There are MANY cowboys in operation out there! Section 21 is the correct route
Landlord's sale jeopardised as old tenant won't leave
Collapse
X
-
GOVERNMENT HEALTH WARNING: I am a woman and am therefore prone to episodes of PMT... if you don't like what I have to say you can jolly well put it in your pipe and SMOKE IT!!
Oh and on a serious note... I am NOT a Legal person and therefore anything I post could be complete and utter drivel... but its what I have learned in the University called Life!
-
Section 20 Notices do not apply to new tenancies post-February 1997.JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).
Comment
-
Originally posted by danglar View PostI d rather not answer those who quickly round up to defend their ..colleagues.
Firstly I am not a solicitor. Secondly I do not think that you have understood what is going on.
You have arranged to sell a *vacant* flat. It is up to you and your team to ensure that it is vacant at completion.
Based upon your assurances that your tenants were vacating, your team has agreed on a completion date of Wednesday, after their intended departure.
Through no fault of your solicitor or agent, your tenants are still there. You therefore cannot complete on a vacant property - which is what you have contracted to do.
YOU will therefore be in breach of contract, not your agent, solicitor or anybody else. You therefore have to manage the process so that it is resolved. I do not see why you are blaming your solicitors.The contents of this note are neither advice nor a definitive answer. If you plan to rely on this, you should pay somebody for proper advice.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Grange View PostFirstly I am not a solicitor. Secondly I do not think that you have understood what is going on.
You have arranged to sell a *vacant* flat. It is up to you and your team to ensure that it is vacant at completion.
Based upon your assurances that your tenants were vacating, your team has agreed on a completion date of Wednesday, after their intended departure.
Through no fault of your solicitor or agent, your tenants are still there. You therefore cannot complete on a vacant property - which is what you have contracted to do.
YOU will therefore be in breach of contract, not your agent, solicitor or anybody else. You therefore have to manage the process so that it is resolved. I do not see why you are blaming your solicitors.
The Agents have had the property in their books since May and have arranged directly with the tenants for viewings to take place.
The solicitor was informed I had tenants but choice not to listen.
The Agents filled the Notice for me !
Now the solicitor - whom the Agents works with and recommended to me - says the Agents gave me the wrong Notice to pass to the tenants.
I am not a professional and YES I should blame myself for putting my trust in those who call themselves...Professionals!
The minute a difficulty comes up they shrink back into their holes and are only interested in the fees . Advice ? Yes, the wrong one.
Help ? No they are too busy with other matters.
Competence ? They are the best in their business, if you ask them !
SO: IS NOTICE SECTION 21 THE RIGHT NOTICE FOR A ASSURED TENANCY CONTRACT STIPULATED IN OCTOBER 2005 OR NOT ??
As I said in another post: my solicitor (as late as yesterday afternoon) thought not, the Agents and others in this forum thinks it is .
Where is the truth ??
Nino
Comment
-
Originally posted by Colincbayley View PostYes a Section 21 notice is the correct notice to use.
However, danglar states that it is only an Assured Tenancy (i.e. a Standard Assured Tenancy?- if so, s.21 does not apply).JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Colincbayley View PostIn the first post it says Assured Shorthold?JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).
Comment
-
My tenants moved out on Saturday. What a relief !
Thanks to all (competent and less so) from this forum for all your replies !
I should be able to complete on Wednesday and after that I will not want to have anything to do again in UK with the business of renting out a property.
Who owns the place after all ??
The owner or the tenant ?? The freeholder or the leaseholder ?
Scums seem to have the law on their side these days and those who should know the law seem to know lesser and lesser.
The hell with it all .
Best regards
danglar
Comment
-
JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Colincbayley View PostJeffrey,
Does your wit have no end?
Otherwise it would be a wi, later replaced by wii.JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).
Comment
-
Originally posted by jeffrey View PostGreat news. Well done.
Even landlords know lessor and lessor.
And now this, Jeffrey !!
My solicitor called me this morning to forewarn me transfer of the funds will not likely take place today, the sale completion date.
He is closing his office for ..."religious holidays" tomorrow and the day after and so he is moving the date to Monday 15th.
I ll be losing interests and - in theory at least - the purchaser ig being given time to pull out if he wants to , doesn t he/she ??
Nino
Comment
Latest Activity
Collapse
-
by Kareniq133Thank you for the replies. The landlord sacked the letting agent as it turned out they hadn't done what they said they had. The landlord has engaged a solicitor to deal with the eviction and when they asked the agent for the court paperwork they didn't provide anything. So they have started again and...
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
06-03-2021, 21:26 PM -
-
by Kareniq133Hi
I have had a nightmare neighbour issue for a long time and engaged with the letting agent to resolve this. The letting agent served both a section 21 and section 8 due to anti-social behabiour and rent arrears respectively, but the hearing was put on hold due to the pandemic. The hearing...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
16-01-2021, 17:52 PM -
-
by KTZ32I provided a list of damages and costs (minus fair wear and tear) with the check out report to the vacated tenant. They requested their full deposit be returned in full and did not request the deposit return through the tenancy deposit scheme.
I had to commence legal action as the damage...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
06-03-2021, 16:17 PM -
-
by KTCThat doesn't mean it favours the tenant in the sense that it's unfair or bias.
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
06-03-2021, 18:48 PM -
-
Reply to County court bailiffsIn Scotland, did they ban S21 evictions for existing, ongoing tenancies, or only for new tenancies?
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
06-03-2021, 18:06 PM -
-
by PerceHello All
What county court bailiffs do if they come to evict and the tenants say they are not feeling well?...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
24-02-2021, 13:42 PM -
-
by boletushttps://www.lettingagenttoday.co.uk/...-agents-at-DPS
Of the DPS adjudications, the large proportion (41.5%) found wholly in favour of the tenant and just 19.1% wholly in favour of the landlord or letting agent...-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
06-03-2021, 17:30 PM -
-
by KTCIf you are definitely going to court to claim for more than the amount of the deposit, then just stick with that. I don't know whether you would had to have agreed to ADR when you protected the deposit with your particular scheme, but if you are taking legal action, you should definitely be able to...
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
06-03-2021, 17:00 PM -
-
Reply to County court bailiffsby PerceSlackjawedyokel - I will read tea leaves tonight to see what lies ahead......
-
Channel: Residential Letting Questions
06-03-2021, 16:08 PM -
Comment