Quarterly property inspections?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Quarterly property inspections?

    Hi,

    Bit of background, have been renting for a few years whilst saving to buy a place, this has always been through one estate agents.

    Last property, I had zero issues, never missed a payment, landlord sold up after 2 years of me being there to cash in any equity she had, when she came to visit, said she was really pleased how nice I'd kept it, how bad some tenants can be etc etc, how easy I'd made it for her to sell. The new owners wanted to deal directly with me to make themselves a few extra bob, in addition, they wanted me to tell their solicitor I was moving out as they hadn't been able to get a mortgage entitling me to stay !! Didn't fancy being put in a position where I could be booted out, relying on a verbal agreement with people I didnt know, but equally I was really happy to move anyway, it wasn't the greatest of places, noisy neighbours doing housework at 2am drove me insane, and am really happy in a much nicer place now, albeit more expensive. Sometimes you just need an insentive, as no-one wants the aggravation of moving

    Anyway, have been in the new place 3 months, again haven't missed any rent or bills, place is still immaculate, just me living here. Agent came round yesterday to have a look, said it was spotless, landlord would be chuffed, and I was one of her best tenants. However, when pressed on when they'd be coming back, she said every 3 months.

    Seems a bit excessive to me, seeing as there are no issues at all, it feels as though its encroaching a bit on my right to quiet enjoyment of the property as if its my own

    Any thoughts? do I just have to sit back and take it? or can I request they visit every 6 or 12 months depending on successfull visits each time that highlight no problems?

    Thanks.....

  • #2
    I don't have a fixed schedule of formal inspections.

    Is there mention in your tenancy agreement that quarterly inspections would be carried out and if so did you make any comment before signing the agreement?

    Regardless of any conditions in the AST the landlord is entitled to carry out inspection provided you are given due notice. Did the agent give you written notice in advance of the date and time of the proposed inspection? If this was not done there was no right of entry and this would be regarded as intrusion. Did the agent carry out a full inventory check and condition check on this 'inspection'

    If it was just a brief visit maybe you should regard it as an opportunity for you to let the agent and landlord know any problems that you are experiencing.

    You will see from threads posted on this forum it only takes a short while for a satisfactory tenancy to suddenly deteriorate through circumstances beyond the control of the tenant (e.g serious illness, loss of job and depression etc).

    If the tenancy was only for a six month period the landlord would be checking the situation in the third month to see whether or not the tenancy should be renewed or a section 21 notice should be served. A similar inspection would take place in the ninth month of your yearly tenancy.

    I don't consider these additional visits, if properly arranged, in a twelve monthly tenancy to be unreasonable but others may disagree!!!
    Vic - wicked landlord
    Any advice or suggestions given in my posts are intended for guidance only and not a substitute for completing full searches on this forum, having regard to the advice of others, or seeking appropriate professional opinion.
    Without Plain English Codes of Practice and easy to complete Prescribed Forms the current law is too complex and is thus neither fair to good tenants nor good landlords.

    Comment


    • #3
      Personally if the rent is paid promptly, the property looks o.k from the outside and there are no complaints from neighbours i do not myself make inspections ( apart from sending corgi etc engineers yearly if applicable) i can think of one property with same tenant that i have not been in for over 12 years.I see no point in disturbing good tenants.

      If there are problems i would try to deal with them straight away, not wait for a specific time frame on inspections.
      Opinions given are mine, They are not necessarily correct, as the more I learn the less I know, You should always seek professional help.

      Comment


      • #4
        Seeing as you are a landlord Vic, your response doesn't surprise me, no doubt you'd have weekly visits if you could, but its more about respecting the privacy and rights of the tenant. Right now, I couldn't give a toss if I;m asked to move out at the end, despite the place being perfect for me, still in immaculate condition, and me paying the asking price (a shade under 900 quid for a flat), so satisfactory for boths sides IMO

        There was no need to air anything with the Agent, as there are no problems, I could call if I had any issues. Funnily enough, thats exactly how she sold it to me, being for my benefit, despite me confirming the intention was the exact opposite during the visit, which was perfectly friendly and amicable BTW

        This isn't in my interests, its in the landlords, and its all about piece of mind for them and to hell with the tenant

        Yes, the visit was, and future ones will be, planned over the phone or email, but thats not really the point. It isnt the period of notice that annoys me, its the frequency of privacy invasion

