Evicting a Housing Benefit Tenant.. with a twist

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Evicting a Housing Benefit Tenant.. with a twist

    Hi everyone,

    Hope you can help.

    I have had a housing benefit tenant for a while now. She has been very good and paying on time. However, I have informed her that as I plan to get married soon, I will need the property back otherwise I will be out on the street (a bit dramatic i know). Anyway, She was fine with it and we are on great terms.

    She went to her local council and they informed me they needed formal eviction procedures. So I handed a Section 21 Notice with more than 3 months notice to expire in May this year. She passed this to the council and they acknowledged the document.

    The council then stated that they would only find alternative accomodation for my tenant once they receive a court order.

    I am unsure what I need to do next. Up until this point, I believe I have done everything by the book. However my concerns are:

    1. Can I evict a Housing Benefit tenant on the grounds that I simply want the property back.

    2. As she has paid rent on time every month, does that give no chance in the courts?

    3. If the above 2 points are ok, what do I need to do next? I heard that the accelerated possession order procedure has changed! I have all the necessary documents and evidence to start this.

    4. How long will take till i can get the court order!!

    Hope the above makes sense.

    Look forward to hearing from anyone that can shine a light!

    Thanks

  • #2
    A "Housing benefit tenant" is no different to any other.
    A Section 21 notice is a "no fault" notice. It just means that you require your property back.

    The council may well re-house your tenant before the courts order it.

    Are you 100% certain that it has been served correctly? If so.

    Make an application to court now.
    Once you have done so, inform the housing benefit department, and take a copy of the court papers into their office for them to have.

    This should then put a rocket up them. Also, tell the tenant to contact them regularly saying that the threat of eviction has so far cost them the costs of your court application(£175.00) and the costs will grow if they are forced to wait until the bailiffs remove them.

    Hopefully, you will get your property back before then, but be prepared to have to wait until they are "forcibly" removed.
    Allow tenants to protect their own deposits. I want free money when they do it wrong

    Comment


    • #3
      thesaint. thank you....

      I have gone over the necessary documents and i have done it all by the book but the looks of it.

      Couple of more questions for you...

      1. Does it matter than the S21 notice expired at the end of may?

      2. Do I give the HB department the papers once they are processed by the court or before (like a copy).

      2. Do you know how long the process takes from application to completion?

      3. When you mean forcibly removed.. essentially, do you mean the council rehousing them or when a court order comes through?

      Thank you for your advice so far... its put my mind at ease.. what would my wife to be think if it is a problem we couldnt have our own place!!!!

      Comment


      • #4
        This is taken from Hansard

        http://www.publications.parliament.u...t/51025h04.htm

        The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (Jim Fitzpatrick);

        In the case of Birmingham, my hon. Friend has cited examples from his constituents who advise him that they have been told by the city council to stay put in their homes until the bailiffs arrive—examples which add up to bad practice. I share his objectives of wanting to tackle bad practice; that is why officials are working closely with local authorities to improve their understanding of the causes of homelessness and the successful solutions they can put in place to address them.

        My hon. Friend will appreciate that I am unable to comment on the individual cases he mentioned, but our policies and guidance for local authorities on how they should be tackling and preventing homelessness are clear. Local authorities should provide people with support to prevent homelessness at the earliest possible opportunity. This may involve helping tenants to continue to live in their current accommodation where possible or helping them to find alternative accommodation. It is not good practice simply to advise homeless applicants to remain in a property until eviction and we advise against that. For example, authorities could consult landlords to come to a mutual agreement which could allow a tenant to continue to occupy the accommodation for a reasonable period—and continue to pay rent—until the authority is able to help to find alternative accommodation. Hopefully, in this way the need for a possession order can be avoided and there will be a solution that meets the needs of all parties.


        Which council is it?- feel free not to answer if it jeopordises your situation.

        Comment


        • #5
          Just one additional point, if you do intend to use the court route to gain possession. Did you take a deposit from the tenant at the start of the tenancy? If so, have you protected it in a govenment scheme AND given the tenant the prescribed information from that scheme? If not, then your S21 is invalid and will need to be issued again.

          Comment


          • #6
            Please correct me if I get something wrong. Until now she's been renting privately, but now that you want the property back the preferred option is for her to rent from the council, not seek a private landlord. In order to gain sufficient priority from the council, you and her will work together to have her evicted by the courts.

            Have I got that straight? Because if I did, then I think she is abusing the system and you are facilitating this! Who is she that she deserves priority over people who have in many cases waited many years to get a council home the honest way?

            She should rent privately while have her name on a waiting list, like everybody else and not abuse a mechanism which is meant to keep people in dire straits from ending up on the streets!

