help with s21 notice + new TA being served together

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • help with s21 notice + new TA being served together

    Hi
    Im really confused,
    its along story but basically my LL hasnt protected my bond, ive been in the property 3 years the original TA started before the deposit scheme started, but it was renewed when a new LA took over the property so it should have been protected at that point, the LL realised this and fell out with the LA, so we have moved to a new LA,
    I have had property repair issues that are finally getting sorted out and the new LA took over whilst I was battling with the previous LA to get things done, and I have refused to sign a new TA with them until everything is sorted out.

    I got a phonecall from the LL assuring me that he didnt want me to leave the property and to apologise about all the stress and confusion that was going on (he seemed a very nice man)

    some repairs have been done but Im still chasing other stuff, and I fully intend to sign a new TA with them, when I am happy with everything,which had been verbally agreed

    anyway out of the blue today I get a new 6 months AS TA sent to me, included is a sec 48, which I understand is notifying me of a new LA which is fine, but also there a 2 copies of a section 21b included, neither are signed by the LA, they are for me to sign and it states that the LA wants to claim back the property after the 21/09/10

    why have they done this,
    I understand as my bond isnt protected, the LL/LA lost there right to serve this on me
    but why include it with a TA they are very keen for me to sign? if I sign the agreement it surely still doesnt give him the right back to serve this on me does it

    are they trying to frighten me

    any help would be appreciated

    TIA

  • #2
    I doubt that they are trying to frighten you. It's just that some letting agents have a funny way of saying 'Welcome to your new tenancy'. In other words, some agents (your LL's new one is obviously one of them) routinely, mindlessly, issue a section 21 notice at the start of every AST tenancy, just in case the LL decides he wants the property back at the end of the fixed term (even when 99% of the time, he doesn't).All it means is that if the LL wants his house back and if you refuse to move out, the LL can then apply for a court order for possession (which takes some time - you would not be thrown out on the streets on the day the s21 expires).It does not even mean that the LL wants you out after 6 months - he probably doesn't even realise that the new LA has sent you it. Why not write to him and express your alarm about it? I'm sure he'll be able to put your mind at rest.

    There has been a lot of discussion on the forum about this (in my view) unhelpful practice.
    'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by mind the gap View Post
      I doubt that they are trying to frighten you. It's just that some letting agents have a funny way of saying 'Welcome to your new tenancy'. In other words, some agents routinely issue a section 21 notice at the start of the tenancy just in case the LL decides he wants the property back at the end of the fixed term (even when 99% of the time, he doesn't).It does not mean that the LL wants you out after 6 months - he probably doesn't even realise that the new LA has sent you it. Why not write to him and express your alarm about it? I'm sure he'll be able to put your mind at rest.

      There has been a lot of discussion on the forum about this (in my view) unhelpful practice.
      ah thankyou
      Im new to the forum and didnt realise there were previous discussions,
      what would suggest I search under

      am I right in thinking he cant serve it as the bond isnt in a scheme?

      Comment


      • #4
        Read this thread:

        http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums...highlight=home

        And yes, you are correct : LL's failure to protect a protectable AST tenancy deposit invalidates a section 21 notice.
        'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations

        Comment


        • #5
          Also, if you sign and date the s21 (you don't have to sign it - but in this case it will help) the day BEFORE you sign and date the tenancy agreement then it won't be valid. You don't need to tell the LA that it isn't valid on either count, simply wait until they try to use it in court proceedings for possession. This way, if you need extra time if/when that happens, you will be guaranteed at least an extra couple of months or so.

          Comment


          • #6
            thankyou for your replies

            I have another quick question,what if my LL suddenly protects my bond, does he get his rights back just like that or would it go against him that the bond wasnt protected at the correct time

            I have a verbal agreement with him that I just wouldnt pay my last months rent, because the bond I paid to the very first LA ( which didnt need protecting because the scheme didnt exsist) disappeared when that company went into administration so he doesnt actually have the money, its not like he purposly didnt put it into a scheme, he was lied to by the 2nd LA who issued the new TA who said that they had dealt with the bond issue for him

            should I get this in writing, would this stop him from suddenly protecting it to evict me

            Comment


            • #7
              Your verbal agreement is still a deposit so far as deposit protection is concerned. Your deposit is the landlords liability - it isn't your issue who holds it or who has done what to whom.

