Is my deposit protected or not??

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is my deposit protected or not??

    I have a tenancy that started in late April 2007 and so my deposit should be protected. Neither the estate agency or landlord has since written to me stating in which scheme my deposit has been secured.

    So my questions are:
    1. assuming when I ask the agency that they say my deposit is secured, how do I know they are telling me the truth?
    2. what can I ask for in terms of evidence to be sure that my deposit is secured if the agency says it is?
    3. Is it possible that the deposit is not secured but that the agency can now put my deposit into a scheme in order to protect themselves/the landlord.

    Thanks for reading ...

  • #2
    Write to them explaining your concerns and asking for evidence that your deposit has indeed been protected - they are obliged to tell you which scheme has been used. If they aren't able to provide official paperwork, you simply contact the scheme yourself and ask for confirmation.

    There are severe financial penalties in your favour if they haven't complied, so don't worry overly if they haven't done so. Read details in the recent thread here by a tenant who'd taking his former landlord to court over it.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you for teh reply. I know that the DPS scheme automatically tells tenants that the deposit is protected. I can therefore assume that the deposit is not with the DPS (because they have not informed me) so it must be in an insurance scheme.

      If the agency says it is in an insurance scheme, should that insurance scheme have the details of my tenancy? Or can the agency fudge it and just say 'it's protected, don't worry.'

      Thanks ...

      Comment


      • #4
        http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/TenancyDeposit/DG_066373

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by hourkid View Post
          If the agency says it is in an insurance scheme, should that insurance scheme have the details of my tenancy? Or can the agency fudge it and just say 'it's protected, don't worry.'
          Yes and no respectively.

          For all the flaws and failings of the system, as it's intended to protect tenants against dodgy landlords, it does at least take cover the tenant against the possibility that a dodgy landlord might not actually tell the truth about whether the deposit is in a proper scheme.

          Comment


          • #6
            if its with the TDS (the insurance scheme most LA use) then you should receive a certificate confirming all dates, landlord and tenant details etc. we do ours on-line and a certificate is printed off, of which we send one to L, one to T and keep another on file.

            So I would ask for the certificate as proof.

            Comment


            • #7
              Another way to do it is to phone each of the three schemes and ask them if your deposit is registered with them. If not, get it in writing from each one and submit your claim to local county court --- you'll be awarded 3x deposit as penalty, in theory.

              Peter

              Comment


              • #8
                OK. Get this. I called all three schemes this morning and none of them had the deposit covered.

                So I call the agency and ask for the certificate. They delay me for an hour and an half so I call back and ask for the certificate immediately. It then gets delivered to me by email.

                So I call back TDS (who the deposit is now apparently covered by) and they now have the deposit protected. "Funny" I say, "it was not covered 2 hours ago." TDS responds: "That is because it was only covered today."

                So basically, the deposit was not protected, the estate agency lied and is now covering its behind.

                Any suggestions? Presumably the s21 they served me is no longer enforceable? And what about the 3x deposit fine?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by hourkid View Post
                  OK. Get this. I called all three schemes this morning and none of them had the deposit covered.

                  So I call the agency and ask for the certificate. They delay me for an hour and an half so I call back and ask for the certificate immediately. It then gets delivered to me by email.

                  So I call back TDS (who the deposit is now apparently covered by) and they now have the deposit protected. "Funny" I say, "it was not covered 2 hours ago." TDS responds: "That is because it was only covered today."

                  So basically, the deposit was not protected, the estate agency lied and is now covering its behind.

                  Any suggestions? Presumably the s21 they served me is no longer enforceable? And what about the 3x deposit fine?
                  See s.215(1) of Housing Act 2004:
                  "no s.21 Notice may be given...at a time when...the deposit is not being held in accordance with an approved scheme..."
                  So subsequent DPS compliance does not retrospectively validate the invalid s.21 Notice in your case; it remains invalid.
                  JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                  1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                  2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                  3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                  4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by hourkid View Post
                    And what about the 3x deposit fine?
                    You should still be able to claim it, on the basis that the requirements of the scheme were not complied with within 14 days of the deposit being received. But you might be better off negotiating with the agent --- tell them you know what they've done and unless they do X, Y and Z you'll be claiming against them.

                    On the certificate you have, does it not give a date on which the deposit was protected?

                    Peter

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      The certificate says that it covers the period 28 April 2007 to 27 April 2008. The actual protection was put on the system this morning.

                      The agent is now saying they forgot and that they apologise.

                      If this progressed, does the agent pay 3x or is it the landlord? I actually like the landlord but the agency has just been problematic from the word go. I really don't like their attitude which is: "your tenancy is up in a few months. you have to tell us if you want to renwe the flat at 5% more than the current rate." Very aggressive and unnecessarily so ...

                      Any advice, moral or practical appreciated!!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by hourkid View Post
                        If this progressed, does the agent pay 3x or is it the landlord?
                        If the agent should have protected it, I think it's down to the agent.

                        Morally we're in a similar situation --- the agent has not protected our deposit. I've decided that we'll wait to see whether they refund it in full, and if so we'll forget about it. I'm not convinced of the moral case for getting them in trouble before it's really caused me any problems.

                        On the other hand it could be argued why should they get away with it?

                        It's a tricky one.

                        Peter

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          L is obliged to protect deposit. Agent is not. See s.213.
                          JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                          1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                          2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                          3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                          4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by jeffrey View Post
                            See s.215(1) of Housing Act 2004:
                            "no s.21 Notice may be given...at a time when...the deposit is not being held in accordance with an approved scheme..."
                            So subsequent DPS compliance does not retrospectively validate the invalid s.21 Notice in your case; it remains invalid.
                            So the current s21 is invalid. Will the agency just serve a new one on me that is valid?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by hourkid View Post
                              So the current s21 is invalid. Will the agency just serve a new one on me that is valid?
                              I don't know the future- but service of a replacement Notice would be the only way that L could gain s.21 rights against you.
                              JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                              1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                              2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                              3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                              4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              Working...
                              X