Section 21(4) Court of appeal case

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Section 21(4) Court of appeal case

    I've done some research and I thought you guys might be interested.

    Please find link for the court of appeal case from 29 March 2006. Notting Hill Housing Trust v Rumus.

    The case is similar to mine in the sense the only argument is whether the s21(4) notice was valid.

    The county court judge found for the claimant, but the tenant appealed.

    The tenant's argument was that the wording used 'at the end of' in the notice should have said 'after'.

    The court of appeal found that 'at the end of' means the same as 'after' and so found for the landlord.

    In my case I used 'on expiry of' which means the same as 'at the end of', so hopefully my case will be okay. The judge has said in my court hearing letter that he is not satisfied with my wording 'on expiry of' - so hopefully this case will satisfy him.

    I would appreciate your thoughts.

    Thanks,

    http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup...method=boolean

    #2
    I see that this relates to your previous thread about this matter

    http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums...ead.php?t=6193

    From reading the judgement, I would make use of one example that Lord Justice Dyson gave:
    the soldiers came home "at the end of the war" means that they came home after the war had ended or after the end of the war. It does not mean that they came home at the split second when the enemy surrendered
    In your case, it is true that the soldiers came home on expiry of the last day of war. It does not mean at that instant.
    On some things I am very knowledgeable, on other things I am stupid. Trouble is, sometimes I discover that the former is the latter or vice versa, and I don't know this until later - maybe even much later. Because of the number of posts I have done, I am now a Senior Member. However, read anything I write with the above in mind.

    Comment


      #3
      Thanks for your thoughts.

      Is it worth me issuing another s21(4) on a without prejudice basis in case the judge still throws this one out, or could that work against me at the court hearing if the defendant produces it?

      Is it possible to issue a second notice on a without prejudice basis or will it automatically supercede the old one? Does anyone know any good lawyers I could ask to get confirmation, even if I have to pay them a small fee?

      Thanks.

      Comment

      Latest Activity

      Collapse

      • Reply to Tenant moves his girlfriend in
        by Lawcruncher
        What do the terms of the tenancy say about occupation?...
        01-10-2020, 08:22 AM
      • Tenant moves his girlfriend in
        by Hollywood
        Hi all, I've searched for similar thread but didn't succeed.
        My Tenant of 14 months, now on a SPT, has moved his girlfriend in. I'm ok with arrangement, it was mentioned by him when he first moved in but they split and nothing happened until now. He has been a good tenant so far & kindly...
        30-09-2020, 14:12 PM
      • Reply to Ending Joint Tenancy & Agency Fees
        by Darkside
        Just thought I'd update this and summarise. Thanks for all replies so far and apologies if what I am saying is confusing (some of it doesn't really make sense to me either).
        Our previous FTA ended on 19-09-2020 between myself and two others (joint tenancy). On the 20-09-2020, one of the others...
        01-10-2020, 08:06 AM
      • Ending Joint Tenancy & Agency Fees
        by Darkside
        Hi everyone,

        I've already found a great deal of useful information on this forum so many thanks to all these knowledgable posters!

        I entered into a joint fixed term tenancy agreement with two others. The fixed term runs for 12 months and the wording in case it helps is 'The...
        06-09-2020, 08:05 AM
      • Reply to Boiler repair - tenant checked into hotel
        by tatemono
        I think you've done all you can in the situation including what many would not in offering your own facilities. I think, given the T's circumstances she would have been in her right to argue for some reduction in rent due to the inconvenience of not having all that she paid for. Perhaps you could negotiate...
        01-10-2020, 07:51 AM
      • Boiler repair - tenant checked into hotel
        by tedcbe
        Hi I have a tenant who has checked into a hotel due to the fact that the boiler broke down and says she will reduce the amount in the next month’s rent.
        I have never agreed for her to check into a hotel in the first place.
        She reported there is an issue with the heating on Sunday night...
        30-09-2020, 22:30 PM
      • Reply to Tenant moves his girlfriend in
        by tatemono
        That's the only thing we've ever done when partners move in... based on advice on these forums I should add!...
        01-10-2020, 07:46 AM
      • Reply to Deposit Protection Rules?
        by jase222
        There was a case in Bristol similar where the judge rule that the landlord was right to give the original tenant the pi only and didn't need to for a later tenant but I know there was other info about the case, worth no win no fee tho
        01-10-2020, 07:12 AM
      • Deposit Protection Rules?
        by Nips
        Hi all ex tenant here, hoping someone can help as I can't find a lot of concrete advice online. Basically, I ended a very stressful tenancy in Aug 2019. There was a lot of back and forth, unclear info, and formal complaints, plus at the end of the tenancy they scalped us with deposit deductions. Just...
        30-09-2020, 17:43 PM
      • Reply to Deposit Protection Rules?
        by MW1985
        It is worth seeking with a no win no fee firm in this scenario. I would offer my opinion to say that the LA were remiss in not providing you with the deposit information. How were you to know the details contained within the Prescribed Info?
        It sounds as if some short cuts were taken by the...
        01-10-2020, 06:05 AM
      Working...
      X