Items left as a goodwill gesture - why?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Items left as a goodwill gesture - why?

    We have recently acquired a studio flat which will be let out in a couple of months. We intend to let this furnished, as it was a repo and came with things like bed, TV, cooker, fridge, washing machine, etc.

    We've noticed that many landlords advertise their flats with the notice that "items have been left as a goodwill gesture, and will not be repaired/replaced if broken".

    Why is this? Is it to stop the tennant from breaking an item so that they get a new one? Surely a cooker needs to be repaired/replaced by the landlord if it breaks?

    We're thinking of adding in the contract that only the cooker, fridge and washing machine will be repaired/replaced, and that the breakage should be reported to ourselves so that we can take remedial action rather than the tennant "dumping" the item.

    Does this sound reasonable/legal?

    Thanks.

    #2
    I've personally never seen this term used in an advert, but I presume its because the LL does not want the responsibility of repair or replacement when the item becomes faulty. In some cases, it could be items left by a previous tenant, which LL does not want the cost of removal/disposal, so have left for the incoming tenant to use. However, it is a legal requirement for you to PAT test all electrical items in the property every year, to ensure they are safe, so get this done before you let.

    If you are intending to let furnished, you would be responsible for replacing/repairing all items you provide, unless you specifically state otherwise, or the tenant has damaged through misuse. A tenant should never dispose of any item supplied and included on the inventory, as this is the landlord's property. Faulty items beyond repair should only be disposed of with your agreement.

    Incidentally, we also let a studio flat, but have always let it unfurnished, as this relieves us of the requirement to ensure the safety of any appliances and furniture in the property, and subsequent repairs or replacement. We have never had problems letting this way, in fact some tenants have preferred it as they already have their own furniture etc.

    Comment


      #3
      Thanks for the reply, good advice much appreciated.

      Comment


        #4
        I believe that if nothing else is specifically agreed, tenant is responsible for repairs and landlord is responsible for replacements.

        Comment


          #5
          It is good practice to PAT test items that use electricity, but it is not a legally enforceable requirement whereas it is with gas.

          Comment


            #6
            LL has no statutory obligation to repair TVs or kitchen appliances such as a cooker, fridge or washing machine - the responsibility is whatever is contractually agreed. Thus, LLs advertising that such items are left as a 'goodwill gesture' is by way of explaining that LL is not contractually responsible for their upkeep and putting a somewhat rose-tinted slant on it.

            Comment

            Latest Activity

            Collapse

            • Reply to Deducting Cleaning Costs from Deposit
              by Lawcruncher
              Just to clarify, what I meant was that the requirement comes from the tenancy terms if they include it....
              29-01-2022, 08:38 AM
            • Deducting Cleaning Costs from Deposit
              by Piffy
              I use a Letting Agent. Recently the tenants vacated, prior to the tenants leaving when the letting agent did an inspection they advised the tenants that the property would need cleaning before they vacated. The tenants have now left, the place does need a good clean, the Letting Agents have said that...
              27-01-2022, 11:30 AM
            • Reply to Inherited a few rentals
              by Flashback1966
              or just work hard and hopefully take an early retirement.

              You can't predict the future. Things always go in cycle. They want to get rid of Section 21, so you may be unable to get your property back. You may end up working and subsidising your rentals....
              29-01-2022, 03:42 AM
            • Reply to Renting rooms
              by DoricPixie
              It wasn't so much tat as a ground for eviction for PRT is wanting to move into the property (for now). It was more that I'd put my heart and soul into making the property nice and it wasn't being cared for as well as I would have liked. I didn't like being at the mercy of a letting agent either particularly...
              28-01-2022, 18:03 PM
            • Renting rooms
              by Luke
              I have a three bedroom property in the U.K which I will rent out .
              I have had an enquiry from a couple and a friend
              I do not intend to live at the property
              Would it be possible just to rent two rooms to them , on the understanding they have full access to the property ?
              As its...
              28-01-2022, 06:09 AM
            • Reply to Renting rooms
              by DoricPixie
              I've had unoccupied insurance whilst I was overseas before. It was challenging finding an insurer as a non-UK resident but I did find one and the premium wasn't horrific. I did have to have someone go and check on the property every week as a condition of the insurance and luckily I had someone to...
              28-01-2022, 17:59 PM
            • Reply to Renting rooms
              by theartfullodger
              Just be careful with insurance. Empty properties are a "challenge"
              28-01-2022, 17:57 PM
            • Reply to Renting rooms
              by Hudson01
              If i were in this position then i would do the same, there is far too much risk thesedays if you wish to move back into it, either accept the risk and rent is as it really is with an AST or leave it empty....
              28-01-2022, 16:38 PM
            • Reply to Deducting Cleaning Costs from Deposit
              by jpkeates
              That document is out of date and, in a lot of places, possibly as a consequence, now wrong or misleading.

              The concept of individually negotiated clauses is now deprecated in consumer law.
              The OFT no longer exists and it's successor, the CMA, has withdrawn its advice about unfair terms...
              28-01-2022, 16:18 PM
            Working...
            X