Question on SDLT liability

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Question on SDLT liability


    I am looking at releasing a 50% share of my residential property.
    Its currently classed as my prime residence. But I want to get some cash out of it, clear borrowing, and run it as a joint venture BTL.
    Would the in-coming investor be liable for sdlt?
    Its not a huge issue if they are, it just affects the yield proposal.
    I'm just wondering how their investment would be considered for sdlt purposes?
    Are they considered to be buying and they are liable?
    Or would it be an investment and there's simply a legal arrangement that 50% of the rental and 50% of future sale proceeds are distributed to the investor?
    Or could it be considered only as an exchange now? I may sell other 50% in 1-2y - so a delayed completion when sdlt would be liable??

    To confuse issues a bit further - I created a small annexe out of the original plot.
    2 new leases have been legally created/ prepared for Land Reg - the annexe on one lease and the main property on another lease.
    The idea was to sell the main property and to move into the annexe - ownership will remain in my name, just on the revised lease.
    This idea has now been amended to not sell the main property and instead to relinquish 50% on this investor/BTL proposal.
    I am just not sure of whether releasing 50% will be considered a purchase for his sdlt purposes or not??
    I do still intend to live in the annexe. Although I may rent that out too...

    I do have a loan that needs clearing.
    I may still juggle my finances and take out a BTL mortgage on (my share of) the main property.

    Aside from all this juggling - would I be liable for cgt?

    Grateful for fine tuning advice on this... Many thanks

    Selling half of the property is a sale and comprises a CGT and SDLT "event".
    So, depending on the value, they'll be due.

    The incoming purchaser is a buyer, same as any other buyer.

    You'll struggle to get lending on a jointly owned property (I'd say conventional BTL lending would be impossible).

    You would have to look at how the properties have been "split". From the sound of it, the freehold is as it was, and you have two leases that you intend to register (one for each property).
    Whats the incoming investor buying, part of the freehold or one or some of the leases?
    When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
    Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).


      Yes - FH remaining under both new leases, each new one to be registered.
      Incoming investor will have 50% share of one new lease.
      The intention is short-term rental and then sell.
      So if investor pays SDLT for a share now and we then sell the whole property in 1-2y, hmrc gets 50% of the SDLT twice?
      Hmm. That doesn't seem fair/ correct?

      So would it be better to have an agreement to sell to the investor and the 50% is considered exchange, with a long delayed completion. Then we sell/ complete the whole property to a different 3rd party who pays all the SDLT at that point? And between now and that completion the property is rented?

      Is there anything improper in that course of action?

      Reading post #2 - is there a different way round an investor coming in? So it's not actually considered a purchase for the purposes of SDLT?
      Just thinking - if the investment partially cleared an existing loan, as if it was an assignment of the debt and the investor had a legal charge over that debt - would that be feasible instead of the investment being called a 'purchase' ?
      I would still need to have a loan - but it would be re-assigning the rest of current debt to a new BTL loan, simultaneously as the investor invested. Or it's all academic and however I try to work this, it will always be classed as a "purchase"??


        Post #2 also mentions cgt liability.
        The property has been prime residence for a long while. And I only intend to rent short term. Isn't there an exempt period for CGT? Like the last 18 months of your ownership?

        I intend to movie into the annexe which was under same ownership and lease for a long while - it will be just a case of shrinking the old lease rather than a brand new lease - if that makes sense. The part of which I intend to have an investor involved, rent and then sell will be a brand new lease. If I sold within the time period allowed by hmrc to sell old property and moving into new property, would I be exempt from CGT?
        Just trying to get my head round all the implications of what I would like' to do.


          If the incoming investor is buying 50% share of property then he will pay SDLT on the purchase, no way round that legally unless the investor is happy to not have his interests registered.


            Originally posted by HP mum View Post
            Reading post #2 - is there a different way round an investor coming in? So it's not actually considered a purchase for the purposes of SDLT?
            To avoid ADLT you would need to have no purchase.
            So the investment could be a loan or some other transaction not associated with the property.
            Or a trust of some kind.

            But the risks are that you are creating a mechanism for the sole purpose of not paying some tax.
            HMRC doesn't like that and most loopholes have been closed over time.
            When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
            Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).


              1. What does the annexe include ? a separate leasehold ( 999 years and no ground rent ) studio flat with bathroom ?

              2. When you sell a half share of property to another party , you may not get 50% of the market value - may be getting only 45% of price . You would be better off getting a 50% mortgage loan and keeping the entire property under your OWN name until you sell out completely. Why do you want to rent out for 2 years before selling because a no-deal brexit may hurt every property owner. ? .

