Moving out of house advice

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Moving out of house advice

    hI,

    Im moving out of my 4 person shared flat at the weekend when the AST runs out. Another guy is moving in instead of me. I have 4 questions. My landlord is coming round tomorrow to inspect the property...

    1) In my opinion it is in the same state as when i moved in. I aknoledge that there are a couple of marks on the lounge wall about 2 inches across. Can this be put down to wear and tear and if not what is the maxiumum the LL can take out my deposit.
    2) I intend to tidy the flat, but does it need to be spotless if he is assessing the wear and tear in order to give me back my deposit. I know this sounds like a stupid questin but the others in the flat arent moving out and it seems quire hard constantly tidying and cleaning after them so that the landlord sees a pristine flat.
    3)When i moved in the exisintg tenant i moved in with said the carpets were not going to be cleaned - they were not. I have actually cleaned them myself last week knowing that i am going to move out and i know that there small stains on the carpet when i moved in. Can the LL deduct form my deposit even though they were not done by anyone in the AST that i am in (i.e the tenants before me). P.s I did not sign and havent seen an inventory.
    If he tries to take money from me, is there a standard figure, i assume he cant take £100 for a dark 1 penny size spot on the carpet.

    4) My housemate lost his keys and the LL got in a locksmith to replace the cylinder of the yale lock, however a month after this the lock failed (it was the block bit on the back of the door NOT the cylinder that was replaced that failed) In a nutshell, the locksmith thinks its the part he did not replace, whereas the LL thinks the locksmtih's spinning me a yarn (I know for a fact its NOT the part the Locksmith did not replace, however the LL wont listen). Anyway whose responsibility is it to replace the lock as I have a feeling the LL will try and take this problem out of my deposit. In case your sondering we have a mortice lock that we've been using?

    Many Thanks for you advice
    Last edited by plumberman; 26-07-2005, 10:46 AM.

  • #2
    1) No, and he can take whatever it costs to repaint the wall.

    2) You would have to discuss with the landlord.

    3) Ah, now this makes it entirely different. If you have not seen an inventory or signed it, he cannot deduct a bean from your deposit. BTW, if the mark on the carpet did not come out, he could theoretically, and fairly also, charge for the replacement of the entire carpet. However, if you have not seen an inventory he cannot do this.

    4) First of all, the sentence makes no sense. But you/other tenant are responsible for the cost of the initial lock, but not subsequent costs of the lock being faulty.

    Do not accept any deductions from your deposit, he cannot without an inventory.
    Any posts by myself are my opinion ONLY. They should never be taken as correct or factual without confirmation from a legal professional. All information is given without prejudice or liability.

    Comment


    • #3
      Regarding the inventory,
      Basically 3 of us moved into the flat with a guy who stayed on from the original AST (the other 3 people moved out). So we began a new AST with the original guy. If the original guy had seen the inventory are we bound by it - i dont beleive he has as he doenst remember. I know none of us "new" housemates have never seen one but is it binding of 1 of the 4 has.

      Also is there any legal bumpf written in black and white stating "if there is no inventory the LL has no claim in keeping any of the deposit".

      Many Thanks

      Comment


      • #4
        I do not know the situation regarding if one of the other tenants saw it.

        With regards to legally? You can take it as virtually guaranteed that no inventory = no deposit deductions. I believe legally in a law it will state something similar to "any reasonable deductions must be backed up with evidence that such deductions arose due to the current tenants", this evidence is the inventory. However, I suppose there is nothing to say that they could have photographed every corner of the house prior to you moving in. However, I would very much doubt this, as if theyve been clumsy enough not to make an inventory, they probably wouldnt have done that either....and I doubt any form of evidence has much credibility in court unless the tenant has seen it and agreed with what it represents.

        However, are you not panicking somewhat early, you havent even moved out yet! Do you have some reason to believe that this landlord is going to screw you?
        Any posts by myself are my opinion ONLY. They should never be taken as correct or factual without confirmation from a legal professional. All information is given without prejudice or liability.

        Comment


        • #5
          Oh but having re-read your post, I believe that having started a new AST, you should have been given a new inventory. If not, then no deductions not 100% on this though
          Any posts by myself are my opinion ONLY. They should never be taken as correct or factual without confirmation from a legal professional. All information is given without prejudice or liability.

          Comment


          • #6
            I have a feeling since he's done things in odd ways and sent a really stinky letter to us telling us to tidy the house up so he could show it to prospective tenants. He told us it was a "bombsite" and that it would cost hundreds of pounds to clean. It was a complete overreaction on the grounds we had some dirty dishes and some beer bottles after having some frineds round the day before and my washing was on a clothes horse in the lounge. The whole point which he missed was that his son turned up with peopsective tenants without letting us know until that day. we also told him about his leaking shower about 5 times and when confronting his son about this, his son just said " oh you nkow dad, goes in one ear and out the other". He also said he'd clean the carpets which he never did so i assume hes going to forget about that,. I think the final issue is that he wants to come round tomorrow when everyones at work, although im going to try and get him to come in the eveing.

