Taking money from deposit after tenant pulls out

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Taking money from deposit after tenant pulls out

    Hi there,
    I have a house to let and was advertised last thursday. I had a few enquiries and arranged viewings. The first lady that came wanted the property straight away and said she would be paying 6 months upfront. She didnt want to move in till the 12th April, so i said inorder to hold the house i would need a deposit. So on saturday we met her again and she gave £400 deposit.
    In the meantime i had rang another couple to say the house had gone.
    The lady then rang me sunday stating her ex husband told her she must take the 2 dogs and a cat with her.
    It clearly stated on the advert that pets were not allowed.
    So we said we could not let her the house.
    I met her last night to give her the deposit back but thought it only fair to hold £50 back to re-advertise the property.
    She said i could not do this as she hadnt signed a contract, but surely verbal contract is suffice??
    I thought £50 was very reasonable seen as she has lost me a tenant and i have to pay for re-advertising.
    She is speaking to a solicitor.
    Have i done the right thing??
    Many thanks
    Nicole

  • #2
    Unfortunately, unless the deposit receipt specified that any element of it was non-returnable then it will all be returnable.

    Comment


    • #3
      What you say, to me does some reasonable, but legally as snoker says unless you receipt say unreturnable you need to return it.

      But I would also say I think you have had a lucky escape, due to how quick they got lawyers, envolved as CAB can give this advise for free.

      There are some valid reasons why people want to pay three/six months ahead, but it never for the LL benefit and I think it more hussle. But LL see the £ sign and think their in a more secure position, but ony if they cover all the bases below and maybe more.

      1) Money laundering reasons.
      2) You always have to chase cheques.
      3) If you don't do Id, referance checks and Credit checks you don't know who they are(Fake/Stolen Cheque).
      4) Accounting is bit more of a pain.
      5) If you don't do the paper work just right, they could claim that you have taken 5+ months depoist and therefore sue you not protecting the 5+ months.
      whether this agruement would stand up in court is another matter, but would you like to fight with 15(5 months * 3) months rent at stake.

      When you give her the money back, give her own cheque back or cash back if possible.
      If you already banked it, don't give her any money back until her cheque is cleared.
      Disclaimer: What I say is either right or wrong. It may be advisable to check what I say with a solicitor. If he says I am right then I am right, unless he is wrong in which case I am wrong; but if he says I am wrong then I am wrong, unless he is wrong in which case I am right

      Comment


      • #4
        I wonder if there always was another angle? - if she had mentioned the animals at the outset you would not have seen her but introducing them after you had her money may have made you more likely to carry on and sign an AST.



        Freedom at the point of zero............

        Comment


        • #5
          Whilst the above is undoubtedly legally correct I think the practical answer may be simpler. It seems to me you can go one of three ways.

          1) Give her back the 400 because its only 50 quid and life is too short.

          2) Show her a cheque for 350 and say you can have this now if you sign this piece of paper that says this is in full and final settlement and if she refuses to sign you will see her in court and will defend the action on the basis the deposit was non returnable, you will probably lose but she may well decide that 350 quid in the hand is worth more than 400 in the bush.

          3) Return 350 quid to her and invite her to sue you for the outstanding 50 knowing that it will cost her almost that to sue you via small claims, certainly in hassle and in practice she probably won't bother.

          Comment


          • #6
            I would go with option (1) life to short and if you go to court you may have to pay costs. So give her all of it back.

            As said in the post above, I think you would have got away lightly and that Interlaken is right about the pets, but if you had agreed to let her the P, on a lie what else will she lie about.

            Have a search around the internet there are a few forms available.
            Disclaimer: What I say is either right or wrong. It may be advisable to check what I say with a solicitor. If he says I am right then I am right, unless he is wrong in which case I am wrong; but if he says I am wrong then I am wrong, unless he is wrong in which case I am right

