unsuccessful tenancy deposit sceme case. advice needed.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    unsuccessful tenancy deposit sceme case. advice needed.

    Hi. My previous landlord had failed to deposit my bond under any sceme. After advice from a law centre and the courts i proceded with a part 8 claim for the £600 deposit and x3 penalty plus costs of £175. On the day of the hearing the judge said this case is not a part 8 and is a part 7. Had i done a part 7 claim i would of won the case. The landlord said he would write a cheque for 600 today. The judge accepted that and only awarded me £95 costs on top and said if i don't cash the cheque i will lose everything.. So i have lost out on money because of what i was told. Does anybody know what i should do next or any advice really. Part 7 is an option if the cheque bounces but i doubt it. Should i cash it in or fight on

    #2
    Originally posted by kevin2011 View Post
    On the day of the hearing the judge said this case is not a part 8 and is a part 7.
    The judge was wrong. Under Part 56 of the Civil Procedure Rules, deposit non-compliance claims under s.214 Housing Act 2004 must use Part 8 procedure. See
    http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/c...rts/part56.htm (and the Practice Direction)

    Does anybody know what i should do next or any advice really. Part 7 is an option if the cheque bounces but i doubt it. Should i cash it in or fight on
    Cash it.

    Following the judgment in Gladehurst v Hashemi earlier this year (see http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2011/604.html - esp para. 37) the tenant has no claim against LL under s.214 after the tenancy has ended.

    Comment


      #3
      The judge awarded part 7 costs as the claim was a part 8 which cost me costs£175. Should i of been awarded the costs i paid. If it was moved to part 7 on the day i would of been awarded x3. So Im confused why 75 was awarded.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by westminster View Post
        The judge was wrong. Under Part 56 of the Civil Procedure Rules, deposit non-compliance claims under s.214 Housing Act 2004 must use Part 8 procedure. See
        http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/c...rts/part56.htm (and the Practice Direction)

        Your quote says...


        (3) Where the claim is an unopposed claim –


        (a) the claimant must use the Part 8 procedure, but the following rules do not apply –


        (i) rule 8.5; and


        (ii) rule 8.6; and


        (b) Omitted


        (c) the court will give directions about the future management of the claim following receipt of the acknowledgment of service.


        (4) Where the claim is an opposed claim the claimant must use the Part 7 procedure.

        (Practice Direction 56 contains provisions about evidence, including expert evidence in opposed claims)


        This is opposed surely?!
        [I]The opinions I give are simply my opinions and interpretations of what I have learnt, in numerous years as a property professional, I would not rely upon them without consulting with a paid advisor and providing them with all the relevant facts[I]

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by kevin2011 View Post
          The judge awarded part 7 costs as the claim was a part 8 which cost me costs£175. Should i of been awarded the costs i paid. If it was moved to part 7 on the day i would of been awarded x3. So Im confused why 75 was awarded.
          As I said, the judge was wrong about Part 7/Part 8, unless of course the judge struck out the 3x part of the claim because of the judgment in Gladehurst v Hashemi - is this what happened? If so, this could explain why you were only awarded Part 7 costs.

          If the hearing was after the judgment in Gladehurst v Hashemi on 19th May, and also after tenancy ended, then a 3x claim would have failed regardless of whether you'd used Part 7 or Part 8 procedure.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by MrJohnnyB View Post
            Your quote says...


            (3) Where the claim is an unopposed claim –


            (a) the claimant must use the Part 8 procedure, but the following rules do not apply –


            (i) rule 8.5; and


            (ii) rule 8.6; and


            (b) Omitted


            (c) the court will give directions about the future management of the claim following receipt of the acknowledgment of service.


            (4) Where the claim is an opposed claim the claimant must use the Part 7 procedure.

            (Practice Direction 56 contains provisions about evidence, including expert evidence in opposed claims)


            This is opposed surely?!
            You are quoting from the section entitled: Claims for a new tenancy under section 24 and for the termination under section 29(2) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 - which obviously has no relevance to a s.214 HA2004 claim.

            The relevant bits are:

            Part 56

            56.1

            (1) In this Section of this Part ‘landlord and tenant claim’ means a claim under
            (f) section 214 of the Housing Act 2004


            and

            Practice Direction 56

            2.1
            Subject to paragraph 2.1A, the claimant in a landlord and tenant claim must use the Part 8 procedure as modified by Part 56 and this practice direction.




            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by westminster View Post


              You are quoting from the section entitled: Claims for a new tenancy under section 24 and for the termination under section 29(2) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 - which obviously has no relevance to a s.214 HA2004 claim.

              The relevant bits are:

              Part 56

              56.1

              (1) In this Section of this Part ‘landlord and tenant claim’ means a claim under
              (f) section 214 of the Housing Act 2004


              and

              Practice Direction 56

              2.1
              Subject to paragraph 2.1A, the claimant in a landlord and tenant claim must use the Part 8 procedure as modified by Part 56 and this practice direction.