              If your landlord protects your deposit, he can then issue a valid s21 (providing he has also given you the required "prescribed information") BUT any s21 issued before that remains invalid.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Snorkerz View Post
                Your verbal agreement is still a deposit so far as deposit protection is concerned. Your deposit is the landlords liability - it isn't your issue who holds it or who has done what to whom.

                If your landlord protects your deposit, he can then issue a valid s21 (providing he has also given you the required "prescribed information") BUT any s21 issued before that remains invalid.
                wouldnt the court order take into consideration that the bond had conveniently just been protected 2 years late and then the LL seeks an eviction order?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by froglet View Post
                  wouldnt the court order take into consideration that the bond had conveniently just been protected 2 years late and then the LL seeks an eviction order?
                  No, but the court would take into consideration the fact that the s21 had been served before the deposit was protected - and throw it out. To get a court order for possession the LL would have to serve a new, correct s21, whcih as Snorkerz says, would give you some breathing space.
                  'Pause you who read this, and think for a moment of the long chain of iron or gold, of thorns or flowers, that would never have bound you, but for the formation fo the first link on one memorable day'. Charles Dickens, Great Expectations

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by froglet View Post
                    wouldnt the court order take into consideration that the bond had conveniently just been protected 2 years late and then the LL seeks an eviction order?
                    No, so long as the deposit was protected beforehand (and 'prescribed information' issued) then the s21 is valid. An s21 is Black or White, Valid or Not and the following court case will only depend on wether the s21 was valid or not. If it is valid, the judge HAS to give possession to the landlord, usually giving 14 days notice to the tenant.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      so the best thing to do is to sign the s21 notice send that back ASAP and wait until I am satisifed with the ongoing repairs and send back the TA?

                      I dont even want to sign a new agreement but the 2nd LA issued it solely in my name and the current LA are insisitng that the agreement be issued and signed by me and my partner,I suppose this is correct

                      but the s21 notice is worthless as I know for a fact that my bond wasnt protected

                      is it worth sending it back at all?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Snorkerz View Post
                        No, so long as the deposit was protected beforehand (and 'prescribed information' issued) then the s21 is valid. An s21 is Black or White, Valid or Not and the following court case will only depend on wether the s21 was valid or not. If it is valid, the judge HAS to give possession to the landlord, usually giving 14 days notice to the tenant.
                        what do you mean exactly by this?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by froglet View Post
                          what do you mean exactly by this?
                          Each scheme specifies a set of information that has to be given to the tenant - it's like a 'handbook' to your deposit. There is no set format - but here is an example of the kind of things that are included (this is DPS) https://www.depositprotection.com/We...9-6cfe30d060dd.

                          Members on LLZ are divided over how serious this is, and if it is enough to derail an s21 - but I believe it is a clear breach of the Housing Act 2004 section 215(1)(b)

                          215
                          (1)If a tenancy deposit has been paid in connection with a shorthold tenancy, no section 21 notice may be given in relation to the tenancy at a time when—
                          (a)the deposit is not being held in accordance with an authorised scheme, or
                          (b)the initial requirements of such a scheme (see section 213(4)) have not been complied with in relation to the deposit.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Snorkerz View Post
                            Each scheme specifies a set of information that has to be given to the tenant - it's like a 'handbook' to your deposit. There is no set format - but here is an example of the kind of things that are included (this is DPS) https://www.depositprotection.com/We...9-6cfe30d060dd.

