Have the letting agents fulfilled their role?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Have the letting agents fulfilled their role?

    Hi Folks,

    Just need some advice on whether you think my letting agent has fulfilled their roll in finding me a 'suitable' tenant or whether you think I should be knocking at their door asking for another tenant free of charge or my money back?

    Basically I asked a letting agent to find me a suitable tenant for my property. They found a girl who'd need income from the local councils revenues and benefits. They carried out a 'Pre Tenancy Determination' and informed me by email that the council would be paying the lions share of the rent (£498.38 of the £575.00 due each month)

    Great! They gave me and my tenant a date to move in and she did so shortly after the PTD.

    I then contact the council to see when I will recieve the first payment, as it is to be paid direct to me. The Council inform me that they are still considering the application and don't know when they'll have a result.

    Two and a half months later I'm still waiting to hear from the council... The tenant pays her top up of £76.62 and after sending the guarantor letters asking for the rent to brought up to date I finally get my first months rent a month late. The guarantor also paid the next months rent in full so they are up to date.

    The council have now informed me that the tenants application has been concluded and she'll recieve £116.00 per month towards her rent. A far cry from the £498.38 the letting agent informed me about before moving the tenant into my property.

    The tenant has now given me a months notice and will be packing her bags mid February due to the fact that she simply cannot afford this on her wage.

    Now due to the fact that I've paid the letting agents £575.00 (1 months rent) plus VAT to find a 'suitable' tenant am I within my rights to go back to the letting agent and request they find a suitable replacement tenant at no extra cost or ask for my money back based on the fact that the tenant was not suitable and could not afford the rent?

    My £675.63 got me a tenant who caused me a load of mither for 3 months and then bailed out!

    I'd appreciate your thoughts how and if I should approach the letting agents?

    Thanks

    Mully

  • #2
    A PTD is a guide NOT an accurate assessment. The form usually says that the council will pay a MAXIMUM % of the rent, ie her claim will have been assessed on say 90% of the rent, ie the council think you are charging too much! If the LA did not inform you of this then I would say they have cocked up and you are entitled to some of the money back. But you will have to fight for it!

    Good luck xx
    GOVERNMENT HEALTH WARNING: I am a woman and am therefore prone to episodes of PMT... if you don't like what I have to say you can jolly well put it in your pipe and SMOKE IT!!

    Oh and on a serious note... I am NOT a Legal person and therefore anything I post could be complete and utter drivel... but its what I have learned in the University called Life!

    Comment


    • #3
      Do bear in mind that if the tenant welches on the deal, she is probably still liable for the rent, even if she can't afford it, unless you give her permission to end the tenancy early without further liability. Note therefore that the agent may say you should just pursue her in the courts for your money and as you would get judgment, the agency is not liable as you can't get the same money twice.

      All that said, I'd still go for it, so good luck!

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Mully View Post
        ... and informed me by email that the council would be paying the lions share of the rent (£498.38 of the £575.00 due each month)
        I would hardly call a PTD of around 85% being the lions share.

        Where benefits are concerned, anything more than £5 - or £10 at the most - will be a struggle, and is asking for trouble.

        Originally posted by Mully View Post
        Now due to the fact that I've paid the letting agents £575.00 (1 months rent) plus VAT to find a 'suitable' tenant am I within my rights to go back to the letting agent and request they find a suitable replacement tenant at no extra cost or ask for my money back based on the fact that the tenant was not suitable and could not afford the rent?
        It all comes down to the agreement signed between you and your agent.

        For example, if it says "undertaking comprehensive referencing by an independent company including financial, employment and address status" this is specific and thus easier to complain about. On the other hand, if it says "undertaking status enquiries which may include the obtaining of financial, employment and address status" then this is more woolly and nebulous.

        You will need to study your agreement and look at that to see if they have fulfilled their duties.
        On some things I am very knowledgeable, on other things I am stupid. Trouble is, sometimes I discover that the former is the latter or vice versa, and I don't know this until later - maybe even much later. Because of the number of posts I have done, I am now a Senior Member. However, read anything I write with the above in mind.

        Comment


        • #5
          I think you'll probably find that the agent has very carefully covered their backs in their t+c's.

          And in any case, you asked them to find you a tenant, and they did; you chose to accept that tenant based on what LA told you about council's contributions (which was a mistake); so I'm not sure if you have much of a case.

          The moral of the story is, don't trust LA's until they've proved themselves worthy of trust.

          Peter

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Wickerman
            For crying out loud why do people do this?

            One months rent = £575.

            Agents commission (if fully managed) of 12.5% = £84.45 (inc vat).
            That is only £338 a year more than the one-off tenant finding service and they get to not worry (As much) about managing your property. I think one months rent is WAY too much to charge for tenant finding. We normally do it for 3/4 of a months rent - enough to make it worthwhile for both parties.

            The only plus side to a tenant find only service is you are ahead if the tenant stays on more than 1 year. Many tenants do not.
            Thanks for your responce but 'for crying out loud' some people (like me) are very new at this and are just learning... sometimes from our mistakes. We all start off with no experience and gain it as we go along, which is why I always look for help on here from experienced people like yourself.

            Thanks again for the advice, I certainly understand your point and it takes people like yourself to point these things out.

            May be next time you could start your response with.... 'Have you every thought of doing it this way? I'll explain'...

            It won't make me feel like such a fool when I seeking advice and being open and honest about my errors!

