Minimum AST length?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Minimum AST length?

    Hi,

    I'm wondering what the minimum allowable AST length is. I have a 1-bed flat in Manchester, and someone wants to rent it for 3 months only. The gentleman concerned is Indian and is working over here on an IT contract.

    Is a 3 month AST allowable/legal?

    Many thanks!

    #2
    6 months is minimum

    Comment


      #3
      Really....is it actually illegal to do a 3 month AST, or just not recommended?

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Hamario View Post
        Really....is it actually illegal to do a 3 month AST, or just not recommended?
        if you do an AST for anything less than 6 months and need to gain possession you cannot serve a S21 until 6 months have elapsed. My recommendation would be to draw up a 6 months AST and let them leave early if thats what you are happy with.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Hamario View Post
          Really....is it actually illegal to do a 3 month AST, or just not recommended?

          There is nothing preventing you from offering a short tenancy but you would not be able to claim for possession until after the 6mth mark if the tenant refused to vacate at the end of the 3mth period. In law the minimum AST is 6mths (whether written or verbal) so the earliest you could seek possession through the courts is upon expirey of 6mths!

          J

          Comment


            #6
            Hamario: if you yourself have ever lived in the flat as owner-occupier, forget use of AST. Instead, let on Standard Assured Tenancy BUT, before granting it, serve a Notice under ground 1 of Schedule 2. That Notice gives you an equivalent "right to posseession" route, similar to s.21 yet without the AST's six-month problem.
            JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
            1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
            2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
            3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
            4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

            Comment


              #7
              thanks for all the advice guys....appeciated!

              Hamario: if you yourself have ever lived in the flat as owner-occupier, forget use of AST. Instead, let on Standard Assured Tenancy BUT, before granting it, serve a Notice under ground 1 of Schedule 2. That Notice gives you an equivalent "right to posseession" route, similar to s.21 yet without the AST's six-month problem.
              Jeffrey, I have never lived in the flat myself so i guess this isn't an option.

              if you do an AST for anything less than 6 months and need to gain possession you cannot serve a S21 until 6 months have elapsed. My recommendation would be to draw up a 6 months AST and let them leave early if thats what you are happy with.
              Thanks Poppey, I think this is probably my best option and the one I'll go with.....

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by jeffrey View Post
                Hamario: if you yourself have ever lived in the flat as owner-occupier, forget use of AST. Instead, let on Standard Assured Tenancy BUT, before granting it, serve a Notice under ground 1 of Schedule 2. That Notice gives you an equivalent "right to possession" route, similar to s.21 yet without the AST's six-month problem.
                Ground 1 of Schedule 2 MUST be served in conjunction with Ground 2 and will not on its own succeed in circumventing the tenant's right to a 6 months minimum term. If the landlord is in arrears then possibly it would be, but it would have to be an amount usually equivalent to 9-12 months mortgage payments before a court will grant possession. Suggesting an Assured Tenancy is not as sensible as suggesting a tenancy at common law taking it out of the Housing Acts altogether, which doesn't even require the landlord to serve Notice to end the tenancy.

                Originally posted by smandir
                6 months is minimum
                This is rubbish!
                The advice I give should not be construed as a definitive answer, and is without prejudice or liability. You are advised to consult a specialist solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Poppy35 View Post
                  if you do an AST for anything less than 6 months and need to gain possession you cannot serve a S21 until 6 months have elapsed.
                  Agreed.

                  Originally posted by Poppy35
                  My recommendation would be to draw up a 6 months AST and let them leave early if thats what you are happy with.
                  But why not simply make it a 3-month one? As far as I'm aware there's nothing dodgy about doing that, the only proviso being that the LL accepts that he can't serve S21 until after 6 months. And it sounds like the only reason the LL wants to let for 3 months is because the tenant wants to, and if so if the tenant did overstay the 3 months it wouldn't be the end of the world.

                  I think setting up a 6-month tenancy agreement in this case will just complicate matters for no reason. Might also worry the tenant unnecessarily, into thinking he might get forced into paying for 6 months.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Paul_f View Post
                    Ground 1 of Schedule 2 MUST be served in conjunction with Ground 2 and will not on its own succeed in circumventing the tenant's right to a 6 months minimum term. If the landlord is in arrears then possibly it would be, but it would have to be an amount usually equivalent to 9-12 months mortgage payments before a court will grant possession. Suggesting an Assured Tenancy is not as sensible as suggesting a tenancy at common law taking it out of the Housing Acts altogether, which doesn't even require the landlord to serve Notice to end the tenancy.

