how is rent calculated if tenant leaves before end of periodic tenancy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    how is rent calculated if tenant leaves before end of periodic tenancy

    Hi All,

    I have just successfully served a possession order on my tenant who is now finally leaving on the 12th of July. The 6 month AST ran out on the 31st May and has been periodic ever since. Rent was due on the 1st of each month. Now that she is going on the 12th do I charge her for 12 days, or the whole month. If its for 12 days do I work it out by dividing the months rent by 30 or 31.

    Thanks

    Mark

    #2
    what to charge tenant soon - hopefully - departing

    Originally posted by Mark1564 View Post
    Hi All,

    I have just successfully served a possession order on my tenant who is now finally leaving on the 12th of July. The 6 month AST ran out on the 31st May and has been periodic ever since. Rent was due on the 1st of each month. Now that she is going on the 12th do I charge her for 12 days, or the whole month. If its for 12 days do I work it out by dividing the months rent by 30 or 31.

    Thanks

    Mark
    Arguably if she leaves on the 12th day you are due 11 days rent. If you get it, and possession, be happy!

    Comment


      #3
      Yes, charge 12 days. Divide monthly rent by number of days in that month then * 12

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Smiler View Post
        Divide monthly rent by number of days in that month then * 12
        No, the correct way is to divide the annual rent by 365 and then multiply by 12 days.

        Comment


          #5
          Yes, =((Monthly Rent * 12)/365)*12) is the correct formula.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by GillsMan View Post
            Yes, =((Monthly Rent * 12)/365)*12) is the correct formula.
            I cannot see how this 'formula', as set out above, adds anything at all to Mrs Mug's correct and very clear explanation.(In fact, what you have written risks confusing the issue). Please explain! What do the asterisks signify, for example? And why are there two sets of brackets?

            Do you mean that in this case, P = M x 12 /365 x D [where P is the appportioned amount of rent, M is the monthly rent and D is the number of days in the portion?]

            Then P = M x 12/365 x 12 in this case, but Mrs Mugs' version (using words) is surely much easier to follow.
            'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations

            Comment


              #7
              Yes, =((Monthly Rent * 12)/365)*12) is the correct formula.
              Except in leap year??

              Cheers!

              Lodger
              I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by mind the gap View Post
                I cannot see how this 'formula', as set out above, adds anything at all to Mrs Mug's correct and very clear explanation.(In fact, what you have written risks confusing the issue). Please explain! What do the asterisks signify, for example? And why are there two sets of brackets?

                Do you mean that in this case, P = M x 12 /365 x D [where P is the appportioned amount of rent, M is the monthly rent and D is the number of days in the portion?]

                Then P = M x 12/365 x 12 in this case, but Mrs Mugs' version (using words) is surely much easier to follow.
                Stop trolling me MTG, it's massively tedious.

                Asterisks signify multiplication, and are used in software such as Excel. It's fairly ubiquitous tbh, and I'm mildly shocked this is the first time you've come across this in, what is it now, 2010? It was just another way of confirming Mrs Mug's explanation. I was trying to be helpful ffs, just because you didn't understand my fairly basic formula, doesn't mean other people won't. Please, stop trolling me...be gone.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Blimey, if tedious posts were banned what would so many denizens of these fora & other sites do all day???

                  I liked MTG's post, as I usually like MTGs' posts..

                  Asterisks signify multiplication, and is used in software such as Excel
                  surely not "is" but "are" or "can be" ?? Not to mention "Asterisks can signify multiplication amongst other things (e.g. wild cards...)

                  (Yup, I know, they'll be hostages2fortune of similar errors in so many of my posts....)


                  Cheers!


                  Lodger
                  I am legally unqualified: If you need to rely on advice check it with a suitable authority - eg a solicitor specialising in landlord/tenant law...

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Given that MTG was unable to work out that the asterisk signified a multiplication, I highly doubt she's aware of what a wild card is (so for example in SQL it usually denotes "anything", should I have covered that base as well?).

