Tenant changed mind about moving in - can I keep their deposit?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tenant changed mind about moving in - can I keep their deposit?

    Hi everyone, I signed up to ask for advice on a conflict with a tenant:

    A new tenant agreed to move into my property and at that time I agreed (via email) to perform some repairs/maintenance and clean the flat prior to them moving in. We agreed a moving in date and they paid their deposit. The tenant also agreed to pay the first month's rent before moving in.

    As moving in day approached the tenant emailed to say they were not happy with the quality and completeness of my repairs/maintenance and that the flat was dirty. They had not paid the first months rent which I then requested. They refused to pay until I sorted out the problems. At this point communications broke down until (a week after moving in date had passed) the tenant emailed to say they no longer wanted the property. They asked for the desposit back and requested I let them know what to do with the keys (which I had given them in advance of the moving in date as the flat was empty).

    To avoid hassle I agreed to this and requested they drop the keys back at the flat. 20 days later the tenants notify me that they have not received the deposit back - I tell them I have not paid it because the keys have not been returned. They then say they have not returned the keys because they have not had their deposit! So we are at deadlock.. Am I right to keep their deposit? If they do not return the keys in a reasonable time am I right to change the locks and use their deposit for that purpose?

    How would this stand in a small claims court?

    Apologies for the lengthy first post,


  • #2
    Is there any evidence that prosp T entered property on/after designated move-in date? If No & since no rent was paid, no T exists but there is a Contract to supply/accept. You may be able to sue for this breach of Contract and claim nominal rent until keys returned + cost of re-marketing from deposit. I cannot predict any Judge's mindset.
    Golden rule - no signed AST, no keys


    • #3
      Hi, thanks for the reply.

      No the tenant has NOT been to flat on or after the move in date. There was no written/signed contract, only a verbal agreement - will this matter?


      • #4
        Personally if you are certain that a tenancy has not started then I would simply change the locks. That would put you in a much better position depending what they signed to keep reasonable costs you have had by not having tenants. Or change them then return all deposit and move on.


        • #5
          What is to stop you meeting at the property and exchanging keys/cheque?


          Latest Activity


          • Claiming for protected deposit
            This is an interesting one, got me into a spin.
            Tenants signed AST but decided to leave after 6 months and 3 days (problem with moving) using the break clause in the AST. I protected the deposit using DPS (Insured) and returned the deposit minus deductions when the moved out.
            I served the...
            21-07-2017, 08:00 AM
          • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
            It was the situation predicted by some Judges et al when it was first proposed that the full Penalty would be awarded to the T and not the Exchequer.
            22-07-2017, 01:16 AM
          • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
            I agree. It's almost at the level of scandal as the people claiming cash by pretending they were ill on holiday. In that case, the Spanish Hotels have told tour operators they won't be doing all inclusive holidays any more.

            Therefore, I suggest landlords take a page out of their book, and...
            21-07-2017, 22:22 PM
          • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
            Letter sent with the evidence attached.
            Slightly off topic, it seems there this deposit protection appears to have gathered conflicting views.
            I would have thought that the purpose of the legislation was the protection of T's money, which most law-abiding landlords do but it seems that its...
            21-07-2017, 21:20 PM
          • Landlord threatening to sue after end of tenancy
            Our tenancy has just ended. We have cleaned the property from top to bottom using professional cleaners to do this and clean the carpets. He suggested this hadn't been done and wanted the name of our contractor to check which we gave him. The contractor assured him that after eight years the carpets...
            08-03-2017, 00:45 AM
          • Reply to Landlord threatening to sue after end of tenancy

            Our adjudication has just come through and the landlord has been given a token payment with the majority of our large deposit being returned to us. He was told that he had not submitted appropriate evidence for the misuse of the property and that things he was saying were wrong...
            21-07-2017, 20:49 PM
          • Deposit at the end of AST. Also, quiet enjoyment.
            Q1 – Where is the rented property located (England / Wales / Scotland / N Ireland)?

            Q2 – What type of Tenancy Agreement (TA) is this e.g. sole tenant / multiple tenant / room only?

            Q3 – What date did current TA start dd/mm/yy?
            21-07-2017, 15:06 PM
          • Reply to Deposit at the end of AST. Also, quiet enjoyment.
            Thanks for the reply jp....
            21-07-2017, 18:32 PM
          • Reply to Deposit at the end of AST. Also, quiet enjoyment.
            Makes sense - if the tenancy agreement doesn't say you have to let him and a surveyor in, his only right of access is with 24 hours written notice for the purpose of viewing the "condition and state of repair" of the property.

            So you can simply decline or make your point.
            21-07-2017, 18:23 PM
          • Reply to Deposit at the end of AST. Also, quiet enjoyment.
            I'm not trying to claim for breach of quiet enjoyment. He wants to be in again with a surveyor to use his property as security for something. I am going to let him I just want to remind him and have all the facts. Sorry if I didn't explain it right.

            Only claiming for the non protection...
            21-07-2017, 18:08 PM