Some help with translating a letting contract.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Busby
    replied
    Just to post thanks for the help Guys.

    I had a word with the landlord and they have very kindly agreed that I can serve a 2 month notice period. So we now move out on 15th September. Very nice of them indeed.

    Thanks again.

    Leave a comment:


  • J4L
    replied
    I've got to agree here it does sound like it's a 12 month break clause and not a six month one as may be suggested in the first line.

    Leave a comment:


  • TonyH
    replied
    This is totally contradictory.
    How can you serve notice any time after six months, but not before twelve months.
    Total rubbish.
    Would 'Unfair terms' be appropriate in this case.

    Tony

    Leave a comment:


  • cillitbanger
    replied
    So the 6 month break clause is in fact a 12 month break clause?

    Leave a comment:


  • jeffrey
    replied
    Originally posted by Busby View Post
    I can see where it says "This is not to be served until the 16th June 2008"

    So that means that this part at the beginning "Any time after six months of the initial fixed term of this tenancy" doesn't in fact apply? as I have to wait until 16th June 2008 anyway?

    It almost looks like it's contradicting itself.
    (Sigh)
    Let's break down quoted wording. The fixed term was 18 months from 16 June 2007.

    1. Either party can serve Notice but not within first six months of term or of fixed-length extension.
    2. The Notice must be of at least two months.
    3. The Notice period must end when a rent period ends.
    4. The Notice cancels all rights and obligations when it takes effect, except for then-existing breaches.
    5. The Notice cannot be served before 16 June 2008.

    Where is inconsistency? 1 and 5 are both necessary, because fixed-length extension could arise at any point after on or after 16 December 2008.
    Last edited by jeffrey; 12-07-2007, 09:35 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Busby
    replied
    I can see where it says "This is not to be served until the 16th June 2008"

    So that means that this part at the beginning "Any time after six months of the initial fixed term of this tenancy" doesn't in fact apply? as I have to wait until 16th June 2008 anyway?

    It almost looks like it's contradicting itself.

    Leave a comment:


  • jeffrey
    replied
    Originally posted by Busby View Post
    So you think he 6 months won't apply until after June 2008?

    All very confusing
    Read the original quotation's final sentence, please.

    Leave a comment:


  • Busby
    replied
    So you think he 6 months won't apply until after June 2008?

    All very confusing

    Leave a comment:


  • jeffrey
    replied
    But surely the explicit date reference precludes service of Notice before 16 June 2008 in any event?

    Leave a comment:


  • Busby
    replied
    Thanks. It's very much appreciated.

    Leave a comment:


  • cillitbanger
    replied
    I'd have to look into that, as it's an 18month contract which is unusual (why 18?) i think you may have to give 2 months notice on the 16th December and end the tenancy on the 15th February 2008.
    I'll get back to you, maybe not tonight though ok
    It's also unusual for the tenant to give 2 months notice as it's normally only a month, ask your agent if the tenancy wording is accurate?
    Dont say why you want to know, some can get funny when they know you want to leave

    Leave a comment:


  • Busby
    replied
    Thanks. Will the fact they've put the incorrect date be something they can hold me to? I should have noticed I guess but I honestly didn't think I would want to move out after six months.

    The wording seems to imply that after 6 months of the start of my Tenancy so in this case 16th June. so I should be able to leave on or after the 16th December? Or would I not be able to give notice until the 16th December and thus move out on or after the 16th Feb.

    As you can tell I'm quite new to this. Thanks again.

    Leave a comment:


  • cillitbanger
    replied
    Yes you can move out after 6 months with no repercussions, i think they may have made a mistake on the date.
    I'm sure it should read Dec 2007

    Leave a comment:


  • Busby
    started a topic Some help with translating a letting contract.

    Some help with translating a letting contract.