                    What did MTG's post add? Apart from pointless post-boosting of course. And now, thanks to her snidey little comment, we're off topic yet again. Admitedly I could have just ignored so I suppose I'm to blame as well.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      OK, a bit of a clash of symbols!
                      The inescapable legal point is that the only valid way to apportion anything is on a yearly basis (however you depict this in symbols).
                      Use 365 days as the fraction's denominator, unless it's a leap year.
                      JEFFREY SHAW, solicitor [and Topic Expert], Nether Edge Law*
                      1. Public advice is believed accurate, but I accept no legal responsibility except to direct-paying private clients.
                      2. Telephone advice: see http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=34638.
                      3. For paid advice about conveyancing/leaseholds/L&T, contact me* and become a private client.
                      4. *- Contact info: click on my name (blue-highlight link).

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by GillsMan View Post
                        Given that MTG was unable to work out that the asterisk signified a multiplication, I highly doubt she's aware of what a wild card is (so for example in SQL it usually denotes "anything", should I have covered that base as well?).

                        What did MTG's post add? Apart from pointless post-boosting of course. And now, thanks to her snidey little comment, we're off topic yet again. Admitedly I could have just ignored so I suppose I'm to blame as well.
                        There was no intention on my part to do anything other than highlight the confusing nature of your post. If you dislike being 'trolled' as you call it, (although most would just call it being challenged on a point of clarity!), then please stop wasting my time telling me by private message how much you object to my contributions to this forum! There is, as you admit, no obligation to read them. Given their apparent effect on your blood pressure, perhaps you should just ignore what I contribute.

                        Perhaps that can be an end to it.
                        'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by mind the gap View Post
                          There was no intention on my part to do anything other than highlight the confusing nature of your post. If you dislike being 'trolled' as you call it, (although most would just call it being challenged on a point of clarity!), then please stop wasting my time telling me by private message how much you object to my contributions to this forum! There is, of course, no obligation to read them. Given their apparent effect on your blood pressure, perhaps you should just ignore what I put.

                          Perhaps that can be an end to it.
                          Wait a second - that PM was like last week for a start. And I sent it in private for a reason. But seeing as you're insinuating that I did the cowardly act of sending you an abusive PM, then, for the benefit of other people who didn't read it, what i actually did was refute your accusation that I was gratuitously rude; say that I found you very helpful on the forums, but also condescending and rude; and called you a valuable resource. I said that I would apologise if I was "gratuitously rude", but that I genuinely didn't think I was.

                          So get your facts straight before you refer to a PRIVATE message.

                          Nothing confusing about my original post. It simply added to something someone else said.

                          (PS - was it your intention to admit that you're trolling me because I sent you a PM?)

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by GillsMan View Post
                            Wait a second - that PM was like last week for a start. And I sent it in private for a reason. But seeing as you're insinuating that I did the cowardly act of sending you an abusive PM, what i actually did was refute your accusation that I was gratuitously rude; say that I found you very helpful on the forums, but also condescending and rude; and called you a valuable resource. I said that I would apologise if I was "gratuitously rude", but that I genuinely didn't think I was.

                            So get your facts straight before you refer to a PRIVATE message.

                            Nothing confusing about my original post. It simply added to something someone else said.

                            You seem very mixed up, as well as rude (your use of 'for ****'s sake' on the forum as well as in your pm is hardly appropriate, now is it?) However, as I said in my response, you are welcome to your opinions about me; because I have no sense of who you are, I am not affected by what you think. I would though prefer you not to tell me them by private message. For a number of reasons, it achieves nothing, really. I think we must simply agree to differ.
                            'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by mind the gap View Post
                              You seem very mixed up, as well as rude (your use of 'for ****'s sake' on the forum as well as in your pm is hardly appropriate, now is it?) However, as I said in my response, you are welcome to your opinions about me; because I have no sense of who you are, I am not affected by what you think. I would though prefer you not to tell me them by private message. For a number of reasons, it achieves nothing, really. I think we must simply agree to differ.
                              It wasn't like I was being abusive in the PM though (despite your best efforts to make it appear as though I was). Meh, you're a piece of work tbh. Don't worry, you'll not be getting any further PM's (though you could have communicated this wish in PRIVATE (maybe you should look it up as you obviously don't understand the definition of this word). Now, haven't you got another thread to ruin with a pointless comment about grammar, someone getting a saying slightly wrong, or your not being able to understand fairly basic concepts which everyone else seems to understand?

