Tenant Locked Herself Out

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tenant Locked Herself Out

    Hi all
    One of my tenants has lost her keys to the property.
    So I went round there to let her in with my keys only to find that she had changed the lock on the door at some point without my knowing. so my keys were no good.
    Can anyone tell me if it’s the tenants responsibly to cover the cost of a lock smith or do I have to stand the cost?
    Thanks Neil

  • #2
    Totally the tenants problem. Even if she hadn't changed the lock, it would have still been her problem.

    Comment


    • #3
      Just as an aside to this I used to have a clause within my terms with tenants (who were advised when they were in fact only applicants) that if they were to lose keys and called me out, dependent upon the time of day (or night) there was a scale of charges that had to be paid in cash before I would allow them re-entry using the office held key.

      This covered the cost of changing the lock(s) too, and on the odd occasion it occured you can bet they didn't lose them again. It usually happened after the tenants had been to a "function" and were unable to function normally as a result!
      The advice I give should not be construed as a definitive answer, and is without prejudice or liability. You are advised to consult a specialist solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Neil H View Post
        So I went round there to let her in with my keys only to find that she had changed the lock on the door at some point without my knowing. so my keys were no good.
        That'll teach her to change the lock without your knowledge, won't it?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Paul_f View Post
          Just as an aside to this I used to have a clause within my terms with tenants (who were advised when they were in fact only applicants) that if they were to lose keys and called me out, dependent upon the time of day (or night) there was a scale of charges that had to be paid in cash before I would allow them re-entry using the office held key.

          This covered the cost of changing the lock(s) too, and on the odd occasion it occured you can bet they didn't lose them again. It usually happened after the tenants had been to a "function" and were unable to function normally as a result!
          If you were to attend I think that, yes, I think you could charge for your time and work if it was made clear in advance.
          But I would be very careful when using the term "allow re-entry"...

          Comment


          • #6
            Agree with 'jjlandlord'.
            To allow re-entry could imply to the tenant that you would see it reasonable to deny re-entry. Just be cautious over that one. A clued up and malicious tenant would use that to their advantage.
            I may be a housing professional but my views, thoughts, opinions, advice, criticisms or otherwise on this board are mine and are not representative of my company, colleagues, managers. I am here as an independent human being who simply wants to learn new stuff, share ideas and interact with like minded people.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Paul_f View Post
              Just as an aside to this I used to have a clause within my terms with tenants (who were advised when they were in fact only applicants) that if they were to lose keys and called me out, dependent upon the time of day (or night) there was a scale of charges that had to be paid in cash before I would allow them re-entry using the office held key.

              This covered the cost of changing the lock(s) too, and on the odd occasion it occured you can bet they didn't lose them again. It usually happened after the tenants had been to a "function" and were unable to function normally as a result!
              "Used to have".

              Would you explain why it is no longer there, or what changed? (Career?)

              ML
              Refer Mad Regulators to Arkell vs Pressdram.

              Comment


              • #8
                Read my signature on most of my posts to see what I do now. Most of you already know!
                The advice I give should not be construed as a definitive answer, and is without prejudice or liability. You are advised to consult a specialist solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

                Comment

                Latest Activity

                Collapse

                • Abandonment
                  buttons
                  I have had a phone call from the tenants daughter, (didnt know she existed), telling me he is leaving in two weeks. I told her he has nearly 4 months left on his 12 month AST. I subsequently got two calls from a housing association. asking for a reference for him, I told them the situation but they...
                  20-09-2017, 19:56 PM
                • Reply to Abandonment
                  KTC
                  If the tenant holds a material interest of 6 months or more (i.e. during the 12 months AST), then the tenant is liable for council tax whether they are resident or not. During a SPT, the liability revert to the landlord when the tenant is no longer resident.
                  20-09-2017, 21:33 PM
                • Tenant having parking issues trying to hold me responsible
                  koksy
                  I own a freehold house which has had the front garden paved over to provide off road parking. There is a dropped kerb in front of the garden and double yellow lines all the way across the front of the house.

                  The local neighbours are choosing to ignore the double yellow lines and keep parking...
                  20-09-2017, 18:22 PM
                • Reply to Tenant having parking issues trying to hold me responsible
                  leaseholder64
                  The police really do not like dealing with this sort of thing, and you are unlikely to get a response, even though they could prosecute for obstructive parking. This is especially true given the double yellow lines, as they would prefer the council impose a civil penalty.

                  Although it will...
                  20-09-2017, 21:20 PM
                • Reply to Tenant having parking issues trying to hold me responsible
                  security2
                  If someone blocked the public footway outside the front gate to the property so your tenant couldn't walk into the property, would he call you to get this rectified? Or would he call the police/council?

                  No different if its a car on the public highway or any other blockage on the public...
                  20-09-2017, 21:20 PM
                • Reply to Abandonment
                  Wannadonnadoodah
                  May only be tenants who have housing benefit paid then.
                  20-09-2017, 21:17 PM
                • Reply to Abandonment
                  buttons
                  This I believe is incorrect, I do have experience of that part happening before and sent the council a copy of the AST and they cancelled my charge....
                  20-09-2017, 21:14 PM
                • Reply to Abandonment
                  Wannadonnadoodah
                  In the eyes of the council as soon as he starts paying CT at his new property the liability will fall to you regardless of what else is happening.
                  20-09-2017, 21:02 PM
                • Reply to Abandonment
                  buttons
                  I thought you could have it so that property was marketed but he still had liability as he wont be able to pay anything as he is unemployed and would reduce his liability to council tax if let before the end of his tenancy.
                  20-09-2017, 20:48 PM
                • Reply to Abandonment
                  KTC
                  Either you recover the property, or the tenant is still the tenant with liability for rent & council tax (during fixed term of 6 months or more). You can't have it both ways of getting the property back but not liable for council tax.
                  20-09-2017, 20:38 PM
                Working...
                X