                    This is rubbish!
                    Paul_f: your first comment is misleading. The six-month rule is specific to s.21 procedure which itself is specific to ASTs, so using SAT for shorter term (if ground 1 were applicable, which is not here the case anyway) would have avoided the rule.
                    JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                    1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                    2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                    3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                    4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Okay! but has it ever been used in your experience?
                      The advice I give should not be construed as a definitive answer, and is without prejudice or liability. You are advised to consult a specialist solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Paul_f View Post
                        Okay! but has it ever been used in your experience?
                        Answer: Yes.
                        JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                        1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                        2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                        3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                        4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Could you issue a 3 month ast with the rent paid 3 monthly in advance so after 3 months and a day and no more money had been received they would be 2 months in arraers so a S8 can be served????

                          Just a thought

                          Also I`m sure I`ve got some info on serving a s21 with a 3 month ast if i dig it out i will put it on.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by johnboy View Post
                            Could you issue a 3 month ast with the rent paid 3 monthly in advance so after 3 months and a day and no more money had been received they would be 2 months in arraers so a S8 can be served????

                            Just a thought

                            Also I`m sure I`ve got some info on serving a s21 with a 3 month ast if i dig it out i will put it on.
                            No. The "two month arrears" rule in ground 8(b) applies to a monthly rent only. For a quarterly rent, ground 8(c) requires "at least one quarter's rent [to be] more than three months in arrears".
                            JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                            1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                            2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                            3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                            4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Hamario View Post
                              Hi,

                              I'm wondering what the minimum allowable AST length is. I have a 1-bed flat in Manchester, and someone wants to rent it for 3 months only. The gentleman concerned is Indian and is working over here on an IT contract.

                              Is a 3 month AST allowable/legal?

                              Many thanks!
                              You are fine to grant him a 3 month AST. If the tenant has asked for three months only, he will probably only require it for 3 months and leave on time, without you worrying about having to evict him until after 6 months has elapsed.
                              All posts in good faith, but do not rely on them

                              * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * *

                              You can search the forums here:

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              • Reply to Property damaged. Advice please
                                by Hudson01
                                I can see that from a laymans point of view that is correct, but when you talk/deal with individuals who have attempted suicide it's simply not the case, if this was a genuine cause for concern and the Police forced entry they did it in the belief that his life was in danger, from himself probably....
                                22-01-2022, 20:56 PM
                              • Property damaged. Advice please
                                by minorbark
                                Apologies if something similar has already been covered elsewhere. I did try to search but couldn't find anything that matched my situation particularly closely. A huge thanks in advance to any of you who do take the time to read and advise.

                                TLDR version: Police have forced entry into my...
                                18-01-2022, 21:55 PM
                              • Reply to Garage left filled with tenant's goods
                                by theartfullodger
                                When I bought a house in 2000 in the Highlands it came with a garage: Which had a car in it. Belonged to a neighbour, who used it to sleep in when he'd been in the pub too late & his wife locked him out. Took me 6 months to sort...
                                22-01-2022, 18:51 PM
                              • Garage left filled with tenant's goods
                                by robbo2233
                                Hi! Hoping the forum can advise me. We have a lock-up garage in a residential estate that had been let to an individual who ceased to pay monthly rental. Notice to quit was served by our letting agents Countrywide in October, and yet the tenant's goods still remain in situ. Agents have advised...
                                20-01-2022, 21:31 PM
                              • Reply to Property damaged. Advice please
                                by Lawcruncher
                                The point here is though that the tenant's obligations under the tenancy cannot extend to repairing parts of the property which the landlord is under an obligation to repair.

                                Outside the tenancy, anyone, including a tenant, who damages property must meet the cost of repairing the damage....
                                22-01-2022, 18:45 PM
                              • Reply to Labour taxation plans
                                by theartfullodger
                                May I quote the Telegraph. on Sunak's kind gift of the highest tax burden for quite some time....

                                https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business...tax-burden-70/
                                22-01-2022, 18:10 PM
                              • Labour taxation plans
                                by steaming
                                Rachel Reeves R4 this am told the interviewer that Labour (when in power) would raise money by taxing those with BTL property much more than at present, she opined it was wrong that “they” were “getting away with it”. No challenge from BBC or fact check as to present tax. You are warned.
                                20-01-2022, 16:55 PM
                              • Reply to Labour taxation plans
                                by SouthernDave
                                The limited company system has been abused for too long by people trying to save on tax by claiming they are a company. I know loads of people of set themselves up as limted companies and have now been caught by IR35. They have spoiled it for those of us who have proper companies to rub who used to...
                                22-01-2022, 17:55 PM
                              • Reply to Labour taxation plans
                                by SouthernDave
                                Agreed. Peoples care should not be down to those who work hard, to take from their labours. The levy is a joke and im disappointed in the conservatives for doing it.
                                22-01-2022, 17:52 PM
                              • Reply to Greetings, I Come in Peace
                                by SouthernDave
                                I thought the main issue of taking a tenant on UC is not so much the fact they are receiving benefits, but the fact that its a pain in the proverbial to evict as the council tell them to sot tight until forced out by bailiffs....
                                22-01-2022, 17:47 PM
                              Working...
                              X