SDLT impact of varying ownership % of jointly held with spouse mortgaged property

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    SDLT impact of varying ownership % of jointly held with spouse mortgaged property

    Hi All

    I've been through many of the historic posts but haven't found a clear answer to this point (but happy to be pointed in the right direction).

    I jointly hold a mortgaged investment property with my wife, 50/50 as joint tenants and both on the BTL mortgage. 50% of the current mortgage value is above the SDLT threshold and so this is a matter of applicability of the consideration provisions for SDLT.

    I would like to move 49% of the beneficial interest to my wife (lower tax rate) through re-registering as tenants in common and entering in to a DoT to formalise this (and Form 17 to notify HMRC of the change). Giving a 99/1% split in ownership and income. I appreciate that my mortgage provider may have a view on this.

    The DoT would seek to clarify that only the net equity interest is being gifted, however, is there an implicit presumption or other mechanism by which HMRC would deem there to be consideration passing for this change of ownership (and thus bringing in the issue of SDLT)? As I see it, we would both remain jointly responsible for the full mortgage due on the property and the change in ownership percentage would not impact this (therefore no consideration and no SDLT). Clearly as a second property and with the additional 3% this becomes more of a material matter to get right.

    Does anyone have any experience of this matter? I will probably seek a steer from HMRC or professional advice but wanted to canvass views first.

    Many thanks in advance for any assistance.

    If you + wife are registered as "joint tenants" at Land Registry , the Tax Office will automatically assume that each "joint tenant" is entitle to 50% of the rental income.

    You can change the distribution of income to 1%: 99% by producing a "Declaration of Trust" and informing HMRC by Form 17 within 60 days of signing the DOT.

    You should seek advice from a solicitor before proceeding. As far as I know, you are staying registered as "joint tenants" i.e no change to property title and no sdlt to pay.


      Don't use the word 'gifted'! You aren't gifting her anything, you are transferring another 49% of the debt to her. If she owns other property and the 49% is above 40k then she will have to pay at least 3% surcharge on the full amount.


      Latest Activity


      • Complex (for me!) CGT question on 2 property ownership...
        Hi, this is my first post and I'm looking for some initial guidance on what I think is a somewhat complicated problem i'm heading towards...
        Apologies, its a long post!

        The facts:

        In 1983 my parents and I purchased our family council home under the Thatcher 'Right to...
        19-02-2018, 13:42 PM
      • Reply to Complex (for me!) CGT question on 2 property ownership...
        Yes, I think you are right jpkeates. What started out as a fairly simple purchase and investment all those years ago has a life of its own now and has become complicated. I didn't for instance know if I might be able to claim PRR for the 3 years I was there when we first purchased it but just having...
        20-02-2018, 14:44 PM
      • Reply to Complex (for me!) CGT question on 2 property ownership...
        You're probably going to need a tax specialist.
        When you are tenants in common with a percentage ownership, who lived where and when becomes critical and fiddly.

        For example, your third is subject to PPR for periods you were living there, but not when you weren't - family home or...
        20-02-2018, 12:55 PM
      • Reply to Complex (for me!) CGT question on 2 property ownership...
        Hi JPKeates, we were tenants in common and what happened was my father left his share to my mother so she had 67% and I had 33%, which changes the figures Gordon 999 came up with.

        Re your response Gordon999 - thank you so much, you made me realize the obvious - that I hadn't actually owned...
        20-02-2018, 12:46 PM
      • Stamp Duty query
        HP mum
        I originally posted in the finance section - but I now think this is more of a tax question. Some questions arose during a discussion yesterday and I just wondered if anyone has any thoughts/ answers on the below?

        1stly) If someone (or company) buys a debt that has a legal charge over...
        20-02-2018, 11:36 AM
      • Reply to Stamp Duty query
        Transactions are "connected" based on the facts of the transactions.

        You don't buy a property and its debt separately.

        In the example you give, the property is worth £3.5m, anyone buying it at £1.5m would be taxed as though the transaction was £3.5m - unless they...
        20-02-2018, 12:21 PM
      • Reply to Stamp Duty query
        HP mum
        thanks for the reply.

        Still a bit confused. If the debt is not a mortgage; rather a loan charged against a property does that make a difference?

        In such a poor market it is difficult to ascertain what is the "worth".

        If a transaction went through at...
        20-02-2018, 12:03 PM
      • Reply to Stamp Duty query
        Buying a debt wouldn't incur stamp duty (unless the debt was some kind of tradable share). It's an interest in land, but it's unlikely to attract Land Tax as a secondary charge - but if the interest were sufficient to make it a controlling interest it might. If the debt was 99% of the property value,...
        20-02-2018, 11:47 AM
      • Has anyone read anything about the Labour Party's commitment to Land Tax?
        Worried of Bermondsey
        If so, can you share it because, from the little I've read, I'm worried.
        I believe that both Labour and Liberals are committed to replacing Council Tax with Land Tax.
        And I think this has very frightening implications for buy-to-let landlords.
        I've looked at how Land Tax works on...
        11-02-2018, 16:08 PM
      • Reply to Has anyone read anything about the Labour Party's commitment to Land Tax?
        ...they need to bring back Poll Tax, correct and proper tax, you use it, you pay for it (assuming adult etc).

        LVT is never going to get off the runway ..

        If Labour get into power we have far bigger issues than LVT .. after all they cannot even convince us they can actually...
        20-02-2018, 11:11 AM