            Comment


            • #7
              He CANNOT enter the property without your express permission 24 hours prior. In case he does screw you for deposit and it goes further, keep a note of dates etc. Also make sure you put in writing about the shower, ask him to fix it again. He can, however, ask you to tidy the house, although I would doubt hecan force you....appreciate that it can be difficult to let an untidy house!
              Any posts by myself are my opinion ONLY. They should never be taken as correct or factual without confirmation from a legal professional. All information is given without prejudice or liability.

              Comment


              • #8
                i completely understand it can be difficult to let an untidy but giving us 24 hours notice would have prevented that. Where you refered to the legal aspect of the AST with regard to ther inventory, is that in the inventory or is it in another legal document. Also if i cant get him to come when we are all there to go through his lists, what would you suggest we do?

                Thanks again

                Comment


                • #9
                  When you say "his lists" do you mean a checklist/inventory type thing? You do not have any right to be present when he goes through this, if thats what you mean. A prudent landlord would wish the tenants to be present, but he doesnt sound like he is too prudent! The legal aspect will be not in an AST(although it will have something about the deposit there) it is actually written into property law. Someone more expert in this, like paul_f, will be able to advise you exactly which law.
                  Any posts by myself are my opinion ONLY. They should never be taken as correct or factual without confirmation from a legal professional. All information is given without prejudice or liability.

                  Comment

                  Latest Activity

                  Collapse

                  • Claiming for protected deposit
                    mandm
                    This is an interesting one, got me into a spin.
                    Tenants signed AST but decided to leave after 6 months and 3 days (problem with moving) using the break clause in the AST. I protected the deposit using DPS (Insured) and returned the deposit minus deductions when the moved out.
                    I served the...
                    21-07-2017, 08:00 AM
                  • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
                    MrShed
                    JK - there are *some* upsides of taking a deposit. The main two for me:
                    1) Regardless of what it can feel like on here, the majority of tenants do not know they can play the system in this way.
                    2) There is something to be said for the mindset of a tenant who has something "invested"...
                    21-07-2017, 08:19 AM
                  • Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                    MrShed
                    I've just posted something on GDPR and then wondered whether it had been discussed on here before - a quick search implies its never been mentioned.

                    I thought I would raise a topic to discuss it and the implications on landlords.In effect this is a replacement of the Data Protection Act...
                    20-07-2017, 15:01 PM
                  • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                    jpkeates
                    The ICO should be fining landlords for not registering as data processors - they're not.

                    The maximum amount of personal data held by landlords and agents arises out of tenant referencing, and, if that were to be destroyed after a couple of months, most landlords would arguably be pretty...
                    21-07-2017, 08:16 AM
                  • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
                    JK0
                    I'm afraid this rant won't help you much o/p, but:

                    STILL!? Still landlords are giving tenants a way to wheedle thousands out of them for no good reason?

                    I have come to the conclusion this whole deposit protection nonsense is a government sponsored scam. There is barely any...
                    21-07-2017, 08:12 AM
                  • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
                    jpkeates
                    They are probably claiming that you didn't protect the deposit and give them the Prescribed Information document, both of which you are required to do within 30 days of receipt of the deposit.

                    If you didn't do both things to the appropriate deadline, you didn't protect the deposit correctly....
                    21-07-2017, 08:09 AM
                  • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                    jjlandlord
                    Source: http://news.pwc.ch/31824/gdpr-key-ch...-eu-companies/

                    That being said, I don't think it will have much impact on landlords:



                    I don't think that'll be the case. References are legitimate and widespread.



                    ...
                    21-07-2017, 07:51 AM
                  • Help. Scam/ fraud letting
                    Hayleydenice93
                    Hiya

                    i need some advise on my situation in regards to this flat offered to me and my partner. We viewed a flat which was in an old office block which had been converted into service apartments and then refurbished into flats.

                    The agency we viewed the flats through did not want...
                    20-07-2017, 20:59 PM
                  • Reply to Help. Scam/ fraud letting
                    theartfullodger
                    You do not have to own a place to be the Landlord. Suspect they rent from owner (their Landlord), they then rent (as your Landlord) to you.

                    Doubt there's any chance of getting proper tenancy from them. You could sign licence, move in, then try and get rights as an AST Tenant (eg sue for...
                    21-07-2017, 07:46 AM
                  • Claiming for Non protected deposit
                    charliesugar
                    This is posted on behalf of my cleaner who approached me for help after her last landlord failed to reply to her repeated requests for return of her deposit.
                    She rented a room in a shared house in London, AST, weekly rent all paid on time. Notice given and accepted, room left neat and clean....
                    27-06-2017, 13:18 PM
                  Working...
                  X