Non-paying tenant: how soon can I evict?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Non-paying tenant: how soon can I evict?

    Well, had to happen - after 5 years of excellent tenants, none of whom I have had any problems with - I've finally got one who's behind with the rent and looks as if they'll continue.

    I posted recently about this at the bottom of a (related) thread but think it may have been missed: could I trouble the great and good here for some input?!! Basically, it's still fairly early days and I just want to be sure I'm following the right strategy and that there's nothing I'm missing... see bottom of the following thread:

    http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums...ead.php?t=3501

    Many thanks!
    Last edited by Ericthelobster; 22-09-2006, 08:28 AM. Reason: duplicated post

  • #2
    Why wait until December? I'd go for the Section 8, Grounds 8, 10 and 11. That way, if she pays off enough to hold off mandatory eviction under Ground 8, you can at least get suspended possession on the other two Grounds. At least that way she has to continue to pay the rent and reduce the arrears, even if it's only by a few quid each week. If she defaults, it's back to court for possession.

    You've also still got the Section 21 to fall back on should the above not work how you want it to.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by RichieP View Post
      Why wait until December? I'd go for the Section 8, Grounds 8, 10 and 11. That way, if she pays off enough to hold off mandatory eviction under Ground 8, you can at least get suspended possession on the other two Grounds. At least that way she has to continue to pay the rent and reduce the arrears, even if it's only by a few quid each week. If she defaults, it's back to court for possession.
      So how does this work? I'd assumed I could do a Section 8 grounds 8 as soon as she's 8 weeks in arrears (that would be on 1 November, right? Or 1 October? I'm not clear; she first missed her monthly payment (ie for the month of September) on 1 September, so presumably that make her 4 weeks in arrears on 1 October, not 1 September, right?) However, I further thought she could stave off for another month simply by paying me a quid or so; that being the case, I thought S21 a month later was my best bet... I'm evidently wrong though?

      Thanks!

      Comment


      • #4
        No. On 1st September she should pay you for all of September. 1 month arrears.

        On 1st October she needs to pay for October. She misses that she's 2 months in arrears. Bingo. Section 8 time.

        She can pay you a quid to get under the mandatory Ground 8, but all using 10 and 11 means you can still get suspended possession.

        Comment


        • #5
          Non-paying tenant

          Yes I agree with RichieP; you don't work in the "payment in advance" idea as apparently suggested by Eric. Contract calls for payment on 1st September and 1st October. If tenant defaults on both these, she is 2 months in arrears on the 2nd of October.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by johnjw View Post
            Yes I agree with RichieP; you don't work in the "payment in advance" idea as apparently suggested by Eric. Contract calls for payment on 1st September and 1st October. If tenant defaults on both these, she is 2 months in arrears on the 2nd of October.
            Just to clarify, the last payment that you received on 1st August covered which period - up to 1st August or from then on?

            Assuming she paid in arrears rather than in advance, your date for the S8 would be as RichieP and johnjw suggest, though I would go for 2nd Oct rather than 1st, just to be absolutely sure, for the S8. And do ALSO issue the S21 to finish after 31st December as well. You could even issue it at the same time as the S8, you don't HAVE to wait until the end of October, in case you mistakenly miss the 2 month period, as is very easy to do. One reason landlords don't issue them early is the fear that the tenant won't pay once they receive it, but she's already not paying!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Surrey View Post
              Just to clarify, the last payment that you received on 1st August covered which period - up to 1st August or from then on?

