Handing keys in & getting deposit back

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Handing keys in & getting deposit back

    Hi all - My parents tenancy is due to end Midnight 5th Feb after approx 14 years in the property. They have been told to hand the keys into the property company tomorrow and the inventory will be carried out at a later date (we have now been advised they can attend this)! This doesn't give me any confidence that the deposit will be returned in full.
    The added difficulty is that the original propoprty agent did conduct and inventory, and when they sold their business to the current propertyagency they didn't do one either. So how can the agency say whether the propoerty is being left in good condition against when they moved in? I advised the company they I am happy to hand the keys in when they agree to pay the deposit, which they won't do until they check the property. If we hand the keys in late they have stated that they will charges extra days rent and the possibily of being taken to court if this is not paid. Please help. Advice gratefully received as this happens tomorrow....
    Thanks

  • #2
    You need to return the keys as they ask, and fight over the deposit later. If there is no original inventory the LL has little chance of getting a court to uphold any deductions.

    Peter

    Comment


    • #3
      Handing keys in & getting deposit back

      Thanks so much. I was considering holding the keys until the checks as we are concerned they could say anything was not good enough. Given the period of time they've been in the property, they've managed to keep the condition as it was. The added difficulty is that the owners are taking back the keys from the agent as they are not renting it out through them again, so thought they could muddy the waters.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by slj20 View Post
        Thanks so much. I was considering holding the keys until the checks as we are concerned they could say anything was not good enough.
        They might still say that, but if they do you should ask for proof of the damage they're deducting from the deposit for. They can't just say "it's not good enough, we're keeping the deposit" --- they need to provide proof of what exactly the deposit is being used to pay for and also proof that your parents are responsible for that damage.

        More than likely that they will try it on, but if there's no original inventory they have a very weak case.

        Peter

        Comment


        • #5
          Furthermore, unless the landlord has carried out significant improvements during the tenancy and can prove it, then even if a carpet that was brand new 14 years ago is worn out, your parents will not be liable, as any court will not allow "betterment", which is where a landlord improves the property at the cost of the tenants. The principle behind this is that the tenant has paid to use the property and its fixtures and fittings (and anything else that was included in the original agreement) and the landlord is able to claim for "wear and tear" against his tax, so it is considered by all that the rent includes payment for "fair wear and tear".

          Comment

          Latest Activity

          Collapse

          • Referencing question
            kangoo1
            A couple wants to rent from me, she is on maternity leave and will not be returning to her previous employment, he is permanently employed and moving due to a job transfer. I have referenced him for the full rent and his guarantor has been successfully referenced.
            I am going to prepare the ast...
            22-07-2017, 17:19 PM
          • Claiming for protected deposit
            mandm
            This is an interesting one, got me into a spin.
            Tenants signed AST but decided to leave after 6 months and 3 days (problem with moving) using the break clause in the AST. I protected the deposit using DPS (Insured) and returned the deposit minus deductions when the moved out.
            I served the...
            21-07-2017, 08:00 AM
          • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
            JK0
            I'll leave it at that. I'm not going to get into one of JPK's interminable arguments.
            22-07-2017, 16:28 PM
          • Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
            MrShed
            I've just posted something on GDPR and then wondered whether it had been discussed on here before - a quick search implies its never been mentioned.

            I thought I would raise a topic to discuss it and the implications on landlords.In effect this is a replacement of the Data Protection Act...
            20-07-2017, 15:01 PM
          • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
            jpkeates
            That's simply one of the Schedule 2 exemptions which, if met, allows a process using personal data at all - all the other principles still apply in parallel (where it can be stored, be not excessive, kept up to date etc).

            So, while it might be OK because it relates to a contract, there...
            22-07-2017, 15:22 PM
          • Excessive estate agent fees
            Cml241
            I have a property which I started renting out via an agency. When the contract started, they found new tenants, did the relevant checks etc and charged an upfront fee which equates to approx one month's rent. As one year has almost passed, the agent has approached me asking if I want them to 'renegotiate'...
            21-07-2017, 16:26 PM
          • Reply to Excessive estate agent fees
            mariner
            A new 12 month fixed term does provide LL & T with extra security but can lead to complications for either if their resp circumstances/legislation change during the new AST.
            Personally, I would prefer if a orig AST was for a fixed 6 month term, followed by an SPT that required both LL &...
            22-07-2017, 14:09 PM
          • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
            jjlandlord
            In this case there should be no problem because:...
            22-07-2017, 12:30 PM
          • Reply to Excessive estate agent fees
            jpkeates
            I'm not sure they're "lying", they're just making some assumptions.

            The agent can't decide if something is "too" risky or not - there are upsides and downsides to having a new fixed term agreement, and they're right to point out, for example, that the income would be...
            22-07-2017, 12:28 PM
          • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
            jpkeates
            Unless the tenant has given consent for the data to be used in this way, probably.

            There's a grey area with this kind of data, because it's obviously been obtained for a purpose (which is to facilitate the renting of a property) and that's what it's being used for.
            There's usually...
            22-07-2017, 12:23 PM
          Working...
          X