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by nick.. View Post
          Seeing as you are a landlord Vic, your response doesn't surprise me, no doubt you'd have weekly visits if you could, but its more about respecting the privacy and rights of the tenant. Right now, I couldn't give a toss if I;m asked to move out at the end, despite the place being perfect for me, still in immaculate condition, and me paying the asking price (a shade under 900 quid for a flat), so satisfactory for boths sides IMO

          There was no need to air anything with the Agent, as there are no problems, I could call if I had any issues. Funnily enough, thats exactly how she sold it to me, being for my benefit, despite me confirming the intention was the exact opposite during the visit, which was perfectly friendly and amicable BTW

          This isn't in my interests, its in the landlords, and its all about piece of mind for them and to hell with the tenant

          Yes, the visit was, and future ones will be, planned over the phone or email, but thats not really the point. It isnt the period of notice that annoys me, its the frequency of privacy invasion
          No need to be slightly abusive towards a forum member who's answered your question fair and square !

          As was said a quaterly visit is standard with most agents/landlords. And before you tell me I'm biaised or something, I'm no landlord and I've been a tenant who had quaterly visits in a property that was well looked after.
          Again as was said, feel free to refuse the visits but be prepared to be evicted at the end of the fixed term and forget about references.

          Comment


          • #6
            nick.. I sympathise, these visits are a pain but they are fairly routine. Since I started renting this time I've been in two properties with two different agents and both have done quarterly inspections. These just consist of the agent having a quick chat and a brief look round. As you say it isn't really for me to report issues as I report them when they come up and if they are urgent I'd expect them to have been fixed before the next inspection anyway.

            At the next visit, once they have seen the good condition, you could try asking for less frequent inspections, they may have to ask to landlord to agree, but it could well be they refuse.

            My take is it's a pain I put up with. I suppose it does give you some good background towards getting your deposit back and good references. If it's a small agency it allows you to build up some rapport with the agent which could be useful if any issues arise in the future. My last agent took my side against my landlord on two occasions.
            ~~~~~

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Jennifer_M View Post
              No need to be slightly abusive towards a forum member who's answered your question fair and square !

              As was said a quaterly visit is standard with most agents/landlords. And before you tell me I'm biaised or something, I'm no landlord and I've been a tenant who had quaterly visits in a property that was well looked after.
              Again as was said, feel free to refuse the visits but be prepared to be evicted at the end of the fixed term and forget about references.
              Abusive? come on, don't be so sensitive. Maybe I should've put a winking smiley face in, but seeing as these visits are 100% to placate the landlord, I would expect no other response.

              In reality, it is unnecessary (if no problems are reported), and is another thing to make the tenant feel like a second class citizen. I pay over a thousand pounds in rent and bills to live there, and look after it like it is my own, it's hard enough to make rental accomodation feel like your 'home', even without the finger or suspicion being pointed at you every 3 months

              Its wrong to have things slanted towards the landlord, in a market saturated with fortunate amateur entrepreneur by-to-letters, you'd think Agents would see they also need to see it from the tenants side of things, and treat them as customers

              Too many people see it as a money making venture, forgetting there is a person on the other end who is just as entitled to a place to call home as they are

              If you dont like our terms, tough, find somewhere else to live

              Nick

              -edit- surely the comment about references is wrong? mine are provided by my Estate Agent, and the worst they could say is "refused quarterly inspections, allowed annual/bi-annual, never missed a payment, nothing missing/damaged when left"

              I'll take that, thanks

              Comment


              • #8
                Legally, the landlord cannot force you to permit access for inspections. But, I must say that I think your attitude is fairly poor. Why be SO against a landlord checking out his 6 figure investment? To ensure it is still in good nick? A tenant is only as good as his current tenancy, prior history does not neccessarily mean you will look after this place. Not saying you won't, but you need to bear in mind landlords have a massive amount of money invested into your home, it really is not too much of an inconvenience to you to allow them in every few months. Don't get me wrong, I understand your view, but you are completely negating the view of the landlord.

                And no I am not a landlord
                Any posts by myself are my opinion ONLY. They should never be taken as correct or factual without confirmation from a legal professional. All information is given without prejudice or liability.

                Comment


                • #9
                  He has five weeks of my rent up front to cover any damage, and is able to view the property once or twice a year to check for things like damp that are out of my control and would have serious consequences.

                  There is no inconveniece with meeting them for inspections generally, it is a matter of principle. Buying a property to let it out is fraught with potential pitfalls, guarding against them should not infringe on the tenants right to live in peace and quiet. If its apparent you have someone who is legit and not likely to piss over the carpets and set fire to curtains, I think you should extend the same respect back

                  Twice a year is plenty, but I guess I'll have to sit back and be dictated to, I'm only living there after all

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I actually agree with the OP - to a degree ...

