Can I seize tenants goods for non payment of court costs & rent arrears

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Can I seize tenants goods for non payment of court costs & rent arrears

    Afternoon forum,

    I am due to evict my current tenant (with bailiff in tow) this Tuesday.
    My question is if I am entitled to seize the tenant's belongings for non payment of rent arrears & court fees which she is liable for. I have spoken to her about this & she has stated that she is 'not concerned' about making any payments for arrears or court costs seeing as she will no longer be living at my property(charming)!

    I would like to know if I have grounds to instruct the bailiff to seize her goods based on having a possession warrant. Or do I really need to
    spend some more money to have a Warrant of Execution order granted. I
    have already obtained an order for her to attend court for questioning. As she works I feel that pursuing an AOE will be my best route, however Iam hoping that someone has had this dilemma and maybe able to shed some
    light on whether seizing her goods at the eviction is allowed.

    I know she has no where to store her things as the council are due to re-house her when she is evicted, and they have failed to provide her with storage, which she allegedly had paid them to do!

    Any one have any experience or similar situation to my pending Eviction
    dilemma?

  • #2
    I can drive down the M4 @ 120 but may not.

    If you steal tenants belongings hopefully you'll end up with a criminal record.

    Concentrate on getting t out with minimal fuss & argument, then use time(yours), ££,cunning & patience to track Tenant down & recover your funds.. (like a few of us have)

    If you ever then see Tenant wave with a cheery smile & thank them for their money : Really winds 'em up...
    I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...

    Comment


    • #3
      It is possible Bailiff will evict T but not Ts belongings from property, or will leave them outside the property in garden. If the former, you may have to store them for up to 3 months before disposal, if the latter, Council may require LL to remove dumped furniture at own expense as the T has ended.
      What makes tou think T will have anything of value in propery on eviction day? the 50" plasma and BMW will be nowhere in sight!

      Comment


      • #4
        If your tenant leaves/is removed from the property without taking their goods with them, you may find this information sheet useful :

        http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/uncollected_goods.htm
        'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by bandontherun
          English law is rightly or wrongly greatly in favour of tenants. ...........
          Errr... not since HA 1988 (Thatcher..) which someone (Westminster?? Lawcruncher??) summed up better than I by noting (roughly) that it changed PRS from the provision of homes for humans to the provision of income for investors... (anyone got the original quote please??)

          You've not heard of Section 21 & booting out innocent, excellent, tenants for no reason at all??
          I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...

          Comment

          Latest Activity

          Collapse

          • Referencing question
            kangoo1
            A couple wants to rent from me, she is on maternity leave and will not be returning to her previous employment, he is permanently employed and moving due to a job transfer. I have referenced him for the full rent and his guarantor has been successfully referenced.
            I am going to prepare the ast...
            22-07-2017, 17:19 PM
          • Claiming for protected deposit
            mandm
            This is an interesting one, got me into a spin.
            Tenants signed AST but decided to leave after 6 months and 3 days (problem with moving) using the break clause in the AST. I protected the deposit using DPS (Insured) and returned the deposit minus deductions when the moved out.
            I served the...
            21-07-2017, 08:00 AM
          • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
            JK0
            I'll leave it at that. I'm not going to get into one of JPK's interminable arguments.
            22-07-2017, 16:28 PM
          • Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
            MrShed
            I've just posted something on GDPR and then wondered whether it had been discussed on here before - a quick search implies its never been mentioned.

            I thought I would raise a topic to discuss it and the implications on landlords.In effect this is a replacement of the Data Protection Act...
            20-07-2017, 15:01 PM
          • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
            jpkeates
            That's simply one of the Schedule 2 exemptions which, if met, allows a process using personal data at all - all the other principles still apply in parallel (where it can be stored, be not excessive, kept up to date etc).

            So, while it might be OK because it relates to a contract, there...
            22-07-2017, 15:22 PM
          • Excessive estate agent fees
            Cml241
            I have a property which I started renting out via an agency. When the contract started, they found new tenants, did the relevant checks etc and charged an upfront fee which equates to approx one month's rent. As one year has almost passed, the agent has approached me asking if I want them to 'renegotiate'...
            21-07-2017, 16:26 PM
          • Reply to Excessive estate agent fees
            mariner
            A new 12 month fixed term does provide LL & T with extra security but can lead to complications for either if their resp circumstances/legislation change during the new AST.
            Personally, I would prefer if a orig AST was for a fixed 6 month term, followed by an SPT that required both LL &...
            22-07-2017, 14:09 PM
          • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
            jjlandlord
            In this case there should be no problem because:...
            22-07-2017, 12:30 PM
          • Reply to Excessive estate agent fees
            jpkeates
            I'm not sure they're "lying", they're just making some assumptions.

            The agent can't decide if something is "too" risky or not - there are upsides and downsides to having a new fixed term agreement, and they're right to point out, for example, that the income would be...
            22-07-2017, 12:28 PM
          • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
            jpkeates
            Unless the tenant has given consent for the data to be used in this way, probably.

            There's a grey area with this kind of data, because it's obviously been obtained for a purpose (which is to facilitate the renting of a property) and that's what it's being used for.
            There's usually...
            22-07-2017, 12:23 PM
          Working...
          X