              Assuming she paid in arrears rather than in advance, your date for the S8 would be as RichieP and johnjw suggest, though I would go for 2nd Oct rather than 1st, just to be absolutely sure, for the S8. And do ALSO issue the S21 to finish after 31st December as well. You could even issue it at the same time as the S8, you don't HAVE to wait until the end of October, in case you mistakenly miss the 2 month period, as is very easy to do. One reason landlords don't issue them early is the fear that the tenant won't pay once they receive it, but she's already not paying!
              Payments are usually "in advance" ie. payment on the first of October is for the monthly period to first of November. I imagine this is the case for Erics tenant.
              However I would still argue that the tenant, having failed to pay on the 1st of September and having failed to pay again on the first of October, is two months in arrears on the 2nd of October. Under the terms of the contract, Eric should be holding those two monthly rents on the second of October. The tenant is clearly two months in arrears on that date.
              I think we have had this debate before but it was a considerable time ago.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by RichieP View Post
                Why wait until December? I'd go for the Section 8, Grounds 8, 10 and 11. That way, if she pays off enough to hold off mandatory eviction under Ground 8, you can at least get suspended possession on the other two Grounds.
                I'm grateful for the advice: indeed I'll be doing just this next week, once she's two months in arrears.

                Meanwhile, after having been reasonably communicative over the problem, my tenant has gone quiet following a visit last week to the local Housing Association, to see what they had to offer her. If she'd gone to what used to be the Council housing dept about this, I'm sure she'd have been advised to sit tight in my property until the bailiffs come a-knocking and she is forced out. Is that likely to be what has happened at the Housing Association? I don't know a lot about these outfits - do they have the same obligations to provide housing as the Council did?

                Unfortunately I know my tenant will be pretty low priority, being single, under 25, with no dependents; she's now unemployed and unable to afford the rent.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Non-paying tenant: how soon can I evict

                  I wouldn't expect too much from the Housing Association application. They will probably write to you for a reference and will not be too keen on a young unemployed lady with rent arrears. The H.A's are steered to businesses which are supposed to break even.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by johnjw View Post
                    I wouldn't expect too much from the Housing Association application. They will probably write to you for a reference and will not be too keen on a young unemployed lady with rent arrears. The H.A's are steered to businesses which are supposed to break even.
                    Yes, rather what I'd thought - I'm certainly not holding my breath. But do they have a legal obligation to rehouse my tenant?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Non-paying tenant: how soon can I evict

                      Originally posted by Ericthelobster View Post
                      Yes, rather what I'd thought - I'm certainly not holding my breath. But do they have a legal obligation to rehouse my tenant?
                      No. The people they take on have to show that they will meet their obligations to the Housing Association. I had non-paying tenants a couple of years ago who applied to HA's. They were turned down and eventually, after eviction, were rehoused by the Local Authority.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by johnjw View Post
                        No. The people they take on have to show that they will meet their obligations to the Housing Association. I had non-paying tenants a couple of years ago who applied to HA's. They were turned down and eventually, after eviction, were rehoused by the Local Authority.
                        Although I agree with most of what you've posted, a point I would make through working in Local Authority is that most of the housing stock is now managed by Housing Associations through stock transfer.Eric's tenant would not be eligiable for help if she makes herself intentionally homeless by rent arrears as Eric specifys.Now Eric's best route is to serve a S21 NOTICE as well as a S8 Notice. For the tenant to even get a whiff of a HA property she would have to make an application to homelessness department but would only be accepted on the grounds that she did not make herself "intentionally homeless" which is not what the scenario is.Even if it got to the eviction stage the most she would get would be a place in a hostel due to her personal circumstances.
                        Disclaimer:I have over 30 years experience in housing(both social and private) as an EHO and Building Surveyor.I am also a certified expert witness having spent the last 15years working in housing litigation.The advice I give is from experience in working for various Local Authorities and how the law is interpretated.Housing Law is a minefield and is continually being amended if in any doubt you should consult a solicitor or someone of equal legal standing.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by pms View Post
                          a point I would make through working in Local Authority is that most of the housing stock is now managed by Housing Associations through stock transfer. Eric's tenant would not be eligiable for help if she makes herself intentionally homeless by rent arrears as Eric specifys.
                          Yes that's the situation here: as I understand it the HA now deal with all aspects of housing? But would my tenant by classed as 'intentionally homeless'? While I am very unhappy at losing my rent, I do have some sympathy for the girl - she lost her job and simply doesn't have the income to pay the rent. Or do you mean she'd be "intentionally homeless" if she moves out now (to minimise her accruing debt) rather than waiting until the bailiffs physically carry her out?
                          Originally posted by pms View Post
                          Now Eric's best route is to serve a S21 NOTICE as well as a S8 Notice.
                          Sure: I did the proverbial 'Sword of Damocles' S21 at the outset of the tenancy, which ends on 31 December.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I would have thought anyone being evicted for rent arrears is classed as "intentionally homeless" regardless of the reason.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by RichieP View Post
                              I would have thought anyone being evicted for rent arrears is classed as "intentionally homeless" regardless of the reason.
                              That is correct.If a person makes themself "intentionally homeless" the LA/HA are under no obligation to rehouse them.Rent arrears is defined as being"intentionally homeless" No if Eric wanted to sell or re-develop his property then it would be the opposite" unintentionally homeless" then the LA/HA would have a duty to re-house.Its in the HA(1996) amended by the Homelessness Act(2002).I look up the Acts tomorrow and post the revelent sections.
                              Disclaimer:I have over 30 years experience in housing(both social and private) as an EHO and Building Surveyor.I am also a certified expert witness having spent the last 15years working in housing litigation.The advice I give is from experience in working for various Local Authorities and how the law is interpretated.Housing Law is a minefield and is continually being amended if in any doubt you should consult a solicitor or someone of equal legal standing.

