I'll try and outline my problem.
We entered into a joint tenancy agreement in 2008. Both husband and wife signed the AST. AST reverted to a statutory periodic after 12 months.
Anniversary date of agreement is 10th of every month. On the 6th of last month, the wife informed us, in writing, that she was moving out and she was terminating her part of the agreement.
We acknowledged the letter stating that the joint tenancy agreement would terminate on the 10th and they would need to move. We also stated that they would both remain liable for rent until the property was vacated. We also stated that the husband could contact our lettings agent, should he wish to enter into his own agreement. He has not done that and would not have qualified to rent the property as he does not work and LHA will not cover the rental amount.
We are under the impression that when we go to check out the tenants, we are going to be in the position that the husband has not moved out.
What is our legal standing regarding the property? Having researched the topic here, we understand that the husband would be a trespasser and we would have to apply to County Court for an eviction notice.
The NLA offered a different opinion in as much as there is nothing we can do and the tenancy agreement continues regardless of one party giving notice. Their advice is to issue a Section 21 notice and then proceed through the court to gain possession and rent arrears (if any).
We'd prefer to go down the trespasser route as it is a lot faster than going down the Sec 21 route.
Any comments / help appreciated.
We entered into a joint tenancy agreement in 2008. Both husband and wife signed the AST. AST reverted to a statutory periodic after 12 months.
Anniversary date of agreement is 10th of every month. On the 6th of last month, the wife informed us, in writing, that she was moving out and she was terminating her part of the agreement.
We acknowledged the letter stating that the joint tenancy agreement would terminate on the 10th and they would need to move. We also stated that they would both remain liable for rent until the property was vacated. We also stated that the husband could contact our lettings agent, should he wish to enter into his own agreement. He has not done that and would not have qualified to rent the property as he does not work and LHA will not cover the rental amount.
We are under the impression that when we go to check out the tenants, we are going to be in the position that the husband has not moved out.
What is our legal standing regarding the property? Having researched the topic here, we understand that the husband would be a trespasser and we would have to apply to County Court for an eviction notice.
The NLA offered a different opinion in as much as there is nothing we can do and the tenancy agreement continues regardless of one party giving notice. Their advice is to issue a Section 21 notice and then proceed through the court to gain possession and rent arrears (if any).
We'd prefer to go down the trespasser route as it is a lot faster than going down the Sec 21 route.
Any comments / help appreciated.
Comment