Alternatives to deposit protection

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Alternatives to deposit protection

    Several recent threads highlight the problems which L faces in trying to obtain, at end of tenancy, deposit funds held by DPS etc. where T is in arrears or has otherwise breached Tenancy Obligations.

    Every case is individual, true, and L may be happy about the deposit schemes available- but here are some lawful options whch entirely avoid the deposit protection rules:

    A. Let on AST, take no deposit at all, but insure against T default (e.g. MARAS or similar insurer).

    B. Let on Standard Assured Tenancy (not AST), still within the Housing Act 1988, as deposit rules apply only to AST. Only disadvantage of SAT: L cannot use s.21 procedure (but, if L was a previous owner-occupier of the property, L can regain identical rights by serving a pre-tenancy ground 1 Notice; or L letting to students may be comfortable with absence of s.21 because non-local student is unlikely to try and stay after University term ends).

    C. Let at >£25 000 per year (or to a company). Such a tenancy is entirely outside the Housing Act 1988.
    JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
    1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
    2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
    3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
    4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

    #2
    'Scuse my ignorance, but would option A also cover LL in case of T causing damage to property, or would it just cover unpaid rent?

    Peter

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by pcwilkins View Post
      'Scuse my ignorance, but would option A also cover LL in case of T causing damage to property, or would it just cover unpaid rent?

      Peter
      Depends on terms of insurance, I imagine.
      JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
      1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
      2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
      3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
      4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

      Comment


        #4
        [QUOTE=jeffrey;59736]Several recent threads highlight the problems which L faces in trying to obtain, at end of tenancy, deposit funds held by DPS etc. QUOTE]

        Hi Jeffrey you are obviously the master of the non AST contract! So if I can I’ll tell you my situation and then if you don’t mind I have some questions. I rent out a large 7 bed house and the rental income is above 25K. It isn’t a student let - all my tenants are young professionals working in the city. I wrote them a one year AST last Sep but from what you have written I can see it is not valid. So here are my questions:

        1) Since I don’t need an AST I believe I can write any contract I like that obviously takes into account tenants rights. What should this contract look like? Is there a template somewhere? Or can I just base it on the standard AST but just cut out any reference to the phrase “AST” – I know I don’t have to offer my tenants all the rights a standard AST offers but I think it’s a pretty fair contract and I am happy to extend them these rights.I presume at the top of the contract I write “Non-Housing Act Tenancy”?

        2) I presume, unlike an SAT, I don’t have to inform the tenants that this is not an AST.

        3) Since there are 5+ people do I have to write the contract as per one of your previous answers that begins “For person 5+, I'd recommend a Supplemental Agreement between L and each supernumerary person occupying (O)”. Or is this for ASTs only? If it not just for ASTs and applies to me where can I find a template that includes the correct wording?

        4) Also since this is not a SAT, I don’t have to serve them a pre-tenancy Ground 1 Notice right? I just have to give them reasonable notice to quit?

        5) Since it’s not an AST I can’t use Section 21 but can still use Section 8 right? Are there any other avenues open to me since Section 21 is not?

        6) I would like to issue this new contract in Sep when the contract is up for renewal otherwise I may have to spend lost of time explaining why I am "changing things" mid-contract. Is this ok since all rights still hold i.e. since I do not have an AST with my tenants despite what we all signed, it’s assumed in law that we have a Non-Housing Act Tenancy with all the usual rights that confers?

        Phew – that was longer than I planned! Thanks in advance.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Ash_1 View Post
          I rent out a large 7 bed house and the rental income is above 25K. It isn’t a student let - all my tenants are young professionals working in the city. I wrote them a one year AST last Sep but from what you have written I can see it is not valid.
          Not true! It is valid, but it binds only people 1-4 (not 5-7).

          Originally posted by Ash_1 View Post
          1) Since I don’t need an AST I believe I can write any contract I like that obviously takes into account tenants rights. What should this contract look like? Is there a template somewhere? Or can I just base it on the standard AST but just cut out any reference to the phrase “AST” – I know I don’t have to offer my tenants all the rights a standard AST offers but I think it’s a pretty fair contract and I am happy to extend them these rights.I presume at the top of the contract I write “Non-Housing Act Tenancy”?
          Not true. You can let on AST or SAT. In latter case, Agreement needs modifying. It will bind only people 1-4 nonetheless.

