Does A Deposit Need To Be Protected Within 14 Days By Law?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Does A Deposit Need To Be Protected Within 14 Days By Law?

    Does a tenant's deposit need to be protected within 14 days of it being received by the landlord? Or can it be protected at any time between when the deposit is received and before it is returned to the tenant?

    I have always been led to believe that it must be protected within 14 days. However, I am unsure as to whether this is a law or merely a recommendation by the TDS?

    #2
    Section 213(3) of the 2004 Housing Act states:

    Where a landlord receives a tenancy deposit in connection with a shorthold tenancy, the initial requirements of an authorised scheme must be complied with by the landlord in relation to the deposit within the period of 14 days beginning with the date on which it is received.

    Due to appeal court decisions, there is no effective sanction for late compliance.

    The forthcoming Localism Bill will extend that to 30 days, but if a landlord fails to comply he will have a choice...
    - Return he deposit; or
    - Not be able to serve a section 21.

    Comment


      #3
      Thank you for the reply. Now to complicate this a tad (sorry!).

      The tenant was only able to pay 50% of the deposit when they moved in (this was protected). The landlord then agreed to let them pay £x each month towards their deposit until it reached the figure agreed to in the AST. This did not materialise and the tenant then refused to pay any more towards their deposit each month. 4 months into the AST, can the landlord now pay the tenant's first rent payment into the deposit scheme (which would equal the deposit total as per the AST), however this would essentially make the tenant 1 month in arrears on rent?

      It looks like the DPS scheme has an option to select a date when the deposit is paid (and secured from), or will it still be possible to see the actual date of protecting the deposit?

      Comment


        #4
        No, if money was paid as rent, it IS rent. You can not 'create' arrears on the rent account.

        Other than s21 you have no real way of enforcing a deposit once the tenancy has begun.

        The tenant would get a confirmation from the scheme which would confirm when the deposit was protected.

        Comment


          #5
          How would a s21 enforce a deposit when the AST has not yet expired?

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by EViS View Post
            The tenant was only able to pay 50% of the deposit when they moved in (this was protected). The landlord then agreed to let them pay £x each month towards their deposit until it reached the figure agreed to in the AST.
            Really stupid idea, as this would mean that each installment would have to be separately protected and the prescribed information given again each time. Apart from the hassle, it has the potential to create huge complications if wanting to apply for possession under s.21.

            This did not materialise...
            What a surprise.

            4 months into the AST, can the landlord now pay the tenant's first rent payment into the deposit scheme (which would equal the deposit total as per the AST), however this would essentially make the tenant 1 month in arrears on rent?
            Nothing to stop LL protecting the money and trying to argue this, but if it ended up in court the court might ask to see evidence that the rent payment had been taken as a deposit, not as rent. If the contract specified that the deposit was payable in installments this would obviously not assist the LL's case.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by EViS View Post
              How would a s21 enforce a deposit when the AST has not yet expired?
              You can't 'enforce' a deposit, or make the tenant pay it after the tenancy has started.

              Always insist that the deposit is paid in full, in cleared funds, before the tenancy starts (and also, obviously, the first month's rent in advance). No exceptions.

              Comment


                #8
                Thank you for the replies. I appreciate I am myself in a pickle now, after 10 years of trouble-free renting, the first time ever I gave someone the benefit of the doubt, it has backfired on me!

                I am going down the section 8 route, I issued a Notice (as per templates on this forum) 2 weeks ago on grounds 8, 10 and 11. However, this is only valid if the court accept that one month's rent payment was put towards the deposit. I do not have any concrete proof of this and it is merely being done to 'speed up' the process of having to wait for 2 months (or 1 month and 1 day). I take it there is a considerable risk the court could throw the case out because of this?

                Originally posted by westminster View Post
                Really stupid idea, as this would mean that each installment would have to be separately protected and the prescribed information given again each time. Apart from the hassle, it has the potential to create huge complications if wanting to apply for possession under s.21.
                This is also relevant to applying for a section 8 as I currently am (as the AST is only a couple of months in), correct? Or am I misunderstanding something here?

