Damage to washing machine

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Damage to washing machine

    I have a tenant in a furnished flat...this includes a washing machine (brand new and installed after the start of the tenancy).
    One day the owner of the property below my flat said that water was coming from her ceiling. My tenant (in the flat above) said that the washing machine was not working - no water in the machine. But there was a lot of water under the machine and in the flat below.
    I called an engineer to repair the machine. The cause was a small hole in the outer plastic drum of the machine. The engineer said that from years of experience he was 100% certain that a coin had fallen out of a pocket in the laundry, entered the seal between the inner drum and the door, and fallen between the inner and outer drums. Once the machine was on its spin cycle, the coin damaged the outer drum, creating the hole from which water escaped.

    Because the washing machine was used with a coin in the laundry (and thus was not used in accordance with the instructions), the insurance policy would not pay out.

    Can I hold the tenant liable for the costs of repairing the machine, as well as repairs to my neighbour's flat? Can I use the deposit money to pay for these repairs?

    Many thanks.

  • #2
    In theory you probably could, if you can get in writing from the engineer as to this being the cause. Did you supply the tenant with the instruction manual for the washing machine when he moved into the property?
    Any posts by myself are my opinion ONLY. They should never be taken as correct or factual without confirmation from a legal professional. All information is given without prejudice or liability.


    • #3
      The instruction booklet was left with the tenant when the machine was installed.

      By the way, is there a landlord's insurance policy that would cover such "accidental damage" to any of the furnishings and appliances in the flat?


      • #4
        Originally posted by henryw View Post
        Because the washing machine was used with a coin in the laundry (and thus was not used in accordance with the instructions), the insurance policy would not pay out.
        Surely - and correct me if I'm wrong - your insurance hasn't paid out because you don't have an 'accidental damage' policy? If not, I can't see why this wouldn't be classed as an 'accident': or is there a suggestion that the tenant deliberately tried to sabotage the machine by smuggling a coin into his washing?


        Latest Activity


        • Referencing question
          A couple wants to rent from me, she is on maternity leave and will not be returning to her previous employment, he is permanently employed and moving due to a job transfer. I have referenced him for the full rent and his guarantor has been successfully referenced.
          I am going to prepare the ast...
          22-07-2017, 17:19 PM
        • Claiming for protected deposit
          This is an interesting one, got me into a spin.
          Tenants signed AST but decided to leave after 6 months and 3 days (problem with moving) using the break clause in the AST. I protected the deposit using DPS (Insured) and returned the deposit minus deductions when the moved out.
          I served the...
          21-07-2017, 08:00 AM
        • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
          I'll leave it at that. I'm not going to get into one of JPK's interminable arguments.
          22-07-2017, 16:28 PM
        • Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
          I've just posted something on GDPR and then wondered whether it had been discussed on here before - a quick search implies its never been mentioned.

          I thought I would raise a topic to discuss it and the implications on landlords.In effect this is a replacement of the Data Protection Act...
          20-07-2017, 15:01 PM
        • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
          That's simply one of the Schedule 2 exemptions which, if met, allows a process using personal data at all - all the other principles still apply in parallel (where it can be stored, be not excessive, kept up to date etc).

          So, while it might be OK because it relates to a contract, there...
          22-07-2017, 15:22 PM
        • Excessive estate agent fees
          I have a property which I started renting out via an agency. When the contract started, they found new tenants, did the relevant checks etc and charged an upfront fee which equates to approx one month's rent. As one year has almost passed, the agent has approached me asking if I want them to 'renegotiate'...
          21-07-2017, 16:26 PM
        • Reply to Excessive estate agent fees
          A new 12 month fixed term does provide LL & T with extra security but can lead to complications for either if their resp circumstances/legislation change during the new AST.
          Personally, I would prefer if a orig AST was for a fixed 6 month term, followed by an SPT that required both LL &...
          22-07-2017, 14:09 PM
        • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
          In this case there should be no problem because:...
          22-07-2017, 12:30 PM
        • Reply to Excessive estate agent fees
          I'm not sure they're "lying", they're just making some assumptions.

          The agent can't decide if something is "too" risky or not - there are upsides and downsides to having a new fixed term agreement, and they're right to point out, for example, that the income would be...
          22-07-2017, 12:28 PM
        • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
          Unless the tenant has given consent for the data to be used in this way, probably.

          There's a grey area with this kind of data, because it's obviously been obtained for a purpose (which is to facilitate the renting of a property) and that's what it's being used for.
          There's usually...
          22-07-2017, 12:23 PM