If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
name of your landlord has to be on the tenancy agreement in order for it to be legal?
good source...?
hmm
i don't think so as LL frequently retain LA to act/sign on their behalf although the L&T Act stuff is right re asking for details
read the first paragraph and ask if this is a 'trusted source' or just more sad bloggers vilifying LLs due to their personal experiences
Since a tenancy agreement does not even have to be written in E&W I can't see this being correct:
However since no rent is due without an address for serving notices (which must be in E-or-W) and whoever gets the rent or acts as agent must provide actual address & landlord name within 21 days (or criminal offence) I can't see there being an issue with tenant getting landlord's name (in theory). LL&T 1987 S48.
Further, in any demand for rent LL name & address must be included: So agent can send letter saying "pay me the money" but that would be invalid without landlord name (LL&T 1987 S47) http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1987/31/section/47
I would have thought there were more pressing needs for tenants than this...
Cheers!
I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...
I can't imagine how you could enter a written contract with an unidentified other party.
Who does the agreement say you're renting the property from?
And is this still to do with your issue with a lodger?
When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).
i just dont have any detail of the landlord.
and wondered if not having a landlords name on the agreement made it void as thats what the thread implies..
I thought with it being in a section "legal" that it must be right..
yes it is to do with my lodger issues..
Who does the agreement say you're renting the property from?
When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).
If that's what is says, you are probably renting it from the agent.
Nothing to stop letting agents also being landlords.
If you know for certain that there is a landlord that the agent is representing,
the agent's made a bit of a mess of things.
When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).
Well yes i got confused because the agent has told me in person that the landlord has moved to london and that she is the agent but her name and adress is on the agreement titles "landlord"
The agent has made a bit of a mistake.
While it's possible for them to be an agent for an undisclosed party, as far as you're concerned it means that the letting agent is your landlord.
What were you hoping to achieve if the agreement had turned out to be invalid?
When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).
I guess Im just trying to learn more what my options are..
its a terribly difficult time for me at the moment with my agent ( who lives next door)
Yesterday she came into my home accusing me of illegal activity, fraud and deceit. she left saying i would hear from a solicitor and will be section 8 asked to leave
Im thinking along the lines of even if we come to an agreement and she lets me stay, is it a demo of things to come.. am i going to get stress from her a lot as she lives next door. I dont have any intention of having any dealings with someone who makes a mountain out of such a trivial matter and happens to live next door..
Well you've signed an agreement that's likely to be valid, so you can only change things if you both agree.
But it might suit both of you to cut your losses.
It might just all be a storm in a teacup, an agent can't issue a section 8 notice (or any other similar notice)
only the landlord can do that.
You don't have to let the agent or the landlord into your home if you don't want to,
and if they start to accuse you of things that aren't true ask them politely to leave and insist that they do.
I suspect (and I have no way of knowing so I am guessing) that the agent is your landlord - and they don't want you to know.
It would be an amazing coincidence to find yourself living next to your agent (and for a letting agent to want to rent out the property next door to them).
If you have paid a deposit, the landlord has to protect it and give you a formal set of documents (called the prescribed information) within 30 days of receiving it.
See who's name is on that set of forms - I haven't dealt with all of them, but the landlord is specifically required on the ones I have seen.
And if the information is incorrect (i.e. the agent has substituted their own name again) the prescribed information hasn't been served.
As others have said, you can write to the agent asking for them to confirm the name and contact address for the landlord.
They have 21 days to comply otherwise they're breaking the law.
If you want some more specific help, call shelter, who are really good at dealing with this kind of situation.
0808 800 4444.
When I post, I am expressing an opinion - feel free to disagree, I have been wrong before.
Please don't act on my suggestions without checking with a grown-up (ideally some kind of expert).
you know what jp
your suspicions may well be right...
it would explain a lot..
the contract..
how emotional she is getting about the property considering she has tons of "other" properties"
the more i think about it, the more it makes sense
The whole premise of my post is that a landlord would only be interested in pursuing a tenant through the courts if he is seeking damages above the value of the deposit.
Moreover, in the case of deposits under the insurance scheme, the landlord already has the money. Therefore, the tenant...
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that allowing arbitration through the ADR requires consent from both the tenant and the landlord. Obviously the tenants are likely to prefer this when they do not agree to a given deduction.
But what prevents a landlord from making a deduction right...
How can anyone think he's a permitted occupier?
That makes no sense.
He's either a family member making a contribution to the upkeep of somewhere or a tenant who should pay rent.
If you treat them as the latter, you're unlikely to go wrong.
This is a very messy situation. My son lived with my mother, and when she died (2016) I inherited her house. My son carried on living there and did not pay anything or make any contributions to the rent. During 2020 my circumstances changed and I needed him to pay to live there. He did pay some money...
I looked at these previously but they seem to specialise in standard cases, that can be easily won in court. Everyone I've contacted is unsure whether he's a tenant or an permitted occupier. I have a key and until last year when this started I stayed with him when I visited the north east,...
Comment