Faulty wood burner

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Faulty wood burner

    Hi everyone,

    Would be grateful if someone could give me some advice on the following matter.

    Our property has a wood burning stove. We arranged for the landlord to have the chimney swept before winter a few months ago and the chimney sweep told us that the chimney couldn't be swept because the flue on the stove was too small.

    The landlord called out a HETAS registered engineer referred to by the chimney sweep who confirmed that the stove did not comply with building regs (landlord owns a construction company so should know this). Apparently we're supposed to have a certificate to show that it complies.

    When I informed the landlord of this and asked him to make the fire place safe and legal and to provide me with certificate to show that it conforms with building regs, he has decided to remove it althogether instead of paying to make it safe.

    Can he do this? I signed a contract this year unfurnished, but including fixtures and fittings. Can the landlord just remove the stove (I have central heating, but wood is much cheaper) as I rented the property partly due to the fireplace?

  • #2
    Is the wood burner identified specifically on the inventory ?

    As you DON'T have a certificate for the woodburner the next obvious question is.....is there a valid gas safety certificate ?

    Comment


    • #3
      the flue on the stove was too small.
      That does not sound right, sweeps have brushes of all sizes, down to 2 or 3 inches I think. Presumably the fire was fitted and was working before so what's changed? Building regs may have changed since the fire was fitted but that does not automatically make the fire dangerous.
      I offer no guarantee that anything I say is correct. wysiwyg

      Comment


      • #4
        Unfortunately not as I moved in 4 years ago and the wood burner was installed 2 years ago. I don't have a gas certificate as I have oil central heating, which doesn't require one. The boiler broke two years ago as it had never been serviced and now I have to phone up annually to make sure it is serviced, which I shouldn't have to do really.

        Landlord seems to do as little as possible and he should know better as he has over 100 properties and a whole team dealing with his lettings - unfortunately I'm too lowly to be able to speak to him directly so have to go to a go between...

        Comment


        • #5
          The fire has a 4 inch flue, which opens into the chimney, which has a 12" flue. The size of the brush that fits through the 4" flue will therefore not touch the side of the actual chimney.

          We used the wood burner for two years after installation before and were there when they installed it. Only realised once my parents had one installed that it need to conform to building regs and have a certificate.

          Also have family in the building trade who told us that they also had to inform the council, which hasn't been done.

          Comment


          • #6
            OK. I understand there is a product that will get rid of any build up of soot in the chimney, I have no idea what it's called but it needs to be put in the fire and ignited then it burns away the contaminants, someone will know what it's called.

            Ps. Don't burn pine wood or palletes.
            Last edited by jta; 20-12-2011, 19:53 PM. Reason: Ps.
            I offer no guarantee that anything I say is correct. wysiwyg

            Comment


            • #7
              errr, the stove is a multi-fuel burner so we have burnt coal and wood on it. According to building regs, the chimney needs to be able to be accessed for sweeping (have researched quite a lot about wood burners).

              Also, a wood burning stove puts 80% of heat into room and only 20% up chimney, which means that a lot of tar builds up in the chimney due to condensation - problem with a 4" flue going into a larger flue is that soot, etc falls onto the register plate around the flue coming out of the stove. As this can't be swept as it's underneath where the brush comes out of the stove flue it presents a real risk of chimney fire.

              As to the pine and pallets - soft wood is good for starting the fire and then hard wood once it's going. Just annoyed that the landlord is removing it altogether rather than making it safe - he knew that it didn't meet requirements when he installed it - just hoped we didn't know legislation. Now we're wise he's removing it to cover his back instead of paying an engineer to make it safe and legal.

              The flue has come away from the register plate due to the bodge installation so that if we try and use it, the room fills with smoke. Have underfloor heating downstairs, which uses about £120 heating oil per month to heat as it's terribly inefficient, which is why I wanted him to repair the burner so we could heat the downstairs with wood as we have done the last two winters.

              Pretty disappointed to say the least when I've paid him about £50K in rent so far.

