Landlord breach of contract

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Landlord breach of contract

    Hi,

    I have a friend who is a student and has signed with other students a one year rental contract for a house starting from September for one year. They have not moved into the house yet but have paid the deposit and signed the contract. In the contract that the landlord signed it was specified that he would carry out some specific work on the property and would convert a shower room into a toilet and that the work would be completed before they moved in. He signed the contract with this clause and the tenants also signed the contract. They only proceeded with the rental of this particular property because the landlord had undertaken to carry out this work. They have now been informed that the landlord got builders to quote for the work of conversion of the shower into a toilet and this is going to be too costly and he is not willing to carry out the work. He will carry out the rest of the work (which was minor cosmetic work) and he is willing to clean up the shower room and get in working order but will not convert into a toilet as agreed in the contract. My friends asked that they be compensated for this with a reduction of the rent but the landlord has refused.

    What is their position? I would have thought that as the landlord is in breach of contract if they decide not to go ahead with the rental they should have their deposit returned to them? Is that correct. However I think they do want to go ahead with the rental anyway but have asked me if they refuse to pay the stipulated rent then could they be evicted. I think they could because in this case they would also be in breach of contract but do they not have a right to be compensated for the breach of contract on the part of the landlord?

    Alternatively could they go ahead with the rental but take the landlord to court for breach of contract?

    Any advise would be much appreciated. Thanks

    #2
    What are they hoping to get out of it if they went to court?

    A rent reduction might be possible and reasonable, but I doubt it can be forced on the LL. Unilateraly deciding to reduce rent, is not advisable I would say.

    I think the best options are to either agree with the LL about a rent reduction or agree a free termination of the agreement. Maybe one could argue they are entitled to costs incurred by the LL's breach of contract, i.e. moving to another suitable property
    All views posted reflect my personal opinion only and do not constitute professional advice which I am not qualified or knowledgeable enough to provide.

    Comment


      #3
      There is at this stage no breach of tenancy but a possible breach of contract, but as this wasn't executed as a Deed then parties can withdraw and the only compensation that would even be consided is if either party suffered a loss. At this stage it appears neither party has yet suffered a loss other then the tenants' deposit. If the tenants want to withdraw they are entitled to the refund of their deposits, and that's about it.

      There is no point in considering court action as costs would outweight any advantage/disadvantage, and there is very little to dispute.
      The advice I give should not be construed as a definitive answer, and is without prejudice or liability. You are advised to consult a specialist solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

      Comment


        #4
        The students have two options:

        1) refuse to proceed with the tenancy, demand return of the deposit, and find somewhere else to rent, or
        2) proceed with the tenancy at the agreed rent.

        The other options are not viable.

        It is not an option to proceed and then to claim against the landlord. Not only would the 'compensation' involved be negligible, but I doubt they'd even win when they would have willingly proceeded with the tenancy knowing well in advance that there would be no additional toilet. When there is a breach of contract there is also an obligation to mitigate any loss consequent on the breach.

        It is not an option to proceed and then refuse to pay the full rent.

        Comment

        Latest Activity

        Collapse

        • Section 8 on tenants without deposit
          by dereham
          Hello all

          Is it difficult to evict a tenant (section 8 rent arrears) if they didn't pay a deposit when they moved in?
          It might be a silly question - I know it's a massive issue not to have protected a deposit when it comes to eviction but I can't find any info about cases where there...
          02-12-2021, 11:30 AM
        • Reply to End of tenancy questions
          by leasee123
          So is it best to serve section 21 together with a section 13? As that is the only way to ensure I can get the rent increase?...
          02-12-2021, 09:56 AM
        • End of tenancy questions
          by leasee123
          Hi,

          I am a landlord and the current tenancy is coming close to the end of the AST fixed period. I am unsure what the process is when it comes to things like increasing rent and section 21 etc. I am using an agent for tenant find and they do the negotiating with the tenants (and of course...
          01-12-2021, 21:08 PM
        • Reply to Alternative ways to enforce a Peaceable Eviction
          by bob369
          I wish to gain a court order for eviction, can that be sought in advance of the approaching Notices end date, or does he need to become a 'hold over' tresspasser before I can apply.
          Apologies that is a typo, if it wasn't for the infernal 'Moderator Approval' system being so pedantic I would have...
          02-12-2021, 09:54 AM
        • Alternative ways to enforce a Peaceable Eviction
          by bob369
          Hi,

          A Lodger (Excluded Occupier) needs to be excluded as his Notice Period has expired (one calendar month), and he refuses to leave

          I understand Police will not get involved to remove him, even though he is tresspassing, understand they view this as Civil not criminal....
          24-11-2021, 23:16 PM
        • Reply to End of tenancy questions
          by jpkeates
          You can charge them any rent that they agree to pay, otherwise, your only option to unilaterally increase the rent is a s13 notice.

          The s13 notice includes an appeals process, so you can't simply "evict" someone by charging a ludicrous rent....
          02-12-2021, 09:50 AM
        • Reply to Granting a very long AST (to a family member)
          by Section20z
          The flat's lease will likely prohibit lettings of more than a year (or class it as an assignment)
          02-12-2021, 09:44 AM
        • Granting a very long AST (to a family member)
          by meehr
          For a variety of reasons a family member is considering renting out their leasehold flat to a cousin for a long period of time - to provide security they want to grant a very long AST, like 8 years (till kids have left home basically). They both want to do this for security and avoidance of argument...
          01-12-2021, 23:27 PM
        • Reply to End of tenancy questions
          by leasee123
          But what happens if tenants don't leave (when it was originally agreed they would), can I charge them the higher rent? Because a section 13 would not have been served (given it was agreed they would leave at the end of the fixed term) would I still be allowed to charge them a higher rent?
          02-12-2021, 09:43 AM
        • Reply to who's repsponsibility
          by jpucng62
          Tenants often don't have the tools to manage large foliage or dispose of it. If I could do it without too much effort I probably would or offer to arrange for it to be done & pass on the cost. It is definitely their responsibility.
          02-12-2021, 09:20 AM
        Working...
        X