Carpet Replacement

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Brb
    replied
    If old carpet had reached the end of it's life (and as such unable to claim against any deposit secured on the tenancy) I would just tell Ts that you will overlook their removal of your property this time but expect them to take their carpet with them when they move and to seek permission in future.

    Leave a comment:


  • PaulF
    replied
    Originally posted by paddywack78 View Post
    I just had all my carpets replaced in my flat, only cost £430 (with mid range value). It's one bedroomed. I guess I'd be more concerned with how much T is asking for? Did they get a carpet at budget value or go all out.
    Irrelevant, as other posters have already stated. (For OP's info) BTW it has nothing to do with S.11 Landlord & Tenant Act 1985

    Leave a comment:


  • paddywack78
    replied
    I just had all my carpets replaced in my flat, only cost £430 (with mid range value). It's one bedroomed. I guess I'd be more concerned with how much T is asking for? Did they get a carpet at budget value or go all out.

    Leave a comment:


  • scrfmah
    replied
    As I stated above we don't have the money and he took the flat with the carpets like this, then took it upon himself to change them without approval from us. He is living in a dignified matter!

    Leave a comment:


  • mrcid
    replied
    If the carpets are worn and tatty and has reached the end of its life the then you ought to replace them so your tenants can live in a dignified manner.

    Leave a comment:


  • scrfmah
    replied
    Thanks folks

    He is pulling out information about what constitutes a furnished flat which I don't see its relevance.

    I don't think the carpets were unsafe (trip hazard) they were just a bit worn and tatty

    Leave a comment:


  • midlandslandlord
    replied
    Legally, T has no leg to stand on wrt reclaiming payment.

    They need to show something legally wrong with your carpet, and I don't know if they can recover costs even then.

    Are they just taking bits of text from CAB website, or have they got a real opinion from someone knowledgeable?

    ML

    Leave a comment:


  • mk1fan
    replied
    I agree with the above posts.

    I'd be interested to know what the CAB and HMRC actually said and what they were asked.

    Was there any discussion before the carpets were changed or were you just presented with the bill? If the latter then refer the tenant to Arkell v. Pressdram (1971)

    Leave a comment:


  • thesaint
    replied
    Had the tenant contacted you about the carpets prior?
    What information is he throwing at you from the C.A.B & HMRC?

    Are any of these exchanges in writing?

    Leave a comment:


  • Snorkerz
    replied
    You have no obligation to pay for unauthorised works. Do you have a deposit for when they take 'their' carpet at the end of the tenancy? And do you have a condition report from the start of the tenancy?

    Leave a comment:


  • scrfmah
    started a topic Carpet Replacement

    Carpet Replacement

    We have a flat in London that the tenant is in a AST.

    We don't have the funds to replace the carpets in the flat at the moment so the tenant took it upon himself to replace them.

    We never agreed to this however now the tenant is looking to be reimbursed. The original carpets were not great but they are the same as when he took it.

    He has now started throwing information from citizens advice and hmrc at us stating about wear and tear however I am ignoring that and basing my decision on the repairing obligations in the L&T1985.

    We are not tight we just dont have the money to do it any time in the foreseeable future as we have just paid out nearly £15k to the freeholders for work on the roof.

    What are our obligations?

Latest Activity

Collapse

Working...
X