          Originally posted by Ash_1 View Post
          Since there are 5+ people do I have to write the contract as per one of your previous answers that begins “For person 5+, I'd recommend a Supplemental Agreement between L and each supernumerary person occupying (O)”.
          Yes, whether AST or not.
          JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
          1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
          2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
          3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
          4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

          Comment


            #6
            Don't 'not take a deposit'.

            I would suggest it is better to take a deposit of 2p.

            At the end of the tenancy, withhold 1p for damages and encourage the tenant to dispute the reduction. Take it to arbitration if necessary.

            This would really screw up the TDS business model.



            OG

            Comment


              #7
              Could you just take zero deposit but take 2 months rent in advance instead?

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by frednick View Post
                Could you just take zero deposit but take 2 months rent in advance instead?
                Of course --- you can take 6 month's rent in advance if you want. But that still means you don't have anything to cover damage or unpaid rent, so you might still want to take out insurance.

                Peter

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by over graced View Post
                  This would really screw up the TDS business model.
                  Why would you want to do that, though?

                  Peter

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by jeffrey View Post
                    Not true! It is valid, but it binds only people 1-4 (not 5-7).

                    Not true. You can let on AST or SAT. In latter case, Agreement needs modifying. It will bind only people 1-4 nonetheless.

                    Yes, whether AST or not.
                    Wow – obviously I only have a partial understanding!

                    I thought that since the rental income was above 25K it was NOT possible for me to use an AST - I see from what you say that I can. Since it avoids TDS I still think I’d like to go down the Non-Housing Act Tenancy route anyway. So I will just modify the AST I have to take out any reference to AST and Section 21? Should I include something about the fact that I still reserve the right to re-possession given say one month’s notice? Even though my understanding is that with a Non-Housing Act Tenancy you don’t even have to give notice.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Ash_1 View Post
                      I thought that since the rental income was above 25K it was NOT possible for me to use an AST - I see from what you say that I can. Since it avoids TDS I still think I’d like to go down the Non-Housing Act Tenancy route anyway. So I will just modify the AST I have to take out any reference to AST and Section 21? Should I include something about the fact that I still reserve the right to re-possession given say one month’s notice? Even though my understanding is that with a Non-Housing Act Tenancy you don’t even have to give notice.
                      1. NO! You have misunderstood.
                      2. You cannot sell/let/transfer title to > 4 people. This is true for EVERY case under no matter what legislation (except re charities etc.)- even a long leasehold or a freehold sale.
                      3. A residential letting @ rent > £25 000 is outside the Housing Act 1988, cannot be either an AST or an SAT, and is not within any of the deposit requirements. Only common-law and contractual rules apply. The limit of 4 people also applies of course.
                      JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                      1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                      2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                      3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                      4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by jeffrey View Post
                        1. NO! You have misunderstood.
                        2. You cannot sell/let/transfer title to > 4 people. This is true for EVERY case under no matter what legislation (except re charities etc.)- even a long leasehold or a freehold sale.
                        3. A residential letting @ rent > £25 000 is outside the Housing Act 1988, cannot be either an AST or an SAT, and is not within any of the deposit requirements. Only common-law and contractual rules apply. The limit of 4 people also applies of course.
                        I’m sorry I know I’m being dim. What’s confused me is in response to my questions you said:

                        “Not true. You can let on AST or SAT.”

                        I took this to mean ASTs could apply to my situation. Obviously that’s not what you meant because you say

                        “A residential letting @ rent > £25 000 is outside the Housing Act 1988, cannot be either an AST or an SAT,”

                        I’m sure you’re probably answering different questions which I am conflating in my head.

                        Anyway that’s by the by. To summarise my position, as I understand it from what you have said, I have to use a Non-Housing Act Tenancy because an AST or SAT is not applicable due to income being >25K. Good. But since I have 5+ tenants I have to write it as per one of your previous answers:

                        “For person 5+, I'd recommend a Supplemental Agreement between L and each supernumerary person occupying (O)”.

