I've finally got possession of my flat back, under ground 8. Despite getting a court order for rent arrears, costs etc., the tenant disappeared without paying a penny. Happens all the time, I'm sure.
One thing that makes this a little bit different is that the tenant was running a limited company from my address, and I thought it might be possible to use that to be creatively unpleasant. I'm not sure this makes sense, but this is the idea:
The tenant seems to have run companies at previous addresses, under slightly different names, and then had them struck off as dormant shortly after leaving the old addresses. He did the same thing at my address, submitting dormant accounts. I strongly suspect the current company isn't dormant, although I don't have conclusive proof.
The company is using my address as its registered office, even though the tenant has gone. So I was thinking I could get proof that the company is not dormant by invoicing it for use of my home as its office. If I deliver the invoice to the company's registered office, the company will have received it, even though the Director will know nothing about it. (There are several periods I could charge for - during the tenancy, after the possession order, after expiry of the possession order and after regaining possession, I don't know which of these I can legitimately charge for. Also, I don't want it to continue using my address).
Once the tenant either submits dormant accounts again, or applies to have the company struck off, I can then present the invoice as proof that the company is not dormant and that the Director has acted dishonestly.
I don't know how seriously Companies House or HMRC will take this. I'm hoping that, by combining this with the repeated failure to notify the change in registered office and the Director's address for service and the use of different names, they may regard it as a serious breach and force the tenant to reveal their new address so I can chase them for the arrears.
Does this make sense? Will HMRC et al take it seriously? Or should I just stick to more straightforward approaches?
One thing that makes this a little bit different is that the tenant was running a limited company from my address, and I thought it might be possible to use that to be creatively unpleasant. I'm not sure this makes sense, but this is the idea:
The tenant seems to have run companies at previous addresses, under slightly different names, and then had them struck off as dormant shortly after leaving the old addresses. He did the same thing at my address, submitting dormant accounts. I strongly suspect the current company isn't dormant, although I don't have conclusive proof.
The company is using my address as its registered office, even though the tenant has gone. So I was thinking I could get proof that the company is not dormant by invoicing it for use of my home as its office. If I deliver the invoice to the company's registered office, the company will have received it, even though the Director will know nothing about it. (There are several periods I could charge for - during the tenancy, after the possession order, after expiry of the possession order and after regaining possession, I don't know which of these I can legitimately charge for. Also, I don't want it to continue using my address).
Once the tenant either submits dormant accounts again, or applies to have the company struck off, I can then present the invoice as proof that the company is not dormant and that the Director has acted dishonestly.
I don't know how seriously Companies House or HMRC will take this. I'm hoping that, by combining this with the repeated failure to notify the change in registered office and the Director's address for service and the use of different names, they may regard it as a serious breach and force the tenant to reveal their new address so I can chase them for the arrears.
Does this make sense? Will HMRC et al take it seriously? Or should I just stick to more straightforward approaches?
Comment