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              • Claiming for Non protected deposit
                                charliesugar
                                This is posted on behalf of my cleaner who approached me for help after her last landlord failed to reply to her repeated requests for return of her deposit.
                                She rented a room in a shared house in London, AST, weekly rent all paid on time. Notice given and accepted, room left neat and clean....
                                27-06-2017, 13:18 PM
                              • Reply to Claiming for Non protected deposit
                                mariner
                                [QUOTE=charliesugar;n998575]To DIY she would need to pay a £305 court fee up front ( or I would have to lend it to her!) then there is the hassle of a court date etc NWNF at least gives her the support of someone who knows what they are doing[QUOTE]

                                Really?

                                AFAIK
                                win...
                                21-07-2017, 01:01 AM
                              • Help. Scam/ fraud letting
                                Hayleydenice93
                                Hiya

                                i need some advise on my situation in regards to this flat offered to me and my partner. We viewed a flat which was in an old office block which had been converted into service apartments and then refurbished into flats.

                                The agency we viewed the flats through did not want...
                                20-07-2017, 20:59 PM
                              • Reply to Help. Scam/ fraud letting
                                mariner
                                So who owns the Freehold?
                                IMO there cannot be a freehold TENANCY.
                                21-07-2017, 00:24 AM
                              • Agent refusing to give reference until we hand in notice
                                Jenny7
                                Hi, hope you can offer some insight, we are looking to move rental property due to new job starting in September in a new location.
                                So thankfully we've a window to shop around to find a new place.
                                We've found one suitable spot but we're still looking around, the new place has asked for credit...
                                17-07-2017, 12:10 PM
                              • Reply to Agent refusing to give reference until we hand in notice
                                MrShed
                                Couldn't agree more. How shortsighted. Unless they assume a tenant would leave with no notice and no forwarding address...
                                20-07-2017, 22:47 PM
                              • Reply to Agent refusing to give reference until we hand in notice
                                KTC
                                Going back to the OP.

                                This makes zero sense. Why would the LA/LL want a notice to quit from a tenant who they don't otherwise have a problem with. The longer until the tenant provide the notice, the longer the tenant is liable for rent. The notice period given now say, or given a month...
                                20-07-2017, 22:46 PM
                              • Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                                MrShed
                                I've just posted something on GDPR and then wondered whether it had been discussed on here before - a quick search implies its never been mentioned.

                                I thought I would raise a topic to discuss it and the implications on landlords.In effect this is a replacement of the Data Protection Act...
                                20-07-2017, 15:01 PM
                              • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                                MrShed
                                I'm not sure that calling someone's career driven information "nonsense" could be classed as anything other than an insult....
                                20-07-2017, 22:41 PM
                              • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                                JK0
                                Not intended to be an insult. Just sad that some are so frightened of TPTB....
                                20-07-2017, 22:39 PM
                              Working...
                              X