Property Guardians - legal?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by alastair_g View Post
    I don't think you would want to have persons occupying a premises on a AST.
    Of course.
    The point is that writing "this is not an AST" on the agreement does not make it so if the conditions for an AST are met.
    The same goes for licence v. tenancy.

    Here if the occupier is granted exclusive possession, pays 'rent', imho it looks like a tenancy, and thus an AST.

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by jjlandlord View Post
      The point is that writing "this is not an AST" on the agreement does not make it so if the conditions for an AST are met.
      If you include a statement in an agreement to the effect that the tenancy is not an AST it cannot be an AST. If, but for the statement, the tenancy would be an AST then it will be an assured tenancy which is not an AST.

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by Lawcruncher View Post
        If you include a statement in an agreement to the effect that the tenancy is not an AST it cannot be an AST. If, but for the statement, the tenancy would be an AST then it will be an assured tenancy which is not an AST.
        Ah yes, you're right!
        Even 'better' result, then

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by alastair_g View Post
          What would the case be based around
          Unlawful eviction.

          Comment


            #20
            I'm not a legal professional but I would think if someone signs an agreement knowing fully what they are getting into ie. occupying a property as a guardian and agreeing to a certain notice period and benefiting from cheap rent then they wouldn't have a case. Having seen a few of these agreements from different companies I can say that they all explicitly state the that the agreement does not convey any rights as a tenant.

            Would it not be similar as having a long term stay at a hotel and then just deciding to lock yourself in and not pay any of the bills, declaring yourself as a tenant ie. the initial terms were you could stay as long as you paid for?

            The fact that the government are on the side of the property owner in their anti-squatting legislation means they will also probably be on the side of the property protection industry.

            Comment


              #21
              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Street_v_Mountford

              Street v Mountford [1985] is an important House of Lords judgment in English property law. The case set out the principles the court would deploy to decide whether someone's occupation of a property amounted to a tenancy (i.e. a lease), or only a licence.
              ...etc etc...

              Doesn't matter wot they thunk...

              doesn't matter wot the paperwork says...

              why matters is what the tenancy/licence is in law...

              In the end the judge decides...

              In the case of Camelot guardians I don;t think there's been a test case...
              I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...

              Comment


                #22
                Originally posted by theartfullodger View Post
                In the case of Camelot guardians I don;t think there's been a test case...
                Indeed. And I'm betting that one would be the end of their little business...

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by alastair_g View Post

                  Would it not be similar as having a long term stay at a hotel and then just deciding to lock yourself in and not pay any of the bills, declaring yourself as a tenant ie. the initial terms were you could stay as long as you paid for?
                  https://www.landlordsguild.com/hotel...nce-or-lodger/

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by jjlandlord View Post
                    Indeed. And I'm betting that one would be the end of their little business...
                    It would probably be the end to lots of people having cheap accommodation and habitable buildings returning to un-habited or squatted.

                    I'm not against squats, but the government and media are! People complained about the squatters and now they complain about the occupiers?

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by alastair_g View Post
                      It would probably be the end to lots of people having cheap accommodation and habitable buildings returning to un-habited or squatted.
                      Hey I'm not saying that the scheme is necessarily 'bad' if it makes happy property owners and happy 'guardians'.
                      But it seems that they may be on shaky legal grounds, and so really the property owners should be careful as they are the ones who could end up with someone at their property claiming to be a tenant.

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by jjlandlord View Post
                        Hey I'm not saying that the scheme is necessarily 'bad' if it makes happy property owners and happy 'guardians'.
                        But it seems that they may be on shaky legal grounds, and so really the property owners should be careful as they are the ones who could end up with someone at their property claiming to be a tenant.
                        I'm a property guardian about to take up a new 'Licence for non-exclusive shared occupation of premises' and the paperwork states:

                        "The House of Lords has held that this sort of sharing agreement does not create a tenancy: see A G Securities Ltd v Vaughan [1990] 1 AC 417. You will, therefore, have to vacate the building as soon as the agreement is terminated."

                        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AG_Securities_v_Vaughan

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by gwendes View Post
                          I'm a property guardian about to take up a new 'Licence for non-exclusive shared occupation of premises' and the paperwork states:

                          "The House of Lords has held that this sort of sharing agreement does not create a tenancy: see A G Securities Ltd v Vaughan [1990] 1 AC 417. You will, therefore, have to vacate the building as soon as the agreement is terminated."

                          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AG_Securities_v_Vaughan
                          Their paperwork may state many things as if it were truth (it's in their interest). I'm not sure how this case would apply as it predates the Housing Act 1988.

                          Anyway, for you specifically I hope you understand that this agreement means that you will have to share the property with whomever they decide, whenever they decide, and that they can enter the premises whenever they wish.

