verbal contract? can LL back out?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • verbal contract? can LL back out?

    We recently advertised our property for rent in the Cambridge area. Some people expressed interest and we got them to fill out an application form. We ran credit checks and all seemed ok, we informed the prospects they could move in but they said they only had the deposit in cash not first months rent. After some confusion tenants came to property one evening and gave deposit in cash (we gave receipt) but did not move in and nothing was signed. They promised to get first months rent in cash the next day and we arranged to meet that evening, sign the AST and move the tenants in. However, on the same evening as the first pair gave the deposit, two more prospects viewed and immediately agreed to take the property. These later people seem to be much better, with professional, steady jobs, more business-like attitude etc (first pair of prospects were slow and initially reluctant to fill out application form also somewhat cavalier with fittings in the flat during viewings).

    My question is, can we change our minds at this eleventh hour? We have not signed anything but we have a months deposit in cash and we did arrange a date, the following day!, for them to move in. If we withdraw could the tenants sue us claiming a verbal or parol contract has been established?
    Last edited by john26; 17-09-2006, 18:30 PM.

  • #2
    Yes you can pull out as long as you haven't given them possession of the property (ie keys).

    Give them all their money back.

    It's not a great way to do business and you need to ask yourself if you were prepared to give this first group the property why you don't want to now. They displayed (apparently!) an attitude which I wouldn't tolerate in a prospective tenant and any reluctance of any kind, especially with form filling is a great big no no.

    You may never see the second group again.

    I never like to take people who want to move in the next day, it smacks of desperation, usually because they are being evicted elswhere and it doesn't give you enough time to do all of your checks.

    Proceed with caution.

    Comment


    • #3
      It certainly looks as though you have made some kind of contract and they could sue, bit it is unlikely they will as the precise nature of the contract has not been written down and it would simply be their word against yours. If you withdraw you are a naughty boy/girl.
      Disclaimer: What I say is either right or wrong. It may be advisable to check what I say with a solicitor. If he says I am right then I am right, unless he is wrong in which case I am wrong; but if he says I am wrong then I am wrong, unless he is wrong in which case I am right

      Comment

      Latest Activity

      Collapse

      • Mouldy silicone wear and tear?
        aciduzzo
        Tenants are moving out today and i am doing the final inspection later; however, last time i was at the flat i noticed the bathroom was in a poor state.

        What is the general opinion on black mould that has formed inside bathroom silicone? Is it considered wear and tear? Also, the seal...
        03-07-2017, 08:07 AM
      • Reply to Mouldy silicone wear and tear?
        mystic08
        You might like to gift your new tenants some Kilrock mould cleaner which is magic in a bottle! Cheapest in the Pound shop or The Range but supermarkets sell it too. Works brilliantly on algae too. Garden pots, patios, headstones etc.
        22-07-2017, 20:52 PM
      • Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
        MrShed
        I've just posted something on GDPR and then wondered whether it had been discussed on here before - a quick search implies its never been mentioned.

        I thought I would raise a topic to discuss it and the implications on landlords.In effect this is a replacement of the Data Protection Act...
        20-07-2017, 15:01 PM
      • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
        jjlandlord
        That's the exemption that allows sending data outside of the EEA, which is the issue discussed.



        No, because of that very exemption....
        22-07-2017, 19:19 PM
      • Referencing question
        kangoo1
        A couple wants to rent from me, she is on maternity leave and will not be returning to her previous employment, he is permanently employed and moving due to a job transfer. I have referenced him for the full rent and his guarantor has been successfully referenced.
        I am going to prepare the ast...
        22-07-2017, 17:19 PM
      • Claiming for protected deposit
        mandm
        This is an interesting one, got me into a spin.
        Tenants signed AST but decided to leave after 6 months and 3 days (problem with moving) using the break clause in the AST. I protected the deposit using DPS (Insured) and returned the deposit minus deductions when the moved out.
        I served the...
        21-07-2017, 08:00 AM
      • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
        JK0
        I'll leave it at that. I'm not going to get into one of JPK's interminable arguments.
        22-07-2017, 16:28 PM
      • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
        jpkeates
        That's simply one of the Schedule 2 exemptions which, if met, allows a process using personal data at all - all the other principles still apply in parallel (where it can be stored, be not excessive, kept up to date etc).

        So, while it might be OK because it relates to a contract, there...
        22-07-2017, 15:22 PM
      • Excessive estate agent fees
        Cml241
        I have a property which I started renting out via an agency. When the contract started, they found new tenants, did the relevant checks etc and charged an upfront fee which equates to approx one month's rent. As one year has almost passed, the agent has approached me asking if I want them to 'renegotiate'...
        21-07-2017, 16:26 PM
      • Reply to Excessive estate agent fees
        mariner
        A new 12 month fixed term does provide LL & T with extra security but can lead to complications for either if their resp circumstances/legislation change during the new AST.
        Personally, I would prefer if a orig AST was for a fixed 6 month term, followed by an SPT that required both LL &...
        22-07-2017, 14:09 PM
      Working...
      X