            Comment


            • #7
              It's your money!! Maybe you should have read up properly before you try letting out your house?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Skengland View Post
                It's your money!! Maybe you should have read up properly before you try letting out your house?
                What's wrong with some people on here? I ask for some honest advice and get made to feel like a fool. I currently run another business and didn't have the time to read and memorize the whole law on residential letting. I have done quite a bit of reading on the matter but not everything can be gained from books. Forgive me for not being a genius.

                The reason I'm on here is to learn from other people experiences and to try and save myself some dosh.

                Comment


                • #9
                  OI Children Play nice and leave the poor newbie alone!

                  Mully I think you have been led up the garden path a little and I hope you were not taking offence to my post! I just wanted to post the facts!
                  GOVERNMENT HEALTH WARNING: I am a woman and am therefore prone to episodes of PMT... if you don't like what I have to say you can jolly well put it in your pipe and SMOKE IT!!

                  Oh and on a serious note... I am NOT a Legal person and therefore anything I post could be complete and utter drivel... but its what I have learned in the University called Life!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Mully View Post
                    What's wrong with some people on here? I ask for some honest advice and get made to feel like a fool. I currently run another business and didn't have the time to read and memorize the whole law on residential letting. I have done quite a bit of reading on the matter but not everything can be gained from books. Forgive me for not being a genius.

                    The reason I'm on here is to learn from other people experiences and to try and save myself some dosh.
                    Mully,

                    Don't take it personally --- sometimes its easy to get the wrong impression from posts on here, I'm sure people don't mean any offence.

                    I think people do get frustrated because there are some LLs (and I'm not suggesting this is you) who think letting property is an easy game, so they jump in without knowing the rules, then get stung, and then complain about it. Letting is a complicated business --- someone once posted the number of laws that apply to it but I can't remember the exact number.

                    Hope you get your problem sorted

                    Peter

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I'm sorry.

                      I'm currently trying to get my deposit back from a LL with no clue about the law (he's trying to charge me for fixing the boiler and the complete replacement of perfectly working fridge).

                      Actually the LA we dealt with were pretty cr*p too....

                      Comment

                      Latest Activity

                      Collapse

                      • Claiming for protected deposit
                        mandm
                        This is an interesting one, got me into a spin.
                        Tenants signed AST but decided to leave after 6 months and 3 days (problem with moving) using the break clause in the AST. I protected the deposit using DPS (Insured) and returned the deposit minus deductions when the moved out.
                        I served the...
                        21-07-2017, 08:00 AM
                      • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
                        Interlaken
                        OP - yes do send the confirmation email from the DPS to the solicitor for the tenants. That should stop proceedings but did you give them the PI and How to Rent details + gas certificate. In future make tenants sign a receipt to say they received these items - I do it on move in day and leave them...
                        21-07-2017, 08:41 AM
                      • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
                        MrShed
                        JK - there are *some* upsides of taking a deposit. The main two for me:
                        1) Regardless of what it can feel like on here, the majority of tenants do not know they can play the system in this way.
                        2) There is something to be said for the mindset of a tenant who has something "invested"...
                        21-07-2017, 08:19 AM
                      • Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                        MrShed
                        I've just posted something on GDPR and then wondered whether it had been discussed on here before - a quick search implies its never been mentioned.

                        I thought I would raise a topic to discuss it and the implications on landlords.In effect this is a replacement of the Data Protection Act...
                        20-07-2017, 15:01 PM
                      • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                        jpkeates
                        The ICO should be fining landlords for not registering as data processors - they're not.

                        The maximum amount of personal data held by landlords and agents arises out of tenant referencing, and, if that were to be destroyed after a couple of months, most landlords would arguably be pretty...
                        21-07-2017, 08:16 AM
                      • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
                        JK0
                        I'm afraid this rant won't help you much o/p, but:

                        STILL!? Still landlords are giving tenants a way to wheedle thousands out of them for no good reason?

                        I have come to the conclusion this whole deposit protection nonsense is a government sponsored scam. There is barely any...
                        21-07-2017, 08:12 AM
                      • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
                        jpkeates
                        They are probably claiming that you didn't protect the deposit and give them the Prescribed Information document, both of which you are required to do within 30 days of receipt of the deposit.

                        If you didn't do both things to the appropriate deadline, you didn't protect the deposit correctly....
                        21-07-2017, 08:09 AM
                      • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                        jjlandlord
                        Source: http://news.pwc.ch/31824/gdpr-key-ch...-eu-companies/

                        That being said, I don't think it will have much impact on landlords:



                        I don't think that'll be the case. References are legitimate and widespread.



                        ...
                        21-07-2017, 07:51 AM
                      • Help. Scam/ fraud letting
                        Hayleydenice93
                        Hiya

                        i need some advise on my situation in regards to this flat offered to me and my partner. We viewed a flat which was in an old office block which had been converted into service apartments and then refurbished into flats.

                        The agency we viewed the flats through did not want...
                        20-07-2017, 20:59 PM
                      • Reply to Help. Scam/ fraud letting
                        theartfullodger
                        You do not have to own a place to be the Landlord. Suspect they rent from owner (their Landlord), they then rent (as your Landlord) to you.

                        Doubt there's any chance of getting proper tenancy from them. You could sign licence, move in, then try and get rights as an AST Tenant (eg sue for...
                        21-07-2017, 07:46 AM
                      Working...
                      X