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by westminster View Post
                  it has the potential to create huge complications if wanting to apply for possession under s.21.
                  Originally posted by EViS View Post
                  This is also relevant to applying for a section 8 as I currently am (as the AST is only a couple of months in), correct? Or am I misunderstanding something here?
                  I think Westminster is refering to the fact that there would be (say) 12 individual deposits that would need protecting to prevent the s21 being invalid. Deposit protection isn't notionally an issue for section 8 - though I have heard of a case where the 3x deposit claim has been used as a counterclaim for s8 - thus removing the rent arrrears. IIRC, this was a county court case, so is not binding on other judges.

                  Comment

                  Latest Activity

                  Collapse

                  • Attending Court - Advice Please
                    Muzza
                    Hi there

                    I posted recently about our tenant leaving and giving her ex the keys to our house, we have a court date of 4th January for which Im flying back to the UK to attend (no contact or rent received from the persons she has left in there still). I feel hes staying in there as long...
                    12-12-2017, 18:03 PM
                  • Reply to Attending Court - Advice Please
                    theartfullodger
                    Well done: Hope someone got LOTS of evidence (eg photos) of tenant's departure, all belongings gone. You had questionable legal right to change locks: Until bailiffs "execute" the possession order there is still a tenancy, it's still the tenant's home, the tenant's property. Hopefully enough...
                    22-01-2018, 19:44 PM
                  • Section 21 query
                    manchester89
                    Hi.

                    I was looking for some advice in regards to a Section 21 served.

                    A 6-month tenancy was originally granted in September 2015. Upon expiry a new 1-year fixed term tenancy was signed. Is this a new tenancy or a replacement?

                    In September the EPC and GSC was given...
                    22-01-2018, 12:51 PM
                  • Reply to Section 21 query
                    manchester89
                    I just wanted to make sure my landlord had done things right cause there are lots of things on the internet so its confusing but thank you i have as i don't want to be going through the eviction process with a small child id rather be out as soon as possible....
                    22-01-2018, 19:36 PM
                  • Invalid section 21 and limiting LL access
                    poppyla
                    Hi everyone,

                    I was wondering if you can help me with my issues with my LL. Apologies for the long post, but I’m going through a very stressful time.

                    My landlord tried to increase my rent “illegally” in Sept/Oct and wanted me to sign a backdated agreement and requested...
                    22-01-2018, 15:27 PM
                  • Reply to Invalid section 21 and limiting LL access
                    theartfullodger
                    All very well but realistically you can simply refuse access, change locks, say it's not convenient then. Yes they may have a contractual right but to enforce it they'd need a court order, which would take about as long as evicting you.

                    And which potential purchaser is going to await a...
                    22-01-2018, 18:36 PM
                  • Possession claim 'struck out' what can i do next
                    lislog
                    I filed a section 8 notice (correctly i believe) then a possession claim on line. The court hearing was 6th Dec - in stupidity or naivety having had no experience with the law before, i did not realise i had to attend the court hearing for a straightforward case of rental arrears (tenant owes £3000...
                    10-01-2018, 09:22 AM
                  • Reply to Possession claim 'struck out' what can i do next
                    Muzza
                    Id try and get it reinstated, if she didnt show the first time or make arrangments to pay its unlikely she will the second time, I recently had to fly back from the US to attend court on a section 8 and was in and out in 15 minutes - good luck to you.
                    22-01-2018, 18:22 PM
                  • Reply to Invalid section 21 and limiting LL access
                    poppyla
                    Yeah, i read all 33 pages of the thread... it is difficult though to understand exactly where i stand when it's so personal, rather than theoretical question!

                    They already pointed out which clauses say they can come in. There's one that says the landlord, his agent and any person authorised...
                    22-01-2018, 18:09 PM
                  • Reply to Attending Court - Advice Please
                    Muzza
                    UPDATE

                    Ok I flew home to attend court on 4th January, I was in and out in 15 minutes, possession was granted on rent arrears alone and anyone living in the house was given 14 days to leave, the tenant was also ordered to pay all arrears and court fee.

                    This meant they had to...
                    22-01-2018, 18:05 PM
                  Working...
                  X