Dead-bolting a communal front door in a tenanted property? Legal?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Dead-bolting a communal front door in a tenanted property? Legal?

    Hi, is it illegal to dead-bolt a communal front door from inside in a tenanted building?

    I rent a 1 bed first floor flat in central London on an Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreement (private rental sector). It's in desperately bad condition (really seriously bad) and a tinder box of dry wood and threadbare carpets. The property use to be the sole home of the elderly gentleman (in his mid-80's) who now lives on the ground floor. He recently he sold the entire property to his son who lives overseas. Inside the property has been converted into 3 self contained flats (one home on each floor). I live in the first floor self contained flat.

    Unfortunately the old chap seems to think of the entire property as still being all his own. He ignores that there is a tenant now living in the building too,... a tenant who pays rent and has legal rights. I suspect he thinks of me as some kind of annoying lodger in his house. Trouble is he keeps locking and then bolting the communal front door from the inside. He does this (24/7) thus preventing me from having unhindered access and entry (as my estate agent referred to it). It means I have to trudge up and down flights of stairs every time I need to let my visitors in. The dangers the dead-bolted communal front door poses are very real and significant. In the event of a fire or emergency nobody would not get into the building without a chainsaw or bulldozer.

    I live on the first floor and there isn't any other means of escape. And besides obvious health and safety fears I naturally expect to let my visitors into the building using only my first floor intercom. Aren't I legally entitled to do that? When the old guy bolts the front door at I'm unable to open the main door from upstairs. I have a serious heart condition so I can't schlep up and down stairs to open and close the communal front door 24/7.

    What are my rights? Can somebody please advise me?
    A friend said that in a tenanted property the main front door must only have a single action slip lock and nothing more - and definitely no bolts or Fort Knox style nonsense. Is that true? Am I entitled to ask the elderly gentleman to stop bolting the front door?

    Thank you.
    Last edited by SW7-guy-48; 12-06-2019, 16:57 PM. Reason: Shortened it.

    #2
    The fire brigade will break it down if they need to get in. No-one else should be trying to enter a burning building. That doesn't mean it is a responsible thing to do.

    The real question is can you open it from the inside in a single action. If you need to operate a second knob it is unlikely to be acceptable as a means of escape and the responsible person, presumably the son, will be committing a criminal offence under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005, by not providing adequate means of escape.

    I also wonder if there has been a fire risk assessment, which might involve another offence under the above law.

    I'm also wondering whether the builders wore stetsons and there has been no building control authorisation.

    This falls in an awkward crossover area between the fire brigade and the council. You should try to get LFB to intervene under the above legislation and the council to intervene under the Housing Health and Safety Rating System.

    Unfortunately there is a significant chance of a revenge eviction (from which point of view it might be better to address this through the council, as, if they act, that blocks revenge evictions.

    Comment


      #3
      You tell the elderly gentleman that he has no right to lock you out, ( as that is what he is doing ) and that unless the bolts are removed in 7 days, you will have them removed and he will be billed for the removal.
      If you have a letting agent tell your letting agent that you are being locked out (you can come home at 2am if you wish ), If it happens again, call the police and say you are being prevented from gaining access to your home for no valid reason.

      Me, I would go out one evening and come back at 2am, and I assume you wont be able to get in. If so - call the police. Don't forget to wait those 7 days.

      Comment

      Latest Activity

      Collapse

      • Faulty staircase help
        Mameuk
        I have fallen through my top step in private rented home where me my partner and our 5 month old have lived for 8months. I need advice on a few things if possible?

        First is this we put together 6 months of rent in advance which the agents thought at the beggining of tenancy was up front...
        16-07-2019, 06:54 AM
      • Reply to Faulty staircase help
        leaseholder64
        Having a wear and tear diagnosis is good for you and doesn't invalidate the landlord's safety responsibilities.

        Being ruled wear and tear means you can't be made to pay for the repairs.
        16-07-2019, 10:10 AM
      • Reply to Faulty staircase help
        Mameuk
        16-07-2019, 06:56 AM
      • Asbestos
        bananas
        Hi, just wondered if anyone knows anything about the legal liabilities for asbestos. We own one flat in a converted block. When we refurbished our flat, we found asbestos, and had it removed professionally, and because it was notifiable, that meant the full bells and whistles treatment (and bill)...
        02-07-2019, 20:47 PM
      • Reply to Asbestos
        leaseholder64
        If it is very high risk, it is probably asbestos millboard, rather than asbestos insulation board. The latter can sometimes be removed by non-licensed contractors, although is still subject to legislation.
        02-07-2019, 22:47 PM
      • Reply to Asbestos
        bananas
        Thank you - that is an interesting point about the management survey. I don't know whether it's called insulation board, probably is. I just know that it is the most dangerous stuff. Originally we all thought is was hardboard, and it was only when a sheet of it was unscrewed to do a job on a stopcock,...
        02-07-2019, 22:22 PM
      • Reply to Asbestos
        leaseholder64
        The responsible person, presumably the management company, is supposed to have carried out an asbestos management survey.

        The proposed removal method would be illegal. It must be done by a licensed contractor and any vacuum cleaner would need to have a special, high performance, filter....
        02-07-2019, 22:02 PM
      • Reply to Asbestos
        bananas
        The reason we can't leave it is because we need access to the pipes and wires - work is needed on the fire alarm panel/wires, plus plumbing can't be done - there's no point waiting for a leak and then not being able to instruct a plumber. Plus the area needs re-decorating (the asbestos is damaged and...
        02-07-2019, 21:49 PM
      • Reply to Asbestos
        JK0
        I think there is less of a health risk by leaving well alone than by disturbing it.
        02-07-2019, 21:20 PM
      • Circuit boards
        Samsmum
        I am a director of a resident management company. One of our directors, an ex electrical engineer , ( not registered with a competent persons scheme ) has fitted circuit boards without having them certified. He has told me we can not force residents to have them certified. My question is : how responsible...
        30-06-2019, 09:02 AM
      Working...
      X