                        I plan to write the draft and then I’ll contact you via e-mail to ask how much you’d charge to look over it for me.

                        Thanks a lot.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Now you've got the idea- excellent!
                          JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                          1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                          2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                          3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                          4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Ash_1 View Post
                            I’m sure you’re probably answering different questions which I am conflating in my head.
                            Good word --- conflating. I must use that more often. I actually had to look it up.

                            Peter

                            Comment


                              #15
                              So is it still possible to give each tenant 1-4 a separate six month Non-Housing Act Tenancy (reason for this they are sharing and don't know eachother) contract to sign. For each tenant after this (5,6,7) a six month Non-Housing Act Tenancy contract plus a 'Supplemental Agreement'?

                              How would you suggest the deposit is taken and held?

                              Thanks in advance,
                              My opinions are exactly what you would expect, my own!

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              • Reply to Choosing tenants
                                by AndrewDod
                                No you really really can ask for landlords references/statements etc on more than one simultaneously. Indeed you often must. Be transparent though....
                                07-07-2022, 14:16 PM
                              • Choosing tenants
                                by annam222
                                Hi all,
                                I advertised my flat on OpenRent (for the first time) and received 90 viewing requests in a few days (I have removed the advert now).
                                I set up an automated reply to all enquires with a list of 10 questions, then picked five potential tenants that ticked all the boxes. I called all...
                                07-07-2022, 13:09 PM
                              • Reply to Can I claim rent reduction due to building noise and landlord’s misrepresentation ??
                                by jpkeates
                                You have rights under consumer law if there were things that would have led you (or any reasonable person) to make a different purchasing decision that you were not advised of.
                                It's called a misleading omission.
                                The legislation that covers it is Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations...
                                07-07-2022, 13:52 PM
                              • Can I claim rent reduction due to building noise and landlord’s misrepresentation ??
                                by A.Renter
                                I started renting a ‘studio apartment’ (i.e. a bedsit) in January this year in a three-storey 1930s block – residents are a mix of renters and leaseholders. I am considering asking for rent reduction due to two main issues:
                                1. Upon moving in I noticed that there is no way to turn off the radiator, as
                                ...
                                06-07-2022, 16:41 PM
                              • Reply to Choosing tenants
                                by ash72
                                Based on the information, I would pick the one with the highest salary, as they will be able to afford the property and the costs of running the property. If you haven't already I would ask them why they are leaving the property they are currently renting - this provides good insight.

                                And...
                                07-07-2022, 13:51 PM
                              • Reply to Evicted and left a few bits
                                by jpkeates
                                Not unless there's a right of offset in the tenancy agreement.
                                There's no general right to offset in English law.

                                In reality, if the landlord did sell the belongings and claim the proceeds were to recover the cost of disposal (which the bailee is entitled to do), the tenant would...
                                07-07-2022, 13:45 PM
                              • Evicted and left a few bits
                                by betsy2040
                                I been evicted today and I’ve left a few bits of stuff ,

                                marble table and dining chairs , mattress 2 sofas ect ect boxes of stuff , curtains , few boxes of clothes and shoes , and sideboards and all my garden stuff

                                How long have I got to remove all this?...
                                06-07-2022, 18:56 PM
                              • Reply to Renters reform bill
                                by jpkeates
                                Magna Carta doesn't apply to us common people.

                                Your right to private property is in the Human Rights Act, though.
                                And, ironically, our best protection is likely to be the amount of property that is owned by non-UK citizens, particularly companies.
                                07-07-2022, 13:42 PM
                              • Renters reform bill
                                by flyingfreehold
                                i have just read an interesting summary of all that is proposed in the EG (Estates Gazette). As drafted it effectively brings back a form of rent control as tenants will have the right to go to First Tier Tribunal to challenge any rent increases which must be proposed by section 13 notices.
                                ...
                                04-07-2022, 16:29 PM
                              • Reply to Choosing tenants
                                by AndrewDod
                                Can't see any problem with asking for bank statements and landlord references from all of them right now. Also visit them in their current homes if possible. Don't be unfair and lead them on however - explain clearly that they are one of three possible candidates out of 90. Ask for copies of their current...
                                07-07-2022, 13:42 PM
                              Working...
                              X