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Originally posted by jjlandlord View Post
                            Their paperwork may state many things as if it were truth (it's in their interest). I'm not sure how this case would apply as it predates the Housing Act 1988.
                            Agreed: I'm still of the view that a test-case is needed to establish if Camelot's "license" is a license or tenancy, that HA1988 may well move the goal-posts on from "AG Securities v Vaughan", as also might OFT guidance/regulations (yes, OFT stuff is guidance only...- I refer to general OFT stuff, not just OFT356)...... time will tell...

                            Anyway, for you specifically I hope you understand that this agreement means that you will have to share the property with whomever they decide, whenever they decide, and that they can enter the premises whenever they wish.
                            Very minor disagreement: We haven't seen the full text of the purported "license" (gwendes suggest you do NOT post it as they might feel it is copyright...) but even if the "license" does assert
                            this agreement means that you will have to share the property with whomever they decide, whenever they decide, and that they can enter the premises whenever they wish.
                            then, whilst accepting it may well say that, as will all these things, only a Judge in court can finally decide what rights each party does or does not have..for any particular circumstances and any particular set of paperwork....

                            I think this thread may run for quite some time....

                            Cheers!
                            I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Article by Tessa on this at...
                              http://www.landlordlawblog.co.uk/201...at-is-the-law/

                              Perhaps someone will bring a test-case...
                              I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              • Letting agency fees after invoking break-clause
                                kaidranzer
                                Hi,

                                I'm currently in a flat with a one-year fixed term contract. There is a 6-month break-clause in place which allows me to end the agreement / contract with a 2-month notice after 6 months of occupancy.

                                I've handed in the notice however, the landlord & letting agency...
                                11-11-2018, 23:46 PM
                              • Reply to Letting agency fees after invoking break-clause
                                Sydney
                                Hi kaidranzer,

                                I'm looking to invoke the break clause in my contract and comparing the wording, it looks like I'm with the same real estate agency. Please, can you tell me what the outcome was? Did you have to pay the prorated commission? I've invoked break clauses in the past with different...
                                22-08-2019, 22:05 PM
                              • Damage to wooden worktops - 2 lodgers
                                Orangesandlemons
                                Looking for some advice.

                                I had two lodgers, I asked both of them not to put hot items / leave water on my worktops as they are oak worktops. There is now quite a bit of damage to them - 3 ring marks (looks like a mug / bowls or pan), and other water damage near the sink. Neither lodger...
                                22-08-2019, 20:50 PM
                              • Reply to Damage to wooden worktops - 2 lodgers
                                AndrewDod
                                - If you don't know who it was I can't see that you can charge anyone, but you seem to be wanting to charge one who you know was not responsible for at least part of it.

                                On the holes in the wall - it depends a little on the state of the decor and wall covering. If it is a very luxurious...
                                22-08-2019, 21:31 PM
                              • Sub-tenant refuses to pay rent
                                Joe.K
                                Hello, I'm a lead-tenant (sub-lessor) renting the entire flat from my landlord and subletting the other two bedrooms to subtenants. The landlord is aware and approved this.
                                The current sub-tenant of one of the rooms moved in 20 days ago, however he didn't sign the contract I sent him (a two months...
                                20-08-2019, 23:37 PM
                              • Reply to Sub-tenant refuses to pay rent
                                Joe.K
                                Just an update: bearing the legal limitations in mind, I presented him with two options for him to choose from: move out of the flat at the end of the month (so essentially a 9 day notice), or pay the full rent for September. I assertively told him he's not welcome here, that my preference is the first...
                                22-08-2019, 20:51 PM
                              • Agent ignoring periodic option
                                oakhill
                                My last tenant stayed for about 7 years, the last 6 being a periodic tenancy.
                                I haven't asked the current tenant but in view of his circumstances I think he will want to stay on at the end of his 1 year tenancy.
                                I've now received the following from the Agent, abbreviated to just the relevant...
                                21-08-2019, 23:11 PM
                              • Reply to Agent ignoring periodic option
                                doobrey
                                Agreed ; good idea. Having it in an email helps because it is there in black and white. Persist, and if you get fobbed off, escalate the query. If agent has made such as assertion they should be able to justify it....
                                22-08-2019, 20:22 PM
                              • bugs and insects
                                Bobby Bakshi
                                I have a new tenant and she is complaining about small insects in the flat. I found one tiny one on the ceiling. She is saying there are more but I cannot see them. Is this my responsibility or hers, she has just moved in.
                                22-08-2019, 18:51 PM
                              • Reply to bugs and insects
                                AndrewDod
                                The average normal home has hundreds of species of insects and thousands of individual creatures. It is totally normal. If there are no insects at all, the place would have to be so filled with pesticides that they would pose a massive danger to health.

                                Only a few kinds are bad. Bed bugs...
                                22-08-2019, 19:55 PM
                              Working...
                              X