Guarantor for only 1/3 of the rent?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by jeffrey View Post
    But OP was trying to see if G could guarantee "G's" tenant's one-third only. I'd say not.
    Agreed. I should have been clearer.

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by mind the gap View Post
      So when your daughter signed up for her shared student house, you did not have to act as Guarantor?
      Surprisingly enough, no; it was never mentioned although I was fully expecting it to be an issue!

      I do not see why an individual G cannot be liable for a defined amount/proportion of the joint debt even if the T legally is not.
      No, and I'd agree; but isn't the point whether it's 'legally' possible to achieve that aim; which is what I was getting at by my point (b) above?

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by Grrr View Post
        I see what you're saying lawcruncher, but doesn't that then suggest "all tenants are jointly and severally liable, apart from tenant X who only has to pay up to his share and no more" ?

        On the other hand I guess that just releases the Guarantor from any further responsibility, but not tenant x (even though x probably hasn't got any money!) ?
        No, because the relationship between the tenants amongst themselves and with the landlord is governed by the tenancy agreement. You say in the guarantee, to put it beyond doubt, that the arrangement with the guarantor is without prejudice to the right of the landlord to proceed against any tenant on the basis that the tenants are jointly and severally liable.

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by Lawcruncher View Post
          No, because the relationship between the tenants amongst themselves and with the landlord is governed by the tenancy agreement. You say in the guarantee, to put it beyond doubt, that the arrangement with the guarantor is without prejudice to the right of the landlord to proceed against any tenant on the basis that the tenants are jointly and severally liable.
          Exactly. The best words in the best order!

          That's what I was trying to explain (and failing!)

          Parents (including me) of student tenants are understandably unwilling to guarantee the debts of the 3, 4, 5, 6 or more strangers with whom their offspring propose to live. Market forces and the bone-headedness of some letting agents will determine matters in some cities, but it is a perfectly reasonable objection and I predict that increasingly, LLs will have to accommodate it. LC has explained how it can be done - parent Guarantors, insist on it!
          'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations

          Comment


            #20
            Originally posted by Ericthelobster View Post
            It does strike me as odd that somehow this guarantor issue hasn't or can't be satisfactorily resolved... if I were asking a tenant to provide a guarantor I wouldn't expect or want said guarantor to cover all the co-tenants; and as the parent of a university student currently sharing a rented house with 7 others who I don't know from Adam, I would be extremely reluctant to serve as guarantor for her!
            I do hope your daughter is No 5, 6, 7 or 8th named on the TA as she can walk-away at the end of the tenancy knowing that L cannot touch her legally.
            The advice I give should not be construed as a definitive answer, and is without prejudice or liability. You are advised to consult a specialist solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by Paul_f View Post
              I do hope your daughter is No 5, 6, 7 or 8th named on the TA as she can walk-away at the end of the tenancy knowing that L cannot touch her legally.
              The discussions which have taken place here on that issue (which is separate from this thread's issue of Guarantors' liablity) seem to have concluded that that is not in fact the case.
              'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations

              Comment


                #22
                So some say; but I await news of any High Court case definitively holding that one or other view is the law.
                JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by jeffrey View Post
                  So some say; but I await news of any High Court case definitively holding that one or other view is the law.
                  You mean you are not persuaded by my arguments?

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by Lawcruncher View Post
                    You mean you are not persuaded by my arguments?
                    Paul_f seems not to be!
                    JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                    1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                    2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                    3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                    4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by jeffrey View Post
                      Paul_f seems not to be!
                      That wasn't the question - and in any case Paul_f is a former letting agent, not a lawyer.
                      'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by mind the gap View Post
                        That wasn't the question - and in any case Paul_f is a former letting agent, not a lawyer.
                        True; and you're a teacher. So?
                        JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                        1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                        2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                        3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                        4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by jeffrey View Post
                          True; and you're a teacher. So?
                          So I defer to Lawcruncher's analysis (as expounded previously), as he is legally qualified and I trust him to know what he is talking about.
                          'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations

                          Comment

                          Latest Activity

                          Collapse

                          • Reply to S21 served expired EPC!
                            by jpkeates
                            but the legislation doesn't say that.

                            Sections 38 and 39 of the Deregulation Act 2015 allow the government to prescribe certain requirements that, if they are not met can make a section 21 notice invalid.
                            They must be enacted and relate to:
                            (a) the condition of dwelling-houses...
                            24-09-2021, 15:43 PM
                          • S21 served expired EPC!
                            by Worriednow
                            Hi All
                            Hope you can help. I served a S21 notice on my tenants giving them 6 months notice to leave. The actual tenancy expired in August 2021 but with the Covid rules i had to give 6 months notice which means they have to be out by November.

                            The notice was served May this year but...
                            23-09-2021, 20:02 PM
                          • Reply to Boundary fence
                            by nukecad
                            Note that just because your deeds say that you are responsible for maintaining the fence that doesn't make it your fence, just your responsibility.

                            His deeds may also have a similar clause saying that he is responsible for maintaining the fence, so is also assuming that it's his fence....
                            24-09-2021, 15:38 PM
                          • Boundary fence
                            by Ollyn
                            Hello,

                            On my Deeds, it shows which fence is my responsibility, and I have always maintained it.

                            My new neighbour acquired the property next door, and later, without my knowledge or prior agreement, removed the fence completely, and replaced it with a lower one.

                            ...
                            23-09-2021, 09:06 AM
                          • Holes in walls
                            by Pocahontas
                            Hello

                            What is the general consensus for letting tenant put holes in the walls for things such as pictures, paintings etc?

                            Is it a straight no? Or do you allow some leeway?...
                            24-09-2021, 15:32 PM
                          • Reply to S21 served expired EPC!
                            by jpkeates
                            No you don't.
                            I suspect that one day a court will interpret the law so that you will have to (which is one reason to avoid replacement tenancies), but the wording of the legislation is helpful.

                            The section 21 restrictions simply say that the landlord has to have complied with regulation...
                            24-09-2021, 15:15 PM
                          • Reply to If I issue a section 8 and its not contested, will I definitely get the warrant?
                            by darkdev
                            Yes it does seem ridiculous I know, I guess theres a slight further complication in that:

                            - I have rent insurance, so perhaps whilst evicting I will still get rent, whilst I also try to make the necessary repairs.
                            - I'm also considering how I would access the deposit that was left,...
                            24-09-2021, 15:03 PM
                          • If I issue a section 8 and its not contested, will I definitely get the warrant?
                            by darkdev
                            I have a tenant on a long lease (12 months to run), I need to evict them with a section 8 which will be focused on the fact they were running a cannabis farm. Tenants seem to have run off, haven't heard from them in 3 weeks. If as you might expect they don't contest the eviction, will I definitely...
                            22-09-2021, 12:42 PM
                          • Reply to S21 served expired EPC!
                            by Worriednow
                            Fair enough, I think I was very clear, I served a S21 on the tenants in May with an EPC that had already expired unbeknown to me at the time. Although this was served by the agent apparently as a landlord I can't claim ignorance.

                            Legislation states that a landlord cannot serve a valid section...
                            24-09-2021, 14:45 PM
                          • Reply to S21 served expired EPC!
                            by KTC
                            With greatest of respect to the lawyer you spoke to, [citation needed].


                            I don't think anyone here would dispute that a valid EPC needed to have been given to the tenant BEFORE the service of the s21. But if the statement is that a valid s21 need to be in place at the time of service...
                            24-09-2021, 14:39 PM
                          Working...
                          X