                            Members on LLZ are divided over how serious this is, and if it is enough to derail an s21 - but I believe it is a clear breach of the Housing Act 2004 section 215(1)(b)
                            thankyou

                            what do you think about my best course of action for dealing with the s21 notice,should I sign and send it back even though it is worthless?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by froglet View Post
                              thankyou

                              what do you think about my best course of action for dealing with the s21 notice,should I sign and send it back even though it is worthless?
                              Yes, I would do just that. They will file it away and forget about it until the time comes for it to supposedly serve its purpose. They will submit a possession claim to the court, and you will respond to that claim with your little bombshell - blowing the possession claim out of the water. Cue a new s21 and a new possession process - but that's 3+ months worth.

                              The alternative is to draw their attention to the s21 - someone might spot the problem and correct it before it becomes an issue for the landlord.

                              Comment

                              Latest Activity

                              Collapse

                              • When do tenants' requests go too far?
                                Suzy76
                                Tenants moved in at the beginning of the year and have issued a stream of requests/demands since then, the main ones being

                                - After signing the contract but before moving in, requesting that I change the wallpaper in one room as they decided they didn't like the colour
                                - Asking to...
                                12-07-2017, 16:46 PM
                              • Reply to When do tenants' requests go too far?
                                Landlord1206
                                If you trust the tenant I would allow them to decorate upon approval. To agreed specifications and at THEIR EXPENSE. This improves the property and keeps them happy. I have had this happen, new paint colour in lounge. More difficult in your case with a new tenant so I would have said wait and see....then...
                                23-08-2017, 11:18 AM
                              • Private letting advice
                                xNicolex
                                My partner and I have recently moved into a private let with our 7 month old son.
                                now the flat was in a right state when we moved in - bathroom hadn't been cleaned, kitchen was a mess, oven absolutely caked in grease from the previous tenant (it still is, I refuse to clean it so I'm just not...
                                23-08-2017, 08:28 AM
                              • Reply to Private letting advice
                                xNicolex
                                Wannadonnadoodahl - a few of the issues were noticeable when we moved in, however the landlord reassured us they would be dealt with within a week or two, its now been 6 weeks

                                JK0 - we aren't on any benefits, we both work and have been full rent of £150 a week, which feels like robbery...
                                23-08-2017, 11:05 AM
                              • Reply to Private letting advice
                                Landlord1206
                                Not sure if you have a gas cooker or not. Either way, please check that you have a valid Gas Safe certificate. You do not mention the boiler but given the other issues, I hope this is safe for you.
                                You may wish to ask for a PAT on any electrical items.

                                Not sure why you moved in given...
                                23-08-2017, 11:02 AM
                              • TT not leaving
                                johnson13
                                A friend of mine (LL) rents his property through an agent and has asked them to get the tenant out as he's coming back to live in it. The agent served a S21 notice which is due to expire soon (we'll check, but for the purposes of this post assume that everything has been served correctly and the notice...
                                23-08-2017, 09:00 AM
                              • Reply to TT not leaving
                                Darth Wookie
                                The tenant may be 'morally' in the wrong, but is legally in the right. They have no outright legal obligation to leave at the end of the tenancy agreement, which can only be truly ended by the court. In essence, the court are the 'adjudicators' of the contract and decide whether to enforce it or not....
                                23-08-2017, 09:43 AM
                              • Reply to TT not leaving
                                jpkeates
                                The current tenancy continues until the landlord has recovered possession (or the tenant serves notice) so there's no danger of a new one coming into being accidentally .

                                The tenant is awarded costs if they lose, which is pretty standard in legal cases. If the landlord loses the case, the...
                                23-08-2017, 09:38 AM
                              • Reply to TT not leaving
                                johnson13
                                Ok, thanks. This seems to imply that the tenant is in the wrong by not leaving then.

                                The notice might as well say, "you don't have to leave when this notice expires, but you'll have a large legal bill if you don't."



                                Thanks again.

                                Is this...
                                23-08-2017, 09:19 AM
                              • Reply to TT not leaving
                                jpkeates
                                The landlord can carry on accepting rent, which is due until the tenancy ends.

                                The tenant has every right to stay, as the landlord's notice doesn't actually end the tenancy. To bring the tenancy to an end, the landlord will need to go to court. If the landlord is successful, the tenant...
                                23-08-2017, 09:12 AM
                              Working...
                              X