Landlords Letting Out To Tenants in Breach Of Lease In Joint Freehold

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Landlords Letting Out To Tenants in Breach Of Lease In Joint Freehold

    Hello, I am a Joint Freeholder of a block of 4 maisonettes and have lived here for 16 years. 2 of the 3 other flats in the block are now rented out to tenants, one is currently up for sale and being looked at by people interested in buying it to let out like, the other 2. I still live in my flat as the only original owner.

    My problem is that the other owners who are renting their flats out are continuously doing so to tenants who are (possibly unknowingly) in breach of many covenants in the Lease from minor annoyances, to having large, noisy, aggressive guard dogs patrolling around their gardens barking their heads off at people coming and going through the communal areas etc and making my life a misery. The Lease says "The Lessee shall not keep on the premises or any part thereof any dog cat or other animal or bird or pet without the written consent of the Lessor which may be revoked by notice in writing" All 4 of us are the Lessor as far as I understand it. There has also never been involved or set up any management company so the communal areas are now falling into quite a bad state of repair making them for all the reasons I've mentioned unatractive to buyers coming to view. The dogs that I believe the tennants are keeping in breach of lease are barking their heads off at potential buyers when they come through the communal hall area. Any advice on what I can do would be really appreciated.

  • #2
    No management co, no mention of service charge for up keep of building eg roof. Who pays if roof leaks?
    A quick search of Land Registry title deeds (£4) should reveal if who is/are the freeholders. Though OP bought his maisonette methinks it was poss Leasehold. Even if flat owners are the freeholders, then OP would be pnly 1 vote in 4, with at least 2 making money from renting out. It is also poss the restrictive covenant on domestic pets may be unenforceable. If a T requests to keep a pet, when the AST says 'no pets', then my current understanding is that such request 'cannot be unreasonably witheld' Covenants usually relate to structure of building or erection/demolition of structures, eg walls or fences in an open plan development.
    I suggest OP needs specialist local legal advice and should perhaps consider selling up.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by mariner View Post
      No management co, no mention of service charge for up keep of building eg roof. Who pays if roof leaks?
      A quick search of Land Registry title deeds (£4) should reveal if who is/are the freeholders.
      Mariner - read the post he tells you all that right away and it undermines your otherwise sensible comment.
      Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

      Comment


      • #4
        The four of you are the freeholder and therefore are responsible for the upkeep of the building. If an individual leaseolders tnennt is in brech then teh four freeholders msut decide on waht action to take. I suggest that as the lone persn on site yu need to otline the concerns and action needed.

        If the others fail to agree on taking any action or you cannot get a majority, then as a leaseholder your lease may require the freeholders ( all 4 of you) to enforce the terms of the lease. If so then the county court can order the freeholder to take particular steps, if yo apply as leaseholder.

        If there is a continued apathy then as there is breach you could apply to the LVT to appoint an independent manager- the threat of that alone might ring them to heel.
        Based on the information posted, I offer my thoughts.Any action you then take is your liability. While commending individual effort, there is no substitute for a thorough review of documents and facts by paid for professional advisers.

        Comment

        Latest Activity

        Collapse

        • what is current requirements for smoke alarm?
          daxu
          Hi,
          I have a one bed flat that is let out at the moment. I asked an electrician to change the fusebox to a consumer unit and asked him for a cost of changing my battery smoke alarm to a main conntected one.

          What he told me is that I need two alarms, one smoke alarm and one heat alarm...
          21-07-2017, 10:02 AM
        • Reply to what is current requirements for smoke alarm?
          MrShed
          What a load of rubbish this sparky is spinning to you!!

          A single battery operated smoke alarm on a single floor is absolutely fine.
          21-07-2017, 10:23 AM
        • Claiming for protected deposit
          mandm
          This is an interesting one, got me into a spin.
          Tenants signed AST but decided to leave after 6 months and 3 days (problem with moving) using the break clause in the AST. I protected the deposit using DPS (Insured) and returned the deposit minus deductions when the moved out.
          I served the...
          21-07-2017, 08:00 AM
        • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
          MrShed
          To be fair, allowing DPS to send the email is even worse, as this doesnt help you prove that they received it.

          In fairness it doesnt sound like you did in fact give them the prescribed information...
          21-07-2017, 10:18 AM
        • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
          mandm
          Thanks Guys for your immediate response, i will write and will attach the confirmation email from the DPS to the solicitor.
          @AndrewDod I did not send them email, DPS did, i also asked them to post the confirmation to tenants but they said due to DPA, tenants needs to request that!
          Is there...
          21-07-2017, 10:03 AM
        • Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
          MrShed
          I've just posted something on GDPR and then wondered whether it had been discussed on here before - a quick search implies its never been mentioned.

          I thought I would raise a topic to discuss it and the implications on landlords.In effect this is a replacement of the Data Protection Act...
          20-07-2017, 15:01 PM
        • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
          MrShed
          Depends on the storage provider. The other problem is though that in a disaster recovery position, they usually fail this to somewhere else, out of EU - which puts you in breach
          21-07-2017, 09:50 AM
        • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
          jjlandlord
          Cloud storage providers let you choose where to store data for this very reason.

          It is OK to send data to the US under the so-called "Privacy Shield" as far as I know.
          21-07-2017, 09:46 AM
        • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
          mariner
          If you are confident you did provide required PI in full, then let T take you to Court; if not, settle. A Judge can only award T the Deposit (if not returned) + 1-3x deposit for the Penalty.

          You cannot require T to sign anything, only ask.
          21-07-2017, 09:43 AM
        • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
          jpkeates
          If you store data in the cloud, you almost certainly breach the DPA - the data is (almost certainly) outside the EU and held somewhere without equivalent measures in place (the EU has said that safe haven isn't sufficient).

          In fact, you haven't got a clue where it's stored.
          21-07-2017, 09:10 AM
        Working...
        X