              Ahh thanks for clarifaction. My skim reading abilities clearly arent up to much!
              [I]The opinions I give are simply my opinions and interpretations of what I have learnt, in numerous years as a property professional, I would not rely upon them without consulting with a paid advisor and providing them with all the relevant facts[I]

              Comment


                #8
                He pleaded guilty and said sorry but still contested the claim. Thought it was a simple case. The judge said you can't have the x3 on a part 8 as it is a claim for money which claim for moneys are part 7. I am a tenant until my deposit is repaid hence he would not have to pay my deposit back as i don't live there anymore. Case was last Wednesday.

                Comment


                  #9
                  ok here is the letter from the court i received today, i was not happy about being giveen a cheque and did not settle. i was told take the cheque or lose everything.

                  p.s it says on the footnote about being ordered that it be a part 7??? im so confused, after all this do i fight on or still cash the cheque.
                  Attached Files

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by kevin2011 View Post
                    ok here is the letter from the court i received today, i was not happy about being giveen a cheque and did not settle. i was told take the cheque or lose everything.

                    p.s it says on the footnote about being ordered that it be a part 7??? im so confused, after all this do i fight on or still cash the cheque.
                    I can only repeat what I said in post #2.

                    Originally posted by westminster View Post
                    Cash it.

                    Following the judgment in Gladehurst v Hashemi earlier this year (see http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2011/604.html - esp para. 37) the tenant has no claim against LL under s.214 after the tenancy has ended.
                    You have zero chance of winning if you try to pursue a claim for the 3x penalty because the above judgment is binding on lower courts - worst case scenario, you could end up being ordered to pay the LL's costs.

                    Comment

                    Latest Activity

                    Collapse

                    • Reply to Rent Rises in 2020
                      by DPT57
                      Well if the market rent for your properties has increased and you think that there would be a good prospect of re-letting quickly and there is a low risk that your existing tenant will stop paying rent altogether then from a business point of view, it makes sense to increase the rent. Having said that,...
                      22-09-2020, 14:57 PM
                    • Rent Rises in 2020
                      by jpucng62
                      I cancelled all my annual rent increases when Covid hit. Since then some people have really suffered financially and others haven’t. In addition LHA rates have increased substantially for anyone needing support which appears to have had the knock on effect of increasing the rent of properties now...
                      19-09-2020, 17:48 PM
                    • Reply to Rent Rises in 2020
                      by jpucng62
                      Where I rent properties (Beds / Northants / Nottingham) rents have risen substantially and availability has fallen. So my question is still, 6 months on from everyone being told to stay at home and with normality of work returning for many tenants (I accept not all) and many people not unduly financially...
                      22-09-2020, 14:44 PM
                    • Reply to Tenants possessions left in abandoned property
                      by MR M
                      I did consider approaching a Tracing Agent to try to obtain the Tenant's current whereabouts or updated information about them but the feeling is that it is not worth initiating this yet as its too soon. They may not show-up as having set-up elsewhere yet or have generated updated information about...
                      22-09-2020, 14:10 PM
                    • Tenants possessions left in abandoned property
                      by MR M
                      The tenancy is a statutory periodic tenancy after the original AST ended. The tenant has rent arrears and a S21 was issued around 3 months ago. There is no deposit and an EPC, gas safety certificate and how to rent guide were all issued previously to the tenant.

                      I believe that the tenant...
                      16-09-2020, 10:03 AM
                    • Reply to Renovation/Improvements vs Repairs / Maintenance
                      by newtenant9011
                      You can prevent the landlord from entering, as you have a right to quiet enjoyment, you can even replace the locks if you would like.

                      In turn, the landlord could issue you a section 21 notice, but the notice period is 6 months currently plus the court backlog.
                      22-09-2020, 14:08 PM
                    • Renovation/Improvements vs Repairs / Maintenance
                      by thesleepingdog
                      Hello,

                      I am having A LOT of trouble with my LL who is continually asking to carry out improvements on the property. It is literally nonstop and it has got to the stage where I am utterly fed up and want to leave.

                      During my tenancy he has replaced all the windows in the house,...
                      22-09-2020, 13:22 PM
                    • Reply to Rent Rises in 2020
                      by DPT57
                      In my part of London there is no market justification for rent increases and imo increased individual landlord costs is not a reason to raise them....
                      22-09-2020, 14:07 PM
                    • Reply to Rats
                      by ChrisDennison
                      These are very interesting comments, one of my councils (South West) told me they had to stop these services unless in public areas.
                      22-09-2020, 12:35 PM
                    • Rats
                      by ETB
                      I have a tenant who has reported that he can here rats in the walls and ceiling of his 4th floor apartment. He says there are other complaints on the tenants facebook group. I have messaged the maintenance company (Name removed) but they are not replying. Just wanted to check who is liable, I'm assuming...
                      21-09-2020, 22:15 PM
                    Working...
                    X