                              Sigh, if only you cut that nonsense out and stick to the helpful comments which everyone can see you have in you. Oh well, if only there was world peace! Sadly, there'll always be keyboard warriors on message forums.

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              • Reply to Choosing tenants
                                by AndrewDod
                                No you really really can ask for landlords references/statements etc on more than one simultaneously. Indeed you often must. Be transparent though....
                                07-07-2022, 14:16 PM
                              • Choosing tenants
                                by annam222
                                Hi all,
                                I advertised my flat on OpenRent (for the first time) and received 90 viewing requests in a few days (I have removed the advert now).
                                I set up an automated reply to all enquires with a list of 10 questions, then picked five potential tenants that ticked all the boxes. I called all...
                                07-07-2022, 13:09 PM
                              • Reply to Can I claim rent reduction due to building noise and landlord’s misrepresentation ??
                                by jpkeates
                                You have rights under consumer law if there were things that would have led you (or any reasonable person) to make a different purchasing decision that you were not advised of.
                                It's called a misleading omission.
                                The legislation that covers it is Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations...
                                07-07-2022, 13:52 PM
                              • Can I claim rent reduction due to building noise and landlord’s misrepresentation ??
                                by A.Renter
                                I started renting a ‘studio apartment’ (i.e. a bedsit) in January this year in a three-storey 1930s block – residents are a mix of renters and leaseholders. I am considering asking for rent reduction due to two main issues:
                                1. Upon moving in I noticed that there is no way to turn off the radiator, as
                                ...
                                06-07-2022, 16:41 PM
                              • Reply to Choosing tenants
                                by ash72
                                Based on the information, I would pick the one with the highest salary, as they will be able to afford the property and the costs of running the property. If you haven't already I would ask them why they are leaving the property they are currently renting - this provides good insight.

                                And...
                                07-07-2022, 13:51 PM
                              • Reply to Evicted and left a few bits
                                by jpkeates
                                Not unless there's a right of offset in the tenancy agreement.
                                There's no general right to offset in English law.

                                In reality, if the landlord did sell the belongings and claim the proceeds were to recover the cost of disposal (which the bailee is entitled to do), the tenant would...
                                07-07-2022, 13:45 PM
                              • Evicted and left a few bits
                                by betsy2040
                                I been evicted today and I’ve left a few bits of stuff ,

                                marble table and dining chairs , mattress 2 sofas ect ect boxes of stuff , curtains , few boxes of clothes and shoes , and sideboards and all my garden stuff

                                How long have I got to remove all this?...
                                06-07-2022, 18:56 PM
                              • Reply to Renters reform bill
                                by jpkeates
                                Magna Carta doesn't apply to us common people.

                                Your right to private property is in the Human Rights Act, though.
                                And, ironically, our best protection is likely to be the amount of property that is owned by non-UK citizens, particularly companies.
                                07-07-2022, 13:42 PM
                              • Renters reform bill
                                by flyingfreehold
                                i have just read an interesting summary of all that is proposed in the EG (Estates Gazette). As drafted it effectively brings back a form of rent control as tenants will have the right to go to First Tier Tribunal to challenge any rent increases which must be proposed by section 13 notices.
                                ...
                                04-07-2022, 16:29 PM
                              • Reply to Choosing tenants
                                by AndrewDod
                                Can't see any problem with asking for bank statements and landlord references from all of them right now. Also visit them in their current homes if possible. Don't be unfair and lead them on however - explain clearly that they are one of three possible candidates out of 90. Ask for copies of their current...
                                07-07-2022, 13:42 PM
                              Working...
                              X