Liability for damage to outside of building

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Liability for damage to outside of building

    I rent out a 1-bed flat in Surrey. As I live abroad I have a full contract with a letting agent to deal with any problems arising at the property. In April the letting agent informed me that he had paid for a repair to a water tank which had caused the overflow to leak. He has sent me an e-mail today saying that the Management Agents for the building want me to pay for damage caused to the exterior wall as a result of the leak in April. I have asked my agent to explain why the damage has occured (ie did the tenant not inform him of the problem or was it not repaired in a timely manner). I have buildings insurance with the Management company and as far as I am concerned I should be covered by this for any water damage (there is an excess of 250 pounds sterling). I am worried as they say scaffolding will have to be erected as my flat is on the top floor and this could be expensive. I don't think I have been negligent in any way as I have always acted swiftly to rectify problems at the flat. Has anyone else had this kind of problem or can anyone out there give me a steer as to whether I might be liable (and not covered by buildings insurance) for this kind of repair work.
    Thanks

  • #2
    Your insurance policy should definitely cover this. What surprises me is that the management company arrange the insurance with a £250 excess which is extremely high. £50 is far more reasonable. Also if they "force" you to take this policy they have vicarious liability to ensure that you are covered under such circumstances. If they say you're not I would be asking searching questions as to their suitability to manage! The cost of the erection of scaffolding should also be covered by the insurance policy. By the way, have you ever been given a copy of the policy as you're entitled to it?

    You might not know this but you can force the management company to shop around and to obtain alternative quotes for insuring the builidng under the Commonhold & Leasehold Reform Act 2002 if enough owners approach them on a collective basis. They should be informing you of your new rights too!

    You
    The advice I give should not be construed as a definitive answer, and is without prejudice or liability. You are advised to consult a specialist solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

    Comment


    • #3
      Paying For Removal Of Car

      Thanks Paul_f

      The excess is for damage caused by water - other repairs have an excess of 100 pounds. They do provide leaseholders with the insurance policy and that's why I thought I should be covered. It just seemed really odd that they are asking me to rectify the problem without even mentioning that I should be claiming through the building insurance, especially as they recently sent out a note saying that any claims should be made through them and not directly with the insurers. I've since spoken to my letting agent and he assures me that the problem is not as bad as he led me to believe in his e-mail.

      However, on a completely different item, he did mention that they had wanted to charge him/me for removal of a car which was dumped in my tenant's parking space (which is on private property). They claimed that the vehicle belonged to a former tenant of mine but my letting agent has said this is nonsense and that the car has just been dumped in a vacant spot which happens to be mine (my current tenant doesn't drive). I suggested someone contact the police to find out who the registered owner was. My letting agent said the management company had done this but apparently the police weren't interested as it is on private ground (seems a bit strange to me). My letting agent has a friend in the car trade who has agreed to move the car for free given that my only other option seems to be to pay the Council for moving it when it has nothing to do with me or any of my tenants past or present. Is it reasonable for the management company to bill a landlord for something like this? Is it reasonable for me to argue that I can't possibly be expected to ensure that noone dumps an old car in a vacant parking space that is easily accessible from the main road.

      Comment

      Latest Activity

      Collapse

      • Claiming for Non protected deposit
        charliesugar
        This is posted on behalf of my cleaner who approached me for help after her last landlord failed to reply to her repeated requests for return of her deposit.
        She rented a room in a shared house in London, AST, weekly rent all paid on time. Notice given and accepted, room left neat and clean....
        27-06-2017, 13:18 PM
      • Reply to Claiming for Non protected deposit
        mariner
        [QUOTE=charliesugar;n998575]To DIY she would need to pay a £305 court fee up front ( or I would have to lend it to her!) then there is the hassle of a court date etc NWNF at least gives her the support of someone who knows what they are doing[QUOTE]

        Really?

        AFAIK
        win...
        21-07-2017, 01:01 AM
      • Help. Scam/ fraud letting
        Hayleydenice93
        Hiya

        i need some advise on my situation in regards to this flat offered to me and my partner. We viewed a flat which was in an old office block which had been converted into service apartments and then refurbished into flats.

        The agency we viewed the flats through did not want...
        20-07-2017, 20:59 PM
      • Reply to Help. Scam/ fraud letting
        mariner
        So who owns the Freehold?
        IMO there cannot be a freehold TENANCY.
        21-07-2017, 00:24 AM
      • Agent refusing to give reference until we hand in notice
        Jenny7
        Hi, hope you can offer some insight, we are looking to move rental property due to new job starting in September in a new location.
        So thankfully we've a window to shop around to find a new place.
        We've found one suitable spot but we're still looking around, the new place has asked for credit...
        17-07-2017, 12:10 PM
      • Reply to Agent refusing to give reference until we hand in notice
        MrShed
        Couldn't agree more. How shortsighted. Unless they assume a tenant would leave with no notice and no forwarding address...
        20-07-2017, 22:47 PM
      • Reply to Agent refusing to give reference until we hand in notice
        KTC
        Going back to the OP.

        This makes zero sense. Why would the LA/LL want a notice to quit from a tenant who they don't otherwise have a problem with. The longer until the tenant provide the notice, the longer the tenant is liable for rent. The notice period given now say, or given a month...
        20-07-2017, 22:46 PM
      • Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
        MrShed
        I've just posted something on GDPR and then wondered whether it had been discussed on here before - a quick search implies its never been mentioned.

        I thought I would raise a topic to discuss it and the implications on landlords.In effect this is a replacement of the Data Protection Act...
        20-07-2017, 15:01 PM
      • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
        MrShed
        I'm not sure that calling someone's career driven information "nonsense" could be classed as anything other than an insult....
        20-07-2017, 22:41 PM
      • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
        JK0
        Not intended to be an insult. Just sad that some are so frightened of TPTB....
        20-07-2017, 22:39 PM
      Working...
      X