            Comment


            • #7
              Lesleyanne.. Seems like i have to go through the court route to regain possession as that is how the council will allow things to proceed.

              There was no deposit as the tenant found the property and not the council... unstead they have signwd a rent guarantee form which will ensure rents are paid. i made sure this was a legitimate alternative.

              Hope that clears that up

              R

              Comment


              • #8
                Boletus.... No problem... the council is the london borough of ealing.

                Do you think i should draft a letter to them.. if so.. what do you think it should consist if?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Armin... Not at all. She has always been a council tenant.. Or rather, housing benefit.

                  No one has been cheating the system.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Armin View Post
                    Have I got that straight? Because if I did, then I think she is abusing the system and you are facilitating this! Who is she that she deserves priority over people who have in many cases waited many years to get a council home the honest way?
                    You are correct and unfortunately that is the way it works. Councils/Housing Associations will only re-home tenants who have been formally evicted. It happens all the time and is probably working the system, but the way the council criteria is set, that is the way it is done. Ultimately, LL wants their property back, and only way to get tenant to leave is by court order (councils actually advise tenants to sit tight and wait for this to happen so it is not altogether the LL's fault), so that is they way the LL has to go to secure possession of their property!

                    It may not altogether work in tenant's favour though, as they will likely be offered properties in areas other than those they choose, and could even be given emergency hostel/B&B type accommodation if council has nothing else.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by rizkyy View Post
                      thesaint. thank you....

                      I have gone over the necessary documents and i have done it all by the book but the looks of it.

                      Couple of more questions for you...

                      1. Does it matter than the S21 notice expired at the end of may?
                      No, if it has been served correctly, it is valid "forever".

                      Originally posted by rizkyy View Post

                      2. Do I give the HB department the papers once they are processed by the court or before (like a copy).
                      Give them a copy after, as this shows that you have started the process to have them removed. Tell the tenant to also put pressure on them to try and rehouse them.

                      Originally posted by rizkyy View Post

                      2. Do you know how long the process takes from application to completion?
                      Months. How many? Good question.

                      Originally posted by rizkyy View Post

                      3. When you mean forcibly removed.. essentially, do you mean the council rehousing them or when a court order comes through?
                      Whichever comes first.
                      Allow tenants to protect their own deposits. I want free money when they do it wrong

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by boletus View Post
                        This is taken from Hansard

                        http://www.publications.parliament.u...t/51025h04.htm

                        The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (Jim Fitzpatrick);

                        In the case of Birmingham, my hon. Friend has cited examples from his constituents who advise him that they have been told by the city council to stay put in their homes until the bailiffs arrive—examples which add up to bad practice. I share his objectives of wanting to tackle bad practice; that is why officials are working closely with local authorities to improve their understanding of the causes of homelessness and the successful solutions they can put in place to address them.

                        My hon. Friend will appreciate that I am unable to comment on the individual cases he mentioned, but our policies and guidance for local authorities on how they should be tackling and preventing homelessness are clear. Local authorities should provide people with support to prevent homelessness at the earliest possible opportunity. This may involve helping tenants to continue to live in their current accommodation where possible or helping them to find alternative accommodation. It is not good practice simply to advise homeless applicants to remain in a property until eviction and we advise against that. For example, authorities could consult landlords to come to a mutual agreement which could allow a tenant to continue to occupy the accommodation for a reasonable period—and continue to pay rent—until the authority is able to help to find alternative accommodation. Hopefully, in this way the need for a possession order can be avoided and there will be a solution that meets the needs of all parties.


                        Which council is it?- feel free not to answer if it jeopordises your situation.

                        One of the most useful responses in some time.
                        Glad to see councils being reminded that their encouragement and condoning of eviction is a farce. To many tenants who are ousted through a legitimate section21 notice, rather than through their own fault (arrears, asb, etc), having a court order against them is an abomination.
                        I may be a housing professional but my views, thoughts, opinions, advice, criticisms or otherwise on this board are mine and are not representative of my company, colleagues, managers. I am here as an independent human being who simply wants to learn new stuff, share ideas and interact with like minded people.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by thesaint View Post
                          No, if it has been served correctly, it is valid "forever".



                          Give them a copy after, as this shows that you have started the process to have them removed. Tell the tenant to also put pressure on them to try and rehouse them.



                          Months. How many? Good question.



                          Whichever comes first.
                          Thank you for this... just to re-iterate, the process I have carried out with regards to my S21 has been spot on.

                          However, when I signed via the council, I signed a rent guarantee form instead of a deposit (naturally, as the tenant is via Housing Benefit and thus wouldnt be able to pay). It shouldnt be a problem should it?

