I am aware the law changed in Feb 1997 to bring in ASTs. I moved into my tenancy circa that date, I believe couple months prior to but I have no proof. Never been any tenancy agreement. For certain reasons I think Landlord probably unlikely to have record of when I moved in or have a clue how long I've been there.
Check of electoral register doesn't proof I was or wasn't there upon that date. Landlord has indicated he would like to sell now with vacant possession (I offered to buy but he wants price considerably above market value). He has not issued Notice to Quit yet. I would argue that I am an assured tenant. In that case Landlord shouldn't have any grounds for eviction as I have been model tenant throughout. Question therefore is the Judge likely to declare me an AST due to me not having proof of start date or would it be down to the landlord to prove I wasn't there prior to the law change? Does anyone know of any cases that have dealt with this issue?
I hope to be able to move out within a year anyway once I have saved up enough to buy and made arrangements for relocating my business etc. I'd rather not have to move in the interim as it would be highly difficult and distruptive for me to do so for various reasons. I thought of mentioning to him that I'll plan be gone within a year but I am reluctant to do so as I am concerned that if he wants possession sooner then that might alert him to the fact that I haven't got proof of when I moved in and thus give him confidence to initiate the eviction process (and he might not believe I plan to move out). What would you advise?
Check of electoral register doesn't proof I was or wasn't there upon that date. Landlord has indicated he would like to sell now with vacant possession (I offered to buy but he wants price considerably above market value). He has not issued Notice to Quit yet. I would argue that I am an assured tenant. In that case Landlord shouldn't have any grounds for eviction as I have been model tenant throughout. Question therefore is the Judge likely to declare me an AST due to me not having proof of start date or would it be down to the landlord to prove I wasn't there prior to the law change? Does anyone know of any cases that have dealt with this issue?
I hope to be able to move out within a year anyway once I have saved up enough to buy and made arrangements for relocating my business etc. I'd rather not have to move in the interim as it would be highly difficult and distruptive for me to do so for various reasons. I thought of mentioning to him that I'll plan be gone within a year but I am reluctant to do so as I am concerned that if he wants possession sooner then that might alert him to the fact that I haven't got proof of when I moved in and thus give him confidence to initiate the eviction process (and he might not believe I plan to move out). What would you advise?
Comment