    Me and my wife just recenlty moved into a new flat on 16th June. Unfortunely the block of flats we've moved into have the worst soundproofing I've ever heard. None of our neighbours are particularly noisy it's just you can hear every footstep, the TV's, Hi fi's etc. Due to this our dog seems constantly on edge and I've got to say the noise drives me crazy too. Doesn't bother my wife at all though

    Now my problem is we've signed a 18month lease (idiots I know). I've been looking at our contract and it's got the following:-

    Any time after six months of the initial fixed term of this tenancy (or after a similar period following a fixed term extension to the original tenenacy) either party may invoike this break clause by providing a minimum of two months written notice to the other (such notice to expire on the last day of a rental period of the tenancy). At the end of such notice the tenancy shall end all obligations and responsibilities shall cease; subject neverthless to any claim by either party against the other in respect of any breach of any of the terms and condidtions of the agreement. This is not to be served until the 16 June 2008

    Now does this mean that 6 months after my lease has started I can give two months notice and move out free as a bird or am I missing something?

    Thanks

Latest Activity

Collapse

  • Reply to accelerated possession section 8
    by jpkeates
    That's not the same thing, though.

    A section 21 notice accelerated possession claim is one that can proceed without a hearing (although that doesn't always happen). It is a specific process that you elect to follow (or not).

    A section 8 notice will always have a hearing, because...
    18-01-2022, 17:36 PM
  • accelerated possession section 8
    by imranpal
    Is it possible to exercise accelerated possession using section 8 ?

    My solicitor is advising to go with accelerated possession to evict the tenant and once we have court order we can file another court case to collect the rent arrears .

    i was in impression that accelerated...
    18-01-2022, 12:45 PM
  • Reply to Tenancy inspection - more than one inspector?
    by jpucng62
    As a LL who uses a letting agent, I like to look around my properties occasionally in order to ascertain whether I need to be doing anything - I find my views and the agent's often differ! There is no reason to be particularly alarmed by this - I would see it as an opportunity to raise any issues with...
    18-01-2022, 17:04 PM
  • Reply to Property Guardianship services - any experiences?
    by JamesHopeful
    Thank you both. I have now read up about it.

    As far as I can see, there are a number of risks to both the resident guardian and the guardianship company. The former (ostensibly) has very few rights and may end up living in a substandard or even dangerous property; the latter risks getting...
    18-01-2022, 16:46 PM
  • Reply to Tenancy inspection - more than one inspector?
    by mokka
    Won’t care if buying property as I did ...
    18-01-2022, 16:24 PM
  • Reply to accelerated possession section 8
    by imranpal
    as per this blog it is possible If the tenant falls behind with rent, the landlord can repossess the property and cut their losses. After you miss to pay 2 months of rent, the landlord is eligible to use an accelerated possession procedure. If proven the court will grant the order immediately.
    ...
    18-01-2022, 15:30 PM
  • Reply to accelerated possession section 8
    by jpkeates
    There is no accelerated possession with section 8.

    I think your solicitor is suggesting using section 21 to obtain possession and then making a separate claim for the money the tenant (presumably) owes.

    That would be the advice of many people here, provided that you can serve...
    18-01-2022, 13:13 PM
  • Reply to Tenancy inspection - more than one inspector?
    by ash72
    It may be that the LL is making sure the LA is doing their job with their property, rather than checking up on you. Is there any reason you don't want both of them looking at the same time, I would have thought it was more efficient then each come separately.

    You just need to ensure you...
    18-01-2022, 11:04 AM
  • Reply to Rent increase or being served notice
    by ash72
    Just bear in mind, when you are served notice, and don't leave, the LL/ LA will then move towards the courts, once this happens all the costs will then be on the T.

    Your best solution is to communicate with the LL/LA as well as search for alternative accommodation, you will have up to 2...
    18-01-2022, 10:58 AM
  • Reply to Rent increase or being served notice
    by Goodeys
    Many thanks all for your reply. Yeah there is nothing on the market at all really, nightmare.

    I assume they wish to serve me with a S21 immediately as they gave me 7 days to respond which would tie in with S21 being served two months before my tenancy even ends.

    I’ve been...
    18-01-2022, 10:23 AM
Working...
X