              Comment


              • #8
                LL is only required to provide space heating & hot water (oil c/h?)
                If wood burner does not appear on move-in inv then T is exoneated from its removal IMO and LL can remove without discussion if installed by LL or without LL express permission.
                Lord Denning (court of Appeal) decided that routine maintenance eg chimney sweeping is Ts resp. I know of no leg that requires T to have Cert for flue compliance, other than GSC requirements. LL may have breached bldg regs but that is matter between LL & Council.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Thanks for the reply. The certificate is not for me, but for the property (it's a fixed metal plate)- building regs. As you say the landlord has breached building regs, which is a matter between him and the council, but in doing so has failed in his duty of care for my health and safety, which he is responsible for as the landlord.

                  It's also not possible to put in any legally binding contract to have the tenant be responsible for sweeping the chimney due to the landlord passing his duty of care onto the tenant, but that's not an issue here. LL was happy to sweep the chimney - just not fix the fire - that reminds me - need to arrange to have the boiler serviced!

                  We're moving soon anyway...

                  Cheers ta!

                  Comment

                  Latest Activity

                  Collapse

                  • Referencing question
                    kangoo1
                    A couple wants to rent from me, she is on maternity leave and will not be returning to her previous employment, he is permanently employed and moving due to a job transfer. I have referenced him for the full rent and his guarantor has been successfully referenced.
                    I am going to prepare the ast...
                    22-07-2017, 17:19 PM
                  • Claiming for protected deposit
                    mandm
                    This is an interesting one, got me into a spin.
                    Tenants signed AST but decided to leave after 6 months and 3 days (problem with moving) using the break clause in the AST. I protected the deposit using DPS (Insured) and returned the deposit minus deductions when the moved out.
                    I served the...
                    21-07-2017, 08:00 AM
                  • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
                    JK0
                    I'll leave it at that. I'm not going to get into one of JPK's interminable arguments.
                    22-07-2017, 16:28 PM
                  • Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                    MrShed
                    I've just posted something on GDPR and then wondered whether it had been discussed on here before - a quick search implies its never been mentioned.

                    I thought I would raise a topic to discuss it and the implications on landlords.In effect this is a replacement of the Data Protection Act...
                    20-07-2017, 15:01 PM
                  • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                    jpkeates
                    That's simply one of the Schedule 2 exemptions which, if met, allows a process using personal data at all - all the other principles still apply in parallel (where it can be stored, be not excessive, kept up to date etc).

                    So, while it might be OK because it relates to a contract, there...
                    22-07-2017, 15:22 PM
                  • Excessive estate agent fees
                    Cml241
                    I have a property which I started renting out via an agency. When the contract started, they found new tenants, did the relevant checks etc and charged an upfront fee which equates to approx one month's rent. As one year has almost passed, the agent has approached me asking if I want them to 'renegotiate'...
                    21-07-2017, 16:26 PM
                  • Reply to Excessive estate agent fees
                    mariner
                    A new 12 month fixed term does provide LL & T with extra security but can lead to complications for either if their resp circumstances/legislation change during the new AST.
                    Personally, I would prefer if a orig AST was for a fixed 6 month term, followed by an SPT that required both LL &...
                    22-07-2017, 14:09 PM
                  • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                    jjlandlord
                    In this case there should be no problem because:...
                    22-07-2017, 12:30 PM
                  • Reply to Excessive estate agent fees
                    jpkeates
                    I'm not sure they're "lying", they're just making some assumptions.

                    The agent can't decide if something is "too" risky or not - there are upsides and downsides to having a new fixed term agreement, and they're right to point out, for example, that the income would be...
                    22-07-2017, 12:28 PM
                  • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                    jpkeates
                    Unless the tenant has given consent for the data to be used in this way, probably.

                    There's a grey area with this kind of data, because it's obviously been obtained for a purpose (which is to facilitate the renting of a property) and that's what it's being used for.
                    There's usually...
                    22-07-2017, 12:23 PM
                  Working...
                  X