price.
                        b] As property purchased before...
                        08-12-2021, 00:55 AM
                      • Reply to Caught out by changes to Capital Gains Tax
                        by reluctantlandlord1976
                        Andrew, apologies only just seen your post [was it awaiting approval did you say?] answers are:

                        Purchased March 1982 as joint tenancy - so equal split of 33 1/3% each party
                        Parent 2 died September 2007 - as joint tenancy I inherited their share - so at this point I own 100% of property...
                        08-12-2021, 00:41 AM
                      Working...
                      X