dss tenant yes or no?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dss tenant yes or no?

    I have found a tenant which i would like to take on,only problem is they are dss and the lender doesnt allow this.Can i get around this somehow,or would it be better to avoid it?

  • #2
    Take them on as non-dss tenants - once they were in they applied for DSS didn't they?

    Comment


    • #3
      But what about the insurance,wouldnt that become void?,and if the lender found out what could they do?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by davidjohnbutton
        Take them on as non-dss tenants - once they were in they applied for DSS didn't they?
        What difference does it make whether they became DSS after they moved in? Surely to avoid the insurance becoming void, they would have to be evicted, harsh as that sounds.

        The best solution would be to talk to the insurers, and if they can't help (likely; although maybe they do a more expensive policy that permits DSS?) then if the OP definitely wants these tenants, he'll have to cancel the current policy and take out a new one.

        IMHO it's not worth mucking about with this; if the tenants manage to burn the place down, you can bet your life that the insurance co will investigate at length and do anything they can to avoid paying out, and a sniff of something slightly untoward (like DJB's strategy above) is all they need!
        Last edited by Ericthelobster; 15-05-2005, 16:01 PM. Reason: typo

        Comment


        • #5
          but even if i had a valid insurance for dss,wouldnt it cause a problem that the lender doesnt allow it?

          Comment


          • #6
            Have you checked with the lender about the DSS problem? The only requirement my lenders have is that the rent is at least 130% of the mortgage. It seems very strange because what would happen if the tenant really was initially working and then lost their job, what about someone about to retire? Would you be expected to throw them out? Bear in mind that your contract is with the tenant, they are responsible for the whole rent. Also, the DSS do not help towards housing, this is for the local authority and is Housing Benefit which is either paid to the tenant or direct to you on the tenant's behalf, either way, the tenant is responsible for the rent whether they receive enough money from work or HB.

            Comment


            • #7
              The lender stipulates no dss,but i think the tenant is claiming housing benefit is this the same as dss?. I havent actually bought the property yet,but have already made the mortgage application and have said that it wont be occupied by dss,but this tenant would be good as i know them.

              Comment


              • #8
                As far as I am aware, HB is not DSS, not sure what a DSS tenant is . I note that you are buying a place with a sitting tenant , have you made absolutely sure that it is an AST, stipluate to your solicitor that only an AST between you and the tenant is acceptable. Doesn't matter how well you know the tenant, I got started in the letting business because a 'friend' who was renting a place from me prior to buying it, walked out and left me almost broke, I had to let it out as I couldn't afford to wait while it sold. Never looked back though.

                Comment


                • #9
                  If your lender states that you must not let the property to persons on housing benefit then stick to it! I'm surprised David Button has suggested you try and circumvent this by what can only be described as deception; insurers are not known for their generosity towards such people. It will be a breach of your mortgage too, and will possibly void some aspects of your home insurance should you choose this route.

                  Yes! DSS (Dept. of Social Security - a government dept.) and HB (Housing Benefit - a local authority dept.) claimants are one of the same for this purpose. It means they won't/don't/can't work and have insufficient means of support otherwise. It just means that they also might claim other benefits from the DSS for which they are entitled except those concerning housing, and these are dealt with by the housing dept. of the local authority.
                  The advice I give should not be construed as a definitive answer, and is without prejudice or liability. You are advised to consult a specialist solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I think you should read that clause more carefully because there is no 'Department of Social Security' anymore. If there is a clause excluding all claiments of what was the DSS it seems an extremely broad exclusion, it would for example exclude a fully employed person claiming disability benefit, that I would suspect could fall foul of the 'Disability Discrimination Act'

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Yes Energise I take your point. I was just indicating the common interpretation of what everyone seems to understand as it's meaning. I realise the dept. has since been absorbed.

                      A fully employed person claiming disability benefit would not be entitled to housing benefit in the same way as the unemployed, and it would not be a breach of the DDA or the mortgage if the mortgagor restricted the tenancy that imposes a condition on the landlord not to allow persons who are not in gainful full-time employment at the outset.
                      The advice I give should not be construed as a definitive answer, and is without prejudice or liability. You are advised to consult a specialist solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Hi Paul f I wasnt trying to be pedantic (sorry if it appeared that way) but was questioning the validity of the clause in this instance. If the clause specifically says "DSS" then the proposed tenant would not be excluded as he is not claiming "DSS".

                        Comment

                        Latest Activity

                        Collapse

                        • Claiming for protected deposit
                          mandm
                          This is an interesting one, got me into a spin.
                          Tenants signed AST but decided to leave after 6 months and 3 days (problem with moving) using the break clause in the AST. I protected the deposit using DPS (Insured) and returned the deposit minus deductions when the moved out.
                          I served the...
                          21-07-2017, 08:00 AM
                        • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
                          mariner
                          It was the situation predicted by some Judges et al when it was first proposed that the full Penalty would be awarded to the T and not the Exchequer.
                          22-07-2017, 01:16 AM
                        • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
                          JK0
                          I agree. It's almost at the level of scandal as the people claiming cash by pretending they were ill on holiday. In that case, the Spanish Hotels have told tour operators they won't be doing all inclusive holidays any more.

                          Therefore, I suggest landlords take a page out of their book, and...
                          21-07-2017, 22:22 PM
                        • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
                          mandm
                          Letter sent with the evidence attached.
                          Slightly off topic, it seems there this deposit protection appears to have gathered conflicting views.
                          I would have thought that the purpose of the legislation was the protection of T's money, which most law-abiding landlords do but it seems that its...
                          21-07-2017, 21:20 PM
                        • Landlord threatening to sue after end of tenancy
                          Pickle135
                          Our tenancy has just ended. We have cleaned the property from top to bottom using professional cleaners to do this and clean the carpets. He suggested this hadn't been done and wanted the name of our contractor to check which we gave him. The contractor assured him that after eight years the carpets...
                          08-03-2017, 00:45 AM
                        • Reply to Landlord threatening to sue after end of tenancy
                          Pickle135
                          Woohoo!

                          Our adjudication has just come through and the landlord has been given a token payment with the majority of our large deposit being returned to us. He was told that he had not submitted appropriate evidence for the misuse of the property and that things he was saying were wrong...
                          21-07-2017, 20:49 PM
                        • Deposit at the end of AST. Also, quiet enjoyment.
                          scooter08
                          Q1 – Where is the rented property located (England / Wales / Scotland / N Ireland)?
                          England

                          Q2 – What type of Tenancy Agreement (TA) is this e.g. sole tenant / multiple tenant / room only?
                          AST

                          Q3 – What date did current TA start dd/mm/yy?
                          12/04/2015
                          ...
                          21-07-2017, 15:06 PM
                        • Reply to Deposit at the end of AST. Also, quiet enjoyment.
                          scooter08
                          Thanks for the reply jp....
                          21-07-2017, 18:32 PM
                        • Reply to Deposit at the end of AST. Also, quiet enjoyment.
                          jpkeates
                          Makes sense - if the tenancy agreement doesn't say you have to let him and a surveyor in, his only right of access is with 24 hours written notice for the purpose of viewing the "condition and state of repair" of the property.

                          So you can simply decline or make your point.
                          ...
                          21-07-2017, 18:23 PM
                        • Reply to Deposit at the end of AST. Also, quiet enjoyment.
                          scooter08
                          I'm not trying to claim for breach of quiet enjoyment. He wants to be in again with a surveyor to use his property as security for something. I am going to let him I just want to remind him and have all the facts. Sorry if I didn't explain it right.

                          Only claiming for the non protection...
                          21-07-2017, 18:08 PM
                        Working...
                        X