Leak from flat above

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Leak from flat above

    Hi, I rent my flat in a tenament in Edinburgh. An agency that lets the flat above (a top floor flat) is proving slow in terms of checking out a leak through a light fitting in my flat. Does anyone have experience of this? I'm assuming if the leak comes from above, which I don't see where else it could come from, their insurance will sort it. Their response so far has been "Let's see if it happens again".

    Right now, they seem reluctant to say whether or not they've checked their pipes and under the floorboards, despite their tenant telling my tenant he has had pipe issues. I can get my plumber to check behind the light fitting but it really needs to be checked from above.

    They did get a plumber report but he looked in their attic and got on the roof but doesn't seem to have checked under the floor. He did report a collection of pipes ion the roof wth no cover. See attached pics. Does anyone know what these are? Water can obviously get into these pipes when it rains if left uncovered. He replaced the cover. I assume this should be the council that addresses any roof issue and the letting agency that got the report should probably report this box with no cover to the Council.

    Thanks for any advice or experiences with similar.

    #2
    A water leak around electricity is a fire hazard and a threat to life. If you know their insurer get onto them, if you know their landlord, or can get the information from their tenant get onto them and tell them the agent is negligent.

    Pipes like that could be anything, e,.g. from gas boilers or extraction fans,old chimneys even. You say no cover then that he put the cover back.

    Comment


      #3
      A water leak near electricity is not a fire hazard; it is an electric shock hazard.

      There is a special forum for Scottish questions.

      Their insurance is unlikely to cover the leak itself. If this only happened once, it is unlikely that you have a claim against the flat above. If there is damage to your flat, you should use your insurers, or self insure. Your insurers will claim against the other flat if they believe there is a valid case of negligence.

      Failing to do the investigation you want may make a claim possible it there is a recurrence, but is not something you can insist on.

      Comment


        #4
        The thiness of those pipes says vent ducts to me.

        Either kitchen or bathroom extractor fans?
        Maybe even just 'passive' ventilation (of a space without a fan?)
        Maybe even tumble dryer vents?

        Whatever they should be covered, but they should not in any way be responsible for letting (rain?)water into your light fitting.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by leaseholder64 View Post
          A water leak near electricity is not a fire hazard; it is an electric shock hazard.

          .
          I am not a qualified electrician - but it is my belief that it is both. If you are lucky there is a circuit breaker that will blow quickly, if the wiring is old or someone has replaced a fuse with one that is too high or you have any other dodgy wiring you'll get a lot of heat. Either way I would regard this as a serious problem and not safe to wait and see if it happens again.

          Therefore I would get on to the insurers of the flat above pointing out that while liability for a leak might be capable of dispute liability for death after you have been informed of a problem is not. The insurers of the flat above may wish to bring pressure to bear to have it sorted.

          Comment

          Latest Activity

          Collapse

          • Reply to Essential Maintenance
            by missile
            Hi,
            The property is in Scotland. There is no lease. In accordance with Deed of Conditions each property owner has an equal responsibility to maintain communal parts of the building.
            My problem is the Managing Agent is not accepting that it is his responsibility, to carry out essential maintenance...
            12-01-2021, 15:59 PM
          • Essential Maintenance
            by missile
            Hi,

            I own a property in a block of flats. There was a leak in the roof. The Managing Agent insisted that he must obtain approval from 50+% before work could commence.
            My concern is that if 50% is not achieved work would not be carried out.
            There are 13 properties. At the time...
            12-01-2021, 14:33 PM
          • Reply to Essential Maintenance
            by AndrewDod
            Who is the freeholder?

            They obey the lease. If the lease says the roof must be sorted it must be sorted. Unless the lease says there is a 50% veto threshold (which is most unlikely) there is no legal justification for such a veto.
            12-01-2021, 15:36 PM
          • Reply to Essential Maintenance
            by missile
            Hi,
            Thanks for your comments. Please be advised:
            The property is in Scotland where there is no requirement for a lease.
            1. Find out how much can be spent without the express consent of the lease-holders (flat owners)
            2. Find out if there are ways around it (like a vote at an EGM).
            3. Look at
            ...
            12-01-2021, 14:13 PM
          • Essential Maintenance
            by missile
            Hi,

            I own a property in a development of 109 freehold properties in 6 flats. Each block has a lift. We do have a Management Agent.

            One flat required a replacement door operator. It took quite a while for the agent to contact and get approval from 50+% of the owners per deed...
            30-01-2020, 06:42 AM
          • first ever award of a Wrongful Termination Order.....
            by theartfullodger
            https://www.scottishhousingnews.com/arti...rs-tenants

            ### The tribunal found that the landlord had misled the tribunal in the eviction proceedings and that the applicant, Jesus, was entitled to a wrongful termination by eviction order. It awarded a penalty of £1,350, equivalent to three...
            11-01-2021, 16:00 PM
          • Windows
            by annathomo
            Hi,
            I wonder if you can help. I rent a private property in Edinburgh and I moved in last August. When I viewed the property the double glazing units in the bedrooms had blown and I was assured they would be fixed prior to move in. I since moved in and didn’t view the property again and the units...
            27-11-2020, 11:24 AM
          • Reply to Windows
            by annathomo
            That’s terrible to hear. I am sorry and I hope you hear soon! 7 months is ridiculous....
            11-12-2020, 12:34 PM
          • Reply to Windows
            by AndrewDod
            Maybe the Scots are getting way to much money. The London FTT has not responded to our urgent critical case correspondence for more than 7 months. In the meantime someone could die given that there are highly lethal building risks involved (like unprotected drops of three stories along communal/public...
            11-12-2020, 12:24 PM
          • Reply to Windows
            by annathomo
            Hi just to update if interested. The FTT has accepted the application and there is a case meeting for January planned. I’m hoping this is resolved prior to that....
            11-12-2020, 12:16 PM
          Working...
          X