              3. If you do find someone to buy first 50% of the property, then when you come to sell the other 50% interest, you will have to sell cheap to existing partner because there is no market for half share except at dirt cheap price.


                At the moment there is just one lease; one FH.

                An annexe has been created internally (bed/bath/living+ parking - like a flat above garage). I simply need to change the access point so the annexe has independent access.

                Lawyers created 2 new leases, each with small Ground Rent payable, for the purposes of selling one part/Title - neither registered yet; just prepared.

                But with the sales market slow - I have reconsidered to rent one or both parts out. (After a bit of light refub on the annexe).

                The Title could remain as one lease - apart from the annexe needs a postal address for anyone to live in it (as til now it was part of the larger plot). Can I get a new postal address without registering Title at Land Registry?

                And if I find an investor, it may be a bit messy with % share if the Title remains on the original lease. The idea was to offer % share on one part only; the annexe part remains 100% in my name. But perhaps lawyers can resolve simply with a legal agreement on the % and to what it relates??

                The issue I have is that I wanted to get money out via a sale. That hasn't happened. So I am looking at alternatives. I won't get a loan on my own, but will with investment as the ltv improves.

                I understand its confusing. Its a good idea; just hard to action in reality...


                  Update on this query:
                  I finally have a buyer :-) which negates any kind of other investment juggling and concerns about sdlt or cgt... Thank heavens.
                  Although it is not a simple sale and is raising other questions on how to structure the exchange/ completion process.... which I am raising elsewhere on the forums.
                  Why can't life be less complicated?!


                  Latest Activity


                  • transfer title or deed of trust regarding CGT reduction
                    Hi All
                    I am selling a BTL which is currently in my name only. In order to reduce the CGT would I need to transfer the title to include my wife or would a deed of trust suffice?
                    08-02-2019, 09:32 AM
                  • Reply to transfer title or deed of trust regarding CGT reduction
                    So is it possible to use a dot to transfer beneficial ownership to ones spouse who is not named on the legal title? I was under the impression that this couldn't be done. Would the mortgage company not block such a thing?
                    21-03-2019, 23:08 PM
                  • Reply to transfer title or deed of trust regarding CGT reduction
                    There are a number of different types of trust.

                    One that owns property usually has to be formally recorded with HMRC as a separate entity and has to submit its own tax return annually.
                    A simple trust to change the beneficial ownership is a different type of trust, which simply requires...
                    20-03-2019, 15:35 PM
                  • Repairs to property and tax
                    Hi there,

                    I am new, but have been referred here as a good place to get advice on everything Landlord related.

                    Does anyone have any advice on the below, please?

                    I and two others own a leasehold flat each in a converted building (big house)
                    We are also directors...
                    20-03-2019, 11:31 AM
                  • Reply to Repairs to property and tax
                    Thank you, that provides more clarity - appreciate it. I will review my lease and come back with further info.

                    Many thanks
                    20-03-2019, 14:12 PM
                  • Reply to Repairs to property and tax
                    With a normal lease, the money would not appear on the company balance sheet, so would not be visible to Companies House. It would be held under a statutory trust (L&T 1978 s42) and any interest would be taxed at discretionary trust rates (currently nil where the the tax would otherwise be less...
                    20-03-2019, 14:04 PM
                  • Reply to Repairs to property and tax
                    Thank you for your response, I appreciate it.

                    Let me correct myself when I say nominal - that number is calculated based on long terms works that need doing on the property (painting in the communal areas), and ongoing maintenance (gardener, cleaner - for communal areas). We never keep...
                    20-03-2019, 13:27 PM
                  • Reply to transfer title or deed of trust regarding CGT reduction
                    There is no such law or rule in general (for example with a DoT giving beneficial ownership to my child).

                    Indeed such a rule would make no sense since one can have only four trustees, but many more owners than that. The ruling relates to ownership (which the DoT is). What is the case is...
                    20-03-2019, 12:54 PM
                  • Reply to Repairs to property and tax
                    I think you have rather more problems than just tax!

                    You cannot charge a nominal service charge. The service charge needs to be based on realistic estimates of the cost of doing those things that the the lease requires the freeholder to do, and under and overestimates should be corrected...
                    20-03-2019, 12:05 PM
                  • Reply to transfer title or deed of trust regarding CGT reduction
                    Little Rabbit
                    Gordon999. Sorry, I am on my phone and struggling to copy and paste from your post above. But where is your source please to say that HMRC want to see both spouses' names on the title before they will accept a DoT which varies the distribution of rental income? I can't see anything which says this...
                    20-03-2019, 09:22 AM