                    If it is a new tenancy I can certainly understand the LL wanting to keep an eye on his investment in the first few months but as a tenant I would expect the frequency of inspections to reduce the longer the tenancy existed, especially f the rent was being paid on time and the first 1 or 2 inspections gave no cause for concern.

                    Yes, LL's are investing a lot of money of the property but letting it out to tenants, knowing all the inherent risks is, presumably, a choice they have made purely for financial reasons and some LL - and Agents - need to acknowledge that whilst it is the their property it is also the tenants HOME and as such be afforded a degree of privacy as the law dictates.

                    I doubt very much if any property owner would be too pleased if their mortgage lender visited every 3 months to make sure their investment was being looked after ... same difference !!

                    I think it calls for a certain amount of discretion and reasonableness on the part of both sides.

                    Perhaps, Nick, after the next one is carried out, you should say to them that as they've found no problems with these inspections they could be reduced to say once or twice a year. My LL does his inspection when he comes round once a year with the Corgi guy. Although a new tenant, with only a 6 month tenancy, has just had a 3 month inspection carried out by the agent presumably to ascertain whether both parties want to continue after the expiry of the fixed term, although it's written into his lease that 3 monthly inspections will be the norm.
                    Any information or opinion given in this post is based only on my personal experience, what I have learned from this, other boards and elsewhere. It is not to be relied on. Definitive advice is only available from a Solicitor or other appropriately qualified person. E&OE

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Worldlife View Post
                      <snip>Is there mention in your tenancy agreement that quarterly inspections would be carried out and if so did you make any comment before signing the agreement?

                      Regardless of any conditions in the AST the landlord is entitled to carry out inspection provided you are given due notice. Did the agent give you written notice in advance of the date and time of the proposed inspection? If this was not done there was no right of entry and this would be regarded as intrusion. Did the agent carry out a full inventory check and condition check on this 'inspection' ?<snip>
                      It would be helpful if the original poster would answer the above questions to determine the degree of intrusion that took place or might take place in the future.

                      If the terms of the AST and statutory requirements for entry were not complied with then that could be mentioned in a request to the landlord/agent to change the frequency of inspections.
                      Vic - wicked landlord
                      Any advice or suggestions given in my posts are intended for guidance only and not a substitute for completing full searches on this forum, having regard to the advice of others, or seeking appropriate professional opinion.
                      Without Plain English Codes of Practice and easy to complete Prescribed Forms the current law is too complex and is thus neither fair to good tenants nor good landlords.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Hi,

                        Thanks everyone for the input.

                        As I stated previously, the visit was arranged long in advance, and all future ones will be, thats really not an issue, the EA's are very professional and are very easy to deal with. Posting the question here is really a matter of getting it off my chest and finding out whether it is reasonable, without souring the relationship with the EA and the landlord, which remains excellent.

                        The AST makes no mention of frequency of visits, only the usual legal aspects of allowing access after 24 hours written notice, in reality a call a week in advance is what it will come down to, and I'm fine with that. They were also happy to delay for a week due to my work availability

                        I think Pippay explained my feelings better than I can word them, and I think I should mention to the EA next time she visits that as things are going well, can we reduce the frequency of visits. I was just slightly shocked to be told "...things are going really well - see you in three months, you untrustworthy scumbag !! " (note : recall of verbal exchange may not be accurate)

                        I'm aware of legal entitlements for the landlord demanding an inspection, and also mine in refusing. If i the relationship ever deteriorated down to that, I'd look to leave at the first available oppurtunity, my issue is with both parties being reasonable without having to resort to legal requirements, and therefore should probably be addressed to the EA and the LL. If someone is, and has in the past, proving to be a good tenant who always pays on time and looks after your property, I think you should afford them the respect they deserve

                        Ta
                        Nick

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by MrShed View Post
                          Why be SO against a landlord checking out his 6 figure investment?
                          Its the banks 6 figure investment, for at least 25 years.
                          I'm not against them inspecting, and in reality would allow the quarterly visits, but IMO its unreasonable, and shows a lack of respect. When taking up the maintenance agreement with the EA, the LL will be told, "don't worry, we vet all tenants, and we'll be in there every 3 months checking they're not digging holes and cooking in the floor"

                          The LL is hardly going to object, is he? Its in his interest to have as many visits as possible. Is it reasonable after successfull inspections and prompt rent payments though? I dont think so

                          The EA is contractually obliged to the LL to carry out these inspections as they promised to keep the scum in check, I think this is unfair in instances of obviously reliable tenants, why sour the relationship? the person who moves in after I leave through anger could be a real a$%£hole, or a family of 6 whose kids draw on the walls and carpet, playing music and annoying the neighbours, rather than repairing their TV as I have !!

