Landlords views on tenancy in one persons name, although two adults will be there

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Landlords views on tenancy in one persons name, although two adults will be there

    Dear Forum;

    On a similar thread to a previous post I have made. Situation is I have a bad credit rating (due to a failure of my company), my partner a good one. We are both though now employeed and have never missed payments with rent before, which I would like to think our current landlord will be able to confirm.

    I am thinking it might be simpler for a new tenancy to be applied for in my partners name only, but I expect this might not be desired by letting agents or landlords.

    What are landlords views on this?


  • #2
    I am aware of opposing views on this. Some, including myself, would welcome an honest tenant who presents reasons for previous financial problems (businesses do not always fail through incompetence, sometimes they fail through simple economics - or pubcos shafting tenants!)
    Some landlords would welcome both partners on the tenancy as it doubles the chances of rent recovery opportunities. Some landlords prefer one tenant as it's easier to deal with if the partnership fails and one leaves.
    Seek an outstanding reference and let your new landlord decide.
    I may be a housing professional but my views, thoughts, opinions, advice, criticisms or otherwise on this board are mine and are not representative of my company, colleagues, managers. I am here as an independent human being who simply wants to learn new stuff, share ideas and interact with like minded people.


    • #3
      So long as one of the tenants can pass the required 'requirements' and credit checks then I would be relatively happy. I'd need to be convinced thet the 'creditworthy' one could afford the place under their own steam.


      • #4
        Thanks, hmmmm, it seems to me that it will be a lottery as to who the landlord is of the house we find that we want to take. This grates as we could spend a lot of time finding the perfect home, only to be turned down at the final I imagine being upfront is the best policy, but I fear this may put landlords off. Always more difficult since we have two young boys and I want to find the best home for them as possible.

        Maybe I should build a glowing reference file from landlords and my employer, to be handed over everytime I get interested in a property.



        • #5
          TBH, if I was given references at the point of viewing, they wouldn't mean much, as anyone can knock up a convincing "letter from employer" etc on a PC these days. Just be honest that your credit rating is not good, but your partners is - you should mention this up front as otherwise LL/LA may charge your for a credit check, only to confirm you are not a good risk, as you will not get the cost of the check refunded if you fail. I would rather know at the point of viewing where the land lies with you and your partner - it shows honestly from the outset. If you think your partner has enough income and good enough credit to pass the checks on their own, tell the agent/LL only to do one check and see how they feel about it.

          You could always sweeten the deal by offering a few months rent in advance if you can afford to, although that in itself has inherent risks. Would anyone be able to stand as a guarantor for you if the lack of good credit did cause a problem?


          • #6

            I am sure I can find a guarantor, not my retired parents any longer, but a friend or colleague I would expect. Are LLs as happy to accept a guarantor for security, as a tenant with good credit score?

            I have thought of offerieng 4 month rent in advance (using an advance from my employer). What are the risks, and are they to the LL or the Tenant?



            • #7
              Just make sure you do not find some agent who wants a "reservation fee" which he is not going to refund on the basis that you are a bad risk.


              Latest Activity


              • if we haven't signed the renewal are we still liable?
                Our 6 month short term assured tenancy agreement ended on the 2nd August. We are with a reputable agency. We were invited to renew for a further 6 months back in July and were asked to email our confirmation that we wish to renew in writing. This I did. We were sent the renewal tenancy to sign. We have...
                22-08-2017, 14:00 PM
              • Reply to if we haven't signed the renewal are we still liable?
                I would say your original AST continues as SPT.
                If now a new verbal AST, you may have a new fixed term and you cannot serve NTQ during fixed term (6 months?).
                Talk to LL directly, rather than LA.
                Why did you agree to a new AST, rather than request rolling over to SPT....
                23-08-2017, 00:30 AM
              • 6 year deposit claim
                Hi guys, I know that a tenant can claim a penalty on an unprotected deposit but I just wondered when the 6 year clock starts ticking.
                22-08-2017, 16:43 PM
              • Reply to 6 year deposit claim
                As memory fades over time, can someone provide a 'sticky' for dates when key elements of LL&T Legislation changed? I believe Apr 2012 predates later deposit timescales.
                23-08-2017, 00:08 AM
              • NTQ during fixed term?
                Can a LL issue a valid NTQ during the six-month fixed term of an AST agreement?
                (A residential let in England.)
                11-08-2017, 14:53 PM
              • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
                It's worth noting that guidance is under part 4 where tenant obviously is given notice to end of a period and therefore apportionment would not be applicable.

                The reference to the notice to quit ending the tenancy on the notice date does not change the fact that it obviously does however,...
                22-08-2017, 23:24 PM
              • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
                I think thats exactly what the section I have just quoted confirms.

                And thereafter, if you choose not to accept they are leaving as a result of the section 21 you must insist on a notice to quit or await a court ordering possession (where you will be ordered to apportion anyway)
                22-08-2017, 23:13 PM
              • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
                A lot of energy has been expended in this debate. It has been suggested a LL has no need to take Court action if T apparently vacates after receiving a s21 but with no Notice. LL cannot safely assume has vacated without Court confirmation, to avoid a T allegation of 'illegal eviction'. Equally I would...
                22-08-2017, 23:00 PM
              • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
                If someone could copy and paste section 21 (4) a and b (I'm really not technical!), the law seems to recognise that a tenancy CAN end as a result of a section 21 and before a possession hearing.

                21(4)b........the tenancy could be brought to an end by notice to quit given by the landlord...
                22-08-2017, 22:38 PM
              • Reply to 6 year deposit claim
                Assuming that the money originally paid had been used as a deposit for the single tenant tenancy, then 6 years and 30 days from when the 2012 tenancy started. And... if that was a fixed term tenancy, then 6 years and 30 days for any subseqent renwal and likewise from when it went periodic.
                22-08-2017, 22:22 PM