Sold house - CGT calculation

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Sold house - CGT calculation

    I boughts a house in April 01 for £425,000 and sold it in July 07 for £688,509.
    I did however loose my job during these times so had to move out and rent a cheaper place for myself for a while and rent out my house.
    If i moved out and rented a place myself and rented out my house, does that mean it is still classed as my PPR as i did not own any other property? I therefore dont need to worry about CGT. I assume this is not the case and that a CGT calculation still needs to be done.

    My dates are: 87months broken down as follows:
    April 01 - August 01 - Lived there - 5 months
    Sep 01 - August 03 - Rented out - 36 months
    Sep 03 - Feb 05 - Lived there - 18 months
    March 05 - July 07 - Rented out - 28 months

    Any help on a rough calcualtion would be appriciated.

    #2
    There is something wrong with your months
    Sep 01 - August 03 - Rented out - 36 months is not 36 but 23
    You have hit the maximum Letting Relief of £40,000 per owner. This is available on the assumption that you declared the rental income to HMRC each year. I need your gross salary for that FY year of sale but have assumed you are a higher rate tax payer and the sole owner. :

    Capital Gains Summary

    Purchase Price £425,000 14/04/2001
    Indexation 0.000 £425,000
    Legal Fees £0
    Sale Price £688,509 14/07/2007
    Enhancements £0
    Legal Fees £0
    Gross Gain £263,509
    PPR Relief £210,095 £53,414
    Letting Relief £40,000 £13,414
    Taper Relief 20% £10,731
    CG Allow'ce 1 £9,200 £1,531
    CG Bill £612

    This tax is due to be paid by thend of January. Tomorrow.

    However if you tell me the Legal costs of acquisition and stamp duty and the sales and legal fees, these are all deductible and may wipe out the tax.
    Regards Peter

    Comment


      #3
      Thanks for your help and yes HRT payer.

      Sorry about the 36 months, yes it should be 23 shouldnt it.

      74 months broken down as:
      April 01 - August 01 - Lived there - 5 months
      Sep 01 - August 03 - Rented out - 23 months
      Sep 03 - Feb 05 - Lived there - 18 months
      March 05 - July 07 - Rented out - 28 months

      Just so i understand, i realise the last 36 months are exempt and you have worked out the total exempt period of 59 months (36 + 18 + 5).

      How come the 36 months can overlap the previous 18 when i lived there. E.G, i would have expected it to be 36 + 10 + 5. The 10 arising as 8 of the last months is alredy included in part of the 18 month period.

      Comment


        #4
        The expression 'last 36 months is treated' is just that, an expression. In practice your are entitled to the full 36 months. I have had the letting relief questioned when the last 38 months is treated as residential so LR would not be allowed but they accepted that it had genuinely been there home and they accepted it. In your case even if we deduct 8 months from the letting period, you have not dropped under the max £40,000 so it does not effect the tax due. Regards Peter

        Comment


          #5
          One of the old IR booklets used to show that "overlap" of LR and the final 36 months exemption was claimable.

          IMHO, that is wrong and HMRC have withdrawn that booklet!

          Comment


            #6
            I recall that old bboklet and in this case the overlap reduction does not make any difference so the OP's CGT is the same. Regards Peter

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by TaxationPete View Post
              The expression 'last 36 months is treated' is just that, an expression. In practice your are entitled to the full 36 months. I have had the letting relief questioned when the last 38 months is treated as residential so LR would not be allowed but they accepted that it had genuinely been there home and they accepted it. In your case even if we deduct 8 months from the letting period, you have not dropped under the max £40,000 so it does not effect the tax due. Regards Peter
              I am getting it now, just!

              What i mean is that it would effect the PPR not the letting relief.

              Total gain x period of occupation/total period of ownership
              £263,509 x 59 / 74 = £210,095

              But i was just trying to get my head around why it should not be:
              £263,509 x 51 / 74 = £181,607

              I am not questioning you, it would just be nice to understand it correctly.

              The period of occupation i am getting confused about as why it should not be 51 as if you get the last 36 months automatically, this eats into the actual period of occupation of 18 months between Sep 03 - Feb 05. Therefore, as this eats into the 18 months by 8 months, it only leaves 10 left of the actual occupation.
              So 5 + 10 + 36

              Sorry if i am being stupid!