                          Nick

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by nick.. View Post
                            Its the banks 6 figure investment, for at least 25 years.

                            An interesting thought, yet completely wrong. Even if you could argue a mortgage was the banks investment, which it clearly isn't(the bank's 'investment' is in the mortgagee paying the money back, not in the property), a lot of landlords own property outright.

                            I think this is unfair in instances of obviously reliable tenants, why sour the relationship?
                            There is no such thing as an "obviously reliable tenant".
                            Any posts by myself are my opinion ONLY. They should never be taken as correct or factual without confirmation from a legal professional. All information is given without prejudice or liability.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by MrShed View Post
                              There is no such thing as an "obviously reliable tenant".
                              Yep, far better off to assume everyones trying to screw you over. That makes for pleasant living conditions all round

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              • Deposit at the end of AST. Also, quiet enjoyment.
                                scooter08
                                Q1 – Where is the rented property located (England / Wales / Scotland / N Ireland)?
                                England

                                Q2 – What type of Tenancy Agreement (TA) is this e.g. sole tenant / multiple tenant / room only?
                                AST

                                Q3 – What date did current TA start dd/mm/yy?
                                12/04/2015
                                ...
                                21-07-2017, 15:06 PM
                              • Reply to Deposit at the end of AST. Also, quiet enjoyment.
                                scooter08
                                Thanks for the reply jp....
                                21-07-2017, 18:32 PM
                              • Reply to Deposit at the end of AST. Also, quiet enjoyment.
                                jpkeates
                                Makes sense - if the tenancy agreement doesn't say you have to let him and a surveyor in, his only right of access is with 24 hours written notice for the purpose of viewing the "condition and state of repair" of the property.

                                So you can simply decline or make your point.
                                ...
                                21-07-2017, 18:23 PM
                              • Reply to Deposit at the end of AST. Also, quiet enjoyment.
                                scooter08
                                I'm not trying to claim for breach of quiet enjoyment. He wants to be in again with a surveyor to use his property as security for something. I am going to let him I just want to remind him and have all the facts. Sorry if I didn't explain it right.

                                Only claiming for the non protection...
                                21-07-2017, 18:08 PM
                              • Reply to Deposit at the end of AST. Also, quiet enjoyment.
                                scooter08
                                I pay the council tax, yes it is mortgaged. As far as I know he isn't pretending to live him and his family live in another house a few streets away....
                                21-07-2017, 18:01 PM
                              • HMO under Commercial Lease & homeowner wants to sell
                                bald555
                                Long story short, someone I know (not close) needed money, I gave him 12 months reduced rent upfront to help him out and put a commercial lease on his HMo with right to sublet etc (my tenants).

                                Few months in and his money problems are worse and the bank (and others) pressuring him to sell...
                                21-07-2017, 16:58 PM
                              • Reply to HMO under Commercial Lease & homeowner wants to sell
                                bald555
                                and yes, there is a mortgage...
                                21-07-2017, 17:44 PM
                              • Reply to Deposit at the end of AST. Also, quiet enjoyment.
                                jpkeates
                                Harassment is way more than a breach of quiet enjoyment, there has to be a level of distress in the harassed person.

                                A retrospective claim for breach of quiet enjoyment is probably a non-starter - breach of quiet enjoyment is part of the kitchen sink people throw when they're claiming compensation...
                                21-07-2017, 17:43 PM
                              • Reply to Deposit at the end of AST. Also, quiet enjoyment.
                                Wright76
                                And although as jpkeates suggests you have a right to turn them away and force a court order, this does not mean they have breached your right to quiet enjoyment.

                                It means you are refusing to honour your AST and the landlord Is forced to apply to court to make you legally comply. Again,...
                                21-07-2017, 17:35 PM
                              • Reply to HMO under Commercial Lease & homeowner wants to sell
                                bald555
                                Many thanks for the reply. Yes, my company has leased the HMO in question under commercial lease but it's not registered at land registry as it's only a 12 month lease.

                                Tenants are friends so less of am issue as such but they'll be outside of their 6 months by the time of any would be...
                                21-07-2017, 17:31 PM
                              Working...
                              X