Section 21 idiot judges

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    I haven't read those cases, but I will say that while there are judges who are prejudiced and those that are attempting to "legislate" or set policy, they are often misunderstood.

    The law protects the tenant's position, and it is for the landlord to make a cogent properly explained and technically sound case (requiring notices to be correct) so that the Judge can be persuaded to grant what you request. They are fundamentally restricted to what is put before them.

    If however they are say concerned about the impact on social housing and a tenants prospect's, it is poor drafting that offers that opportunity to such a Judge.
    Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

    Comment


      #17
      Time for specialist Housing Courts?

      ML
      Refer Mad Regulators to Arkell vs Pressdram.

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by midlandslandlord View Post
        Time for specialist Housing Courts?

        ML
        Possibly.

        The real culprit here is section 21.

        Comment

        Latest Activity

        Collapse

        Working...
        X