                          I have all forms, witness statements and documents needed. Its just the deposit thats the issue?

                          Sorry if i am repeating myself.. just want to be sure.

                          Thanks

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by LesleyAnne View Post
                            It may not altogether work in tenant's favour though, as they will likely be offered properties in areas other than those they choose, and could even be given emergency hostel/B&B type accommodation if council has nothing else.
                            Not just that, the tenant also faces difficulties to ever rent privately again. What will they say when a tenant referencing service (or potential landlord) asks "Have you ever been evicted" ? Lie?

                            The court case will also be matter of public record. The other day I used a tenant reference service and got back a neat report which included court case numbers. Based on the information provided I stopped considering that tenants application.

                            I can only reiterate that I consider people on benefits forcing an eviction in order to get priority housing to be abusing the system and so are landlords who are in cahoots with such tenants.

                            But I believe that people get what's coming to them. She might save herself some money by abusing the system to get priority housing, but she might get well get stuck in the same hole for the rest of her life.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by rizkyy View Post
                              However, when I signed via the council, I signed a rent guarantee form instead of a deposit (naturally, as the tenant is via Housing Benefit and thus wouldnt be able to pay). It shouldnt be a problem should it?
                              The courts are interested in any monies paid as a deposit are protected.
                              There is nothing to protect, as no monies were paid.
                              Allow tenants to protect their own deposits. I want free money when they do it wrong

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              • Mice in the flat - what to do?
                                JP23
                                We have had mice for a while now. There's only one or two that we see (we're not overrun) but still, they've left urine stains in our cupboard and behind the skirting it's ridiculously filthy and soiled.

                                Are we legally able to pay for a cleaner then subtract it from our rent next month...
                                26-07-2017, 06:02 AM
                              • Freeholder Scaffolding Over My Flat
                                Jcg76
                                I have a leasehold studio flat with a garden in London that I rent out to tenants.
                                Recently, the freeholder gave me three days notice that he was extending part of the building my flat is joined to and he would need to put scaffolding on my flat roof and in my garden. I immediately objected saying...
                                24-07-2017, 21:20 PM
                              • Reply to Freeholder Scaffolding Over My Flat
                                Jcg76
                                Are you effectively saying it is standard for a freeholder to have access to build?
                                I have looked at the lease, can anyone advise on someone that make the lease clear to me?...
                                26-07-2017, 06:01 AM
                              • Tenant application form
                                Elum
                                Hi all!

                                So we are just about to put our flat on the market to rent is there anywhere we can get a ODF application form that we can email to any prospective tenants?

                                Thanks in advance,

                                Liam.
                                25-07-2017, 20:14 PM
                              • Reply to Tenant application form
                                AndrewDod
                                You really need two forms.
                                a) A simple one for first-pass selection containing your basic questions. The point of this one is to help you decide if you are going to waste any time at all (and the tenant's time), even on a viewing.
                                b) A much more complicated one (have you ever failed to leave...
                                25-07-2017, 23:54 PM
                              • Reply to Freeholder Scaffolding Over My Flat
                                leaseholder64
                                I would expect any competent solicitor to have drafted the lease to give as many rights of access for building and repair as the freeholder was likely to want. You'd need to look at the lease to know.
                                25-07-2017, 22:57 PM
                              • Non- protected deposit, and disputes
                                Stybdmy
                                Q1 – Where is the rented property located? England

                                Q2 – What type of Tenancy Agreement (TA) is this? Multiple tenants (a couple) - one tenancy agreement

                                Q3 – What date did current TA start 01/11/2016

                                Q4 – How long was initial fixed term 6 months
                                ...
                                24-07-2017, 12:25 PM
                              • Reply to Non- protected deposit, and disputes
                                KTC
                                If by that you meant that an application have been made for voluntary striking off the company from the register, then you need to contact Companies House to object to it on the grounds that 1) it has traded or otherwise carried on business within the last 3 months 2) that you are a creditor and that...
                                25-07-2017, 22:55 PM
                              • Burglary Damage - Who Pays?
                                Pb21
                                Our rented flat was broken into, in the process the Yale lock was broken and cost £100 to repair. The landlord is refusing to pay this on the basis we didn’t also lock the door with the mortice lock. We didn’t use the mortice lock as it wasn’t working although the landlord did not know this....
                                25-07-2017, 11:40 AM
                              • Reply to Burglary Damage - Who Pays?
                                bergerac
                                Would the same ring true if a tree had crushed the roof? Or some non-act of God event? Surely there is a limit to where the tenants responsibility ends and the landlord's begins?...
                                25-07-2017, 22:07 PM
                              Working...
                              X