              Comment


                #8
                How many months did you actual live in the property 51 or 59. Easy. The complication comes when some moves in at the end of ownership and lives there for say 12 months to qualify the property as their PPR, they are then granted PPR but staying any longer does not change the PPR calculation as they are living in the property during the 36 months exemption. Regards Peter

                Comment


                  #9
                  To explain further now I have a few minures. You can not overlap Residence wilth Letting Relief Any period of residence wether actual or the 36 months exemption is deemed to be as if you are resident so ther e is no LR during the last 36 months. In your case assuming no null periods once you had started letting, you had 1552 days let however due to the last 36 months only 481 qualified for LR which maxed out at £40,000. I hope that sorts it for you. Regards Peter
                  Last edited by TaxationPete; 31-01-2009, 14:05 PM. Reason: typo

                  Comment

                  Latest Activity

                  Collapse

                  • transfer title or deed of trust regarding CGT reduction
                    neilm
                    Hi All
                    I am selling a BTL which is currently in my name only. In order to reduce the CGT would I need to transfer the title to include my wife or would a deed of trust suffice?
                    08-02-2019, 09:32 AM
                  • Reply to transfer title or deed of trust regarding CGT reduction
                    jpkeates
                    There are a number of different types of trust.

                    One that owns property usually has to be formally recorded with HMRC as a separate entity and has to submit its own tax return annually.
                    A simple trust to change the beneficial ownership is a different type of trust, which simply requires...
                    20-03-2019, 15:35 PM
                  • Repairs to property and tax
                    themanlike
                    Hi there,

                    I am new, but have been referred here as a good place to get advice on everything Landlord related.

                    Does anyone have any advice on the below, please?

                    I and two others own a leasehold flat each in a converted building (big house)
                    We are also directors...
                    20-03-2019, 11:31 AM
                  • Reply to Repairs to property and tax
                    themanlike
                    Thank you, that provides more clarity - appreciate it. I will review my lease and come back with further info.

                    Many thanks
                    20-03-2019, 14:12 PM
                  • Reply to Repairs to property and tax
                    leaseholder64
                    With a normal lease, the money would not appear on the company balance sheet, so would not be visible to Companies House. It would be held under a statutory trust (L&T 1978 s42) and any interest would be taxed at discretionary trust rates (currently nil where the the tax would otherwise be less...
                    20-03-2019, 14:04 PM
                  • Reply to Repairs to property and tax
                    themanlike
                    Thank you for your response, I appreciate it.

                    Let me correct myself when I say nominal - that number is calculated based on long terms works that need doing on the property (painting in the communal areas), and ongoing maintenance (gardener, cleaner - for communal areas). We never keep...
                    20-03-2019, 13:27 PM
                  • Reply to transfer title or deed of trust regarding CGT reduction
                    AndrewDod
                    There is no such law or rule in general (for example with a DoT giving beneficial ownership to my child).

                    Indeed such a rule would make no sense since one can have only four trustees, but many more owners than that. The ruling relates to ownership (which the DoT is). What is the case is...
                    20-03-2019, 12:54 PM
                  • Reply to Repairs to property and tax
                    leaseholder64
                    I think you have rather more problems than just tax!

                    You cannot charge a nominal service charge. The service charge needs to be based on realistic estimates of the cost of doing those things that the the lease requires the freeholder to do, and under and overestimates should be corrected...
                    20-03-2019, 12:05 PM
                  • Reply to transfer title or deed of trust regarding CGT reduction
                    Little Rabbit
                    Gordon999. Sorry, I am on my phone and struggling to copy and paste from your post above. But where is your source please to say that HMRC want to see both spouses' names on the title before they will accept a DoT which varies the distribution of rental income? I can't see anything which says this...
                    20-03-2019, 09:22 AM
                  • Reply to transfer title or deed of trust regarding CGT reduction
                    Gordon999
                    A Deed of Trust may be sufficient for you and your solicitor.

                    But it seems a single name in the property title + DOT is not enough to satisfy HMRC under " their rules ".

                    HMRC want to see both spouses names registered on the property title before they accept...
                    19-03-2019, 13:08 PM
                  Working...
                  X