Letting residential premises to Co. (common-law tenancy)

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Letting residential premises to Co. (common-law tenancy)

    Hello,

    I have served a NTQ on the company and it has expired. The company has not handed back keys ot confirmed that they are levfing the property. I now need to make a possession claim through the court.

    What court forms do i need to complete to gain possession?

    Regards

    Crossfire

  • #2
    Are the premises used for the purposes of carrying on a business?

    i.e. is it commercial accommodation?

    Comment


    • #3
      Or, if it's residential accommodation, did you let it to Co. which sub-lets it to a residential occupier?
      JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
      1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
      2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
      3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
      4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

      Comment


      • #4
        It is a residential property let to a company. The common law tenancy is in the companys name and i beleive that makes the person residing at the address a licencee.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by crossfire View Post
          It is a residential property let to a company. The common law tenancy is in the companys name and i beleive that makes the person residing at the address a licencee.
          Maybe; or, more likely, he/she could be a sub-tenant of C.
          Either way, your letting to C is governed by common-law contractual rules and not by any statute law.
          JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
          1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
          2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
          3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
          4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

          Comment


          • #6
            If i want to make a possesion order do i fill an N5 with N119? I am aware that i can not use the accelerated procedure.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by jeffrey View Post
              Maybe; or, more likely, he/she could be a sub-tenant of C.
              Either way, your letting to C is governed by common-law contractual rules and not by any statute law.
              Well, I have asked this before but...

              If I (LL) let to a company (C), who sublets to a tenant (T), how can I get T evicted in the event C defaults and I wish to let to T2?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by dominic View Post
                If I (LL) let to a company (C), who sublets to a tenant (T), how can I get T evicted in the event C defaults and I wish to let to T2?
                You as L cannot, directly at least. You terminate C's letting (by your title paramount); so subT's rights to occupy end too. SubT does have rights against C, for breach of 'quiet enjoyment' rights, but that would result only in damages payable by C to subT. C's obligation to give you vacant possession of the premises brings with it the obligation for C to procure removal of all who occupy under it.
                JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                Comment


                • #9
                  But T's tenancy cannot come to an end because it is prevented from doing so under the HA 1988....

                  Under s.5 only a court order etc can bring it to an end...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I dont think an AST agreement can be between the Company and the licencee as the company is not the landlord.

                    So...would i need to complete a possesion order form (N5)?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by dominic View Post
                      But T's tenancy cannot come to an end because it is prevented from doing so under the HA 1988....

                      Under s.5 only a court order etc can bring it to an end...
                      That will be C's problem- not yours as L.
                      JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                      1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                      2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                      3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                      4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by crossfire View Post
                        I dont think an AST agreement can be between the Company and the licencee as the company is not the landlord.
                        Wrong. You let to C. C sub-lets to subT (probably on an AST). C is subT's landlord; you are C's.
                        JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                        1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                        2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                        3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                        4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by jeffrey View Post
                          That will be C's problem- not yours as L.
                          So, I can just boot out T (who is in occupation of my property) with no consequences?

                          And your post at #8 is therefore incorrect, since the tenancy between C and T has not come to an end as would have otherwise happened by operation of law, but for s.5 HA 1988?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by dominic View Post
                            So, I can just boot out T (who is in occupation of my property) with no consequences?
                            Certainly not. You need an Order against C, compelling C to procure vacant possession against subT.
                            JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                            1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                            2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                            3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                            4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              My next clanger to inform you about is the fact that I dont have a written Common Law Contract.

                              Am I correct in believing that as long as the company has been paying monthly rent direct to me and that arrears letter have been sent to the company as well as rent statements, that would be enough to sufice as a common law tenancy?

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              • what is current requirements for smoke alarm?
                                daxu
                                Hi,
                                I have a one bed flat that is let out at the moment. I asked an electrician to change the fusebox to a consumer unit and asked him for a cost of changing my battery smoke alarm to a main conntected one.

                                What he told me is that I need two alarms, one smoke alarm and one heat alarm...
                                21-07-2017, 10:02 AM
                              • Reply to what is current requirements for smoke alarm?
                                jpkeates
                                The electrician is quoting the wrong requirements, as per Mr Shed above.

                                You need a Carbon Monoxide/Smoke detector unless there's an open fire.
                                Heat detectors are a requirement in a kitchen in an HMO.

                                You need to test the alarm on the first day of the tenancy and agree...
                                21-07-2017, 10:37 AM
                              • Claiming for protected deposit
                                mandm
                                This is an interesting one, got me into a spin.
                                Tenants signed AST but decided to leave after 6 months and 3 days (problem with moving) using the break clause in the AST. I protected the deposit using DPS (Insured) and returned the deposit minus deductions when the moved out.
                                I served the...
                                21-07-2017, 08:00 AM
                              • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
                                theartfullodger
                                You don't mention PI so should we assume you can't prove you served it?...
                                21-07-2017, 10:35 AM
                              • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
                                jpkeates
                                I don't think the solicitor is chancing their arm or that the allegation is false.
                                The tenant has identified that you didn't give them the prescribed information and the solicitor is acting on that.

                                The penalty is likely to be on the low side (1 x the deposit perhaps - even though...
                                21-07-2017, 10:35 AM
                              • Reply to what is current requirements for smoke alarm?
                                MrShed
                                What a load of rubbish this sparky is spinning to you!!

                                A single battery operated smoke alarm on a single floor is absolutely fine.
                                21-07-2017, 10:23 AM
                              • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
                                MrShed
                                To be fair, allowing DPS to send the email is even worse, as this doesnt help you prove that they received it.

                                In fairness it doesnt sound like you did in fact give them the prescribed information...
                                21-07-2017, 10:18 AM
                              • Reply to Claiming for protected deposit
                                mandm
                                Thanks Guys for your immediate response, i will write and will attach the confirmation email from the DPS to the solicitor.
                                @AndrewDod I did not send them email, DPS did, i also asked them to post the confirmation to tenants but they said due to DPA, tenants needs to request that!
                                Is there...
                                21-07-2017, 10:03 AM
                              • Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                                MrShed
                                I've just posted something on GDPR and then wondered whether it had been discussed on here before - a quick search implies its never been mentioned.

                                I thought I would raise a topic to discuss it and the implications on landlords.In effect this is a replacement of the Data Protection Act...
                                20-07-2017, 15:01 PM
                              • Reply to Discussion - GDPR and implications on landlords
                                MrShed
                                Depends on the storage provider. The other problem is though that in a disaster recovery position, they usually fail this to somewhere else, out of EU - which puts you in breach
                                21-07-2017, 09:50 AM
                              Working...
                              X