unpaid Rent/deposit being claimed by estate agents/landlord

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • unpaid Rent/deposit being claimed by estate agents/landlord

    Hi all

    I was sharing a joint tenancy on a flat last year. I was working and the other tenant was receiving housing benefits. He was not paying the money he received in housing benefits to the landord nor did he pay the landlord his half of the deposit.

    The estate agents/landlord and this tenent came an arrangement completely seperate from me in which they agreed he would pay the remaining £600 of the deposit owed in monthly installments of £50 from his benefits so we could move in. This obvioulsy didn't happen and now the estate agent has come back to me requesting this money even tho I wasn't part of this agreement and paid my half of the deposit upfront. The estate agents have sent me a copy of a document signed by myself that does say the whole amount of deposit would be paid via this agreement.

    I moved out of the property as soon as I discovered what he was doing and so left the tenancy on the 1st of September 2009, with 3 months still left to run on the tenancy. The landlord had already issued an eviction notice by this time because the rent was not being paid.

    The estate agents is now contacting me regarding the £600 he owed in deposit and saying i am liable as it was a joint tenancy signed by both of us even though I paid my £800 share upfront.

    Can you please advise me as to where I stand in this situation as it was not my responsibility to make him pay the rent with his housing benefits and what I can do if the estate agents decides to go through the court, surely the benefits office will have to get involved as the tenant was committing fraud? I know this other tenent will not appear at any court case if the matter does go that far so would that get the case thrown out of court or would it all fall onto me?

    would it be easier to just make an agreement to pay the £600 to the estate agents and hope they leave it there? even though I had already paid half of everything and the other tenent commited fraud and got away with stealing thousands of pounds in housing benefits? the system is very wrong if this is the case!

    Kind Regards

    KPB

  • #2
    I would suggest that you go and see a housing officer at your local authority to get some advice, but it seems that the letting agent should be chasing you for the money.

    From your description, you admit that you owe it as much as the person who didn't pay.

    You may also owe another 3 months rent on top of that.
    Allow tenants to protect their own deposits. I want free money when they do it wrong

    Comment


    • #3
      ok but as this was a joint tenancy surely the landlord will be chasing both of us for the arrears?

      If he isnt going to turn up at court that instantly means the whole deb t falls onto me? how is that a fair system?

      I don't mind paying my share of money to resolve the situation as soon as possible but want it to be fair and legal

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by KPB01 View Post
        ok but as this was a joint tenancy surely the landlord will be chasing both of us for the arrears?
        The landlord can chase you, the other tenant, or both of you.

        Originally posted by KPB01 View Post

        If he isnt going to turn up at court that instantly means the whole deb t falls onto me? how is that a fair system?
        The landlord may not take him to court, so he wouldn't be required to turn up. It's not fair, but you signed on the dotted line saying you agree.

        Originally posted by KPB01 View Post

        I don't mind paying my share of money to resolve the situation as soon as possible but want it to be fair and legal
        I assume it's legal.
        Allow tenants to protect their own deposits. I want free money when they do it wrong

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by thesaint View Post

          You may also owe another 3 months rent on top of that.
          Not if an 'eviction notice' (I assume this means a section 8, ground 8 notice) was served before the end of the fixed term, i.e. at 9 months, which is what OP implies.

          OP, I think that you may be legally liable for your ex-housemate's pre-eviction debts, as you entered into a joint tenancy agreement with him. They are probably pursuing you (as they are entitled to) because they think it will be easier to get the money out of you than out of him or his guarantor (does he even have one?)

          It probably is not much consolation but you may be able to sue him for the money if you end up paying more than half of the costs associated with the joint tenancy - worth getting some specialist legal help on this one.
          'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations

          Comment

          Latest Activity

          Collapse

          • if we haven't signed the renewal are we still liable?
            Lexy333
            Our 6 month short term assured tenancy agreement ended on the 2nd August. We are with a reputable agency. We were invited to renew for a further 6 months back in July and were asked to email our confirmation that we wish to renew in writing. This I did. We were sent the renewal tenancy to sign. We have...
            22-08-2017, 14:00 PM
          • Reply to if we haven't signed the renewal are we still liable?
            mariner
            I would say your original AST continues as SPT.
            If now a new verbal AST, you may have a new fixed term and you cannot serve NTQ during fixed term (6 months?).
            Talk to LL directly, rather than LA.
            Why did you agree to a new AST, rather than request rolling over to SPT....
            23-08-2017, 00:30 AM
          • 6 year deposit claim
            MaliaZ
            Hi guys, I know that a tenant can claim a penalty on an unprotected deposit but I just wondered when the 6 year clock starts ticking.
            22-08-2017, 16:43 PM
          • Reply to 6 year deposit claim
            mariner
            As memory fades over time, can someone provide a 'sticky' for dates when key elements of LL&T Legislation changed? I believe Apr 2012 predates later deposit timescales.
            23-08-2017, 00:08 AM
          • NTQ during fixed term?
            vpltd
            Hi,
            Can a LL issue a valid NTQ during the six-month fixed term of an AST agreement?
            (A residential let in England.)
            VPL.
            11-08-2017, 14:53 PM
          • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
            Wright76
            It's worth noting that guidance is under part 4 where tenant obviously is given notice to end of a period and therefore apportionment would not be applicable.

            The reference to the notice to quit ending the tenancy on the notice date does not change the fact that it obviously does however,...
            22-08-2017, 23:24 PM
          • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
            Wright76
            I think thats exactly what the section I have just quoted confirms.

            And thereafter, if you choose not to accept they are leaving as a result of the section 21 you must insist on a notice to quit or await a court ordering possession (where you will be ordered to apportion anyway)
            ...
            22-08-2017, 23:13 PM
          • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
            mariner
            A lot of energy has been expended in this debate. It has been suggested a LL has no need to take Court action if T apparently vacates after receiving a s21 but with no Notice. LL cannot safely assume has vacated without Court confirmation, to avoid a T allegation of 'illegal eviction'. Equally I would...
            22-08-2017, 23:00 PM
          • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
            Wright76
            If someone could copy and paste section 21 (4) a and b (I'm really not technical!), the law seems to recognise that a tenancy CAN end as a result of a section 21 and before a possession hearing.

            21(4)b........the tenancy could be brought to an end by notice to quit given by the landlord...
            22-08-2017, 22:38 PM
          • Reply to 6 year deposit claim
            KTC
            Assuming that the money originally paid had been used as a deposit for the single tenant tenancy, then 6 years and 30 days from when the 2012 tenancy started. And... if that was a fixed term tenancy, then 6 years and 30 days for any subseqent renwal and likewise from when it went periodic.
            22-08-2017, 22:22 PM
          Working...
          X