Missing Items

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Missing Items

    I'm looking for some advise please.
    We have had a tenant that has just left our property at two months after we gave her notice.
    Within the garden was a secure building we used to store some of our items. It wasen't available for the tenant.
    During an inspection, before she left, we noticed the store door had been forced and a dolls house had been moved into the living room.
    Now she has left it's missing altogether.
    In past experiance is it worth calling the police or just leaving.

  • #2
    Do you have proof it was there at the strt of the tenancy?
    Did the tenancy agreement specifically state that the building was excluded - eg:
    123 High Street; or
    123 High Street, excluding garden building

    If tenenant did not have the use of the building (although I suspect she legally did - another story) then it may have been broken into by persons unknown and the tenant wouldn't have noticed.


    • #3
      We don't have photo's of inside the storage from the start.
      We do have a photo from the inspection of the dolls house in the sitting room and the damage to the locked door of the building in the garden.
      In all honesty I don't think the building was mentioned in the agreement as it was done through an agency however we did verbally tell her when she moved in that it was not available to her and we were using it for storage.


      • #4
        For future reference, you demise the WHOLE property to the tenant unless it is specifically excluded. So whatever the land registry shows for "123 High Street" is what you let to the tenant if you let "123 High Street" to them.

        To be honest, I am not sure you can prove sufficiently to police or anyone else that the dolls house was in the building - and if you can't prove it was there, you can't prove it has gone.

        Have you asked the tenants about the door or the dolls house? It may just elicit an embarassed "ah yes, I meant to mention that...."


        • #5
          We have asked but she denies all knowledge even though we have a photo of the dolls house in the living room.
          There is also an great deal of damage to the house, way more than the bond can cover. We do have photo's of the house before she moved in. Could we take her to small claims court to recover the rest.


          • #6
            You can certainly sue for the damage.

            Do you have any way of proving that the photos relate to the time the tenancy commenced?

            Do you have a signed condition report / inventory form the start of the tenancy.

            Neither would affect your ability to sue. They could seriously impact your ability to win.


            Latest Activity


            • NTQ during fixed term?
              Can a LL issue a valid NTQ during the six-month fixed term of an AST agreement?
              (A residential let in England.)
              11-08-2017, 14:53 PM
            • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
              You made a claim. You tell us.

              It was claimed that a tenant may freely leave whenever he pleases once he has received a s.21notice. If that was indeed the case you can imagine the mess with all those precautionary notices.

              It was already the case...
              18-08-2017, 12:43 PM
            • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
              I totally agree, I was just trying to find any justification for claims that a tenant must serve notice in return of a section 21. It could never ever be demanded within the 2 month notice period, and in my opinion I agree it couldn't be demanded thereafter. But JJlandlord is adamant that requirement...
              18-08-2017, 12:40 PM
            • Lying tenant
              We had a tenant in our property. Initial agreement was for 6 months from April 2016 but then went on to SPT.
              In June he didn't pay his rent due on 15th of the month. Chased him and got excuses. On 10th July got a text from him saying he had moved out and left a key under the mat for us. He reckoned...
              18-08-2017, 12:03 PM
            • Reply to Lying tenant
              Hmm. If tenant was stupid enough to leave valuable furniture behind, it's JK0's money in my book.

              (Not that that ever happened. All I get left is broken Ikea tat.)
              18-08-2017, 12:30 PM
            • Reply to Lying tenant
              The deposit doesn't limit what you can try and recover from the tenant.
              It's simply a convention designed to make a simple claim easier.

              You can't sell the tenant's goods and use the proceeds to settle their debt without their consent.
              That's the tenant's money.
              18-08-2017, 12:27 PM
            • Reply to Lying tenant
              Unfortunately the deposit doesn't come close to what he already owes. Deposit of just over £1100 to cover two months rent at £900 per month, replacement carpet £200, bath replacement needed, disposal of rubbish, clearing of garden. He 'kindly' left us some furniture which I managed to sell for around...
              18-08-2017, 12:24 PM
            • Reply to Lying tenant
              And, of course, this....
              18-08-2017, 12:22 PM
            • Reply to Lying tenant
              There are rules about who is responsible for the council tax. And they relate to residence, not the tenancy.
              If the tenant is in the fixed term of a tenancy agreement, that means they're liable.
              If they are in a rolling agreement and move out, you are liable.

              If the tenancy...
              18-08-2017, 12:21 PM
            • Reply to Lying tenant
              I'd forget about getting utilites to believe you. Just work out a reasonable extra amount to add to deposit request.
              18-08-2017, 12:18 PM