            Comment


            • #7
              As an aside to this, what's the point of taking a deposit if it's fully returnable if either party pulls out?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by p_cas View Post
                As an aside to this, what's the point of taking a deposit if it's fully returnable if either party pulls out?
                There is no point in taking a deposit unless the landlord makes it a condition that some or all of it is non-refundable. In this instance (sorry OP) it is the landlords fault because he didn't know what his obliations were.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Thanks for all your responses. There was no receipt given as i was placing the money straight into the protection scheme, and we did clearly point out to her the deposit was to hold the house, as we had other people wanting it, and if she wanted it then she must pay this.
                  I agree with the comment about she must have known about the animals and was trying her luck with this.
                  I gave her the £350 on sunday so i suppose i will just have to wait and see.
                  I will know for next time to give a receipt stating its non refundable.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Smithy100 View Post
                    Thanks for all your responses. There was no receipt given as i was placing the money straight into the protection scheme, and we did clearly point out to her the deposit was to hold the house, as we had other people wanting it, and if she wanted it then she must pay this.
                    I agree with the comment about she must have known about the animals and was trying her luck with this.
                    I gave her the £350 on sunday so i suppose i will just have to wait and see.
                    I will know for next time to give a receipt stating its non refundable.
                    If you took the money as a tenancy deposit then it is even more clear-cut that it should have been refunded in full as there are only certain costs that can be taken from a tenancy deposit.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Snorkerz View Post
                      If you took the money as a tenancy deposit then it is even more clear-cut that it should have been refunded in full as there are only certain costs that can be taken from a tenancy deposit.
                      Are you sayimg here that even if a document was used and signed by tenant stating this deposit was being taken for property XXX on a "Non -returnable basis" that it would not have been of use to hold back a reasonable amount as in this case?
                      Chas.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Charles19 View Post
                        Are you sayimg here that even if a document was used and signed by tenant stating this deposit was being taken for property XXX on a "Non -returnable basis" that it would not have been of use to hold back a reasonable amount as in this case?
                        Chas.
                        To clarify - this was simply a holding deposit subject to the AST being finalised i.e. so it was taken to secure the property on a "non--returnable" basis BEFORE the AST was completed and a normal deposit provided for this other reason. Obviously a normal property deposit has to be returnable at end of AST.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Charles19 View Post
                          To clarify - this was simply a holding deposit subject to the AST being finalised i.e. so it was taken to secure the property on a "non--returnable" basis BEFORE the AST was completed and a normal deposit provided for this other reason. Obviously a normal property deposit has to be returnable at end of AST.
                          OP stated that the deposit was being put into a tenancy deposit scheme - hence my comments.

                          Comment

                          Latest Activity

                          Collapse

                          • Tenant's energy debt.
                            Gordonmrln
                            I am a landlord of a 2 bed end terrace, the property is owned out right. I am registered Disabled and this was the main reason I decided to rent my property out. As it was not a suitable property for my Disability. I would have to make some major changes that would devalue my property like installing...
                            20-07-2017, 22:08 PM
                          • Reply to Tenant's energy debt.
                            Gordonmrln
                            Hi there, I was wondering if anyone can help me yet again, I've just got off the phone with the debt collecting agency and I am physically shaking, I was so angry and upset I just had to come and try get some help. As You are aware I had to send them some documentation regarding my late wife's death....
                            26-07-2017, 14:26 PM
                          • Wanting/needing to leave early
                            geologist
                            I am in England and currently on a periodic tenancy 5+ years. This week I should have confirmation that I have a new AST in another country one the landlord provides a good enough reference (which they should do....I have been a great tenant). The landlord knows I am wanting to move as he, earlier this...
                            26-07-2017, 08:36 AM
                          • Reply to Wanting/needing to leave early
                            mk1fan
                            OP, I can see you point but that doesn't give you any entitlement.

                            Renting is a funny circumstance as it is the occupier's home but the owner's business asset.

                            You say you are relocating. Would you relocate if your new employer said they would only make their mind up to employ...
                            26-07-2017, 14:18 PM
                          • Tips for making a good impression when meeting a landlord
                            purpleangel
                            Our potential new landlady has 'approved us in principle' but wants to meet us at the house as the final part in the referencing process. Beside the obvious such as look smart, tidy and professional and warn the kids to behave, any particular tips for making sure this last hurdle goes smoothly?
                            26-07-2017, 10:11 AM
                          • Reply to Tips for making a good impression when meeting a landlord
                            Wannadonnadoodah
                            I decided not to let to a family based on the car they turned up in. Had made my decision before they had even turned the engine off....
                            26-07-2017, 14:12 PM
                          • Reply to Wanting/needing to leave early
                            jpkeates
                            The contract term is there for a reason - to allow access to override the general principle of quiet enjoyment.
                            It's not a question of priority (although it would be more helpful if the terms of access were clearer - or not, lots of contracts consent to viewings in the last month of the tenancy,...
                            26-07-2017, 14:09 PM
                          • Mice in the flat - what to do?
                            JP23
                            We have had mice for a while now. There's only one or two that we see (we're not overrun) but still, they've left urine stains in our cupboard and behind the skirting it's ridiculously filthy and soiled.

                            Are we legally able to pay for a cleaner then subtract it from our rent next month...
                            26-07-2017, 06:02 AM
                          • Reply to Mice in the flat - what to do?
                            jpkeates
                            That isn't an actual law - it's Shelter's view of the duties of a landlord.
                            It isn't as black and white as that - life would be simpler if it was.

                            Your view that there have been mice in the property before isn't any evidence that they were there when you moved in.
                            If the neighbours...
                            26-07-2017, 14:04 PM
                          • Reply to Mice in the flat - what to do?
                            JP23
                            This is the most helpful response, thank you....
                            26-07-2017, 13:51 PM
                          Working...
                          X