Can Proof of posting be a 100% proof of service?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Can Proof of posting be a 100% proof of service?

    Proof of posting, is free, the tenant cannot reject the letter, or even if they are out it arrives. Some judges dislike it, as it does not have the signature to show actual receipt.

    I thought of entering the following text in my future AST's-:

    The Tenant hereby agrees that a ‘certificate of posting’ stamped by the post office bearing the tenants name and address shall be proof of service of the relevant document/s, and admissible in court as duly served.

    What are your views, can this help or any ammendments?

    #2
    Originally posted by zwypl View Post
    Proof of posting, is free, the tenant cannot reject the letter, or even if they are out it arrives. Some judges dislike it, as it does not have the signature to show actual receipt.

    I thought of entering the following text in my future AST's-:

    The Tenant hereby agrees that a ‘certificate of posting’ stamped by the post office bearing the tenants name and address shall be proof of service of the relevant document/s, and admissible in court as duly served.

    What are your views, can this help or any ammendments?
    I would say just from a non legal POV that the tenant can sign to agree that they agree it was posted but it would be a judge that decides if they deem it as proof of receipt as well as postage so would it make any difference ???

    I was given some advice when posting my recent formal letters to nightmare LL to post two copies , one registered and one next day delivery (from different post offices ) and to mention this in the formal letter as even if the signed for was rejected then the second would be back up and proof I made every effort.

    How that will pan out in reality is anyone guess although LL did indeed refuse to sign for the recorded but when he read the next day delivery which stated I had posted two letters he graced me with a phone call - even if it was only to tell me he was about to go bankrupt and couldn't fix anything !!

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by zwypl View Post
      Proof of posting, is free, the tenant cannot reject the letter, or even if they are out it arrives. Some judges dislike it, as it does not have the signature to show actual receipt.

      I thought of entering the following text in my future AST's-:

      The Tenant hereby agrees that a ‘certificate of posting’ stamped by the post office bearing the tenants name and address shall be proof of service of the relevant document/s, and admissible in court as duly served.

      What are your views, can this help or any ammendments?
      What's to prove the envelope wasn't empty?

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by zwypl View Post
        Proof of posting, is free, the tenant cannot reject the letter, or even if they are out it arrives. Some judges dislike it, as it does not have the signature to show actual receipt.
        Are you saying you have direct experience of more than one judge refusing to accept a certificate of posting as proof of delivery?

        This seems highly unlikely to me, as HM Courts serve civil claims, for example, by standard first class post - i.e. not a signed-for service - and those claims are deemed to be served. (If they did use a signed-for service, think of how many people would refuse to sign for delivery).

        I would suggest that, if you are worried about it, send two identical copies of a letter from two different post offices with a certificate of posting. A judge could not fail to believe that at least one of the letters arrived.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by zwypl View Post
          Proof of posting, is free, the tenant cannot reject the letter, or even if they are out it arrives. Some judges dislike it, as it does not have the signature to show actual receipt.

          I thought of entering the following text in my future AST's-:

          The Tenant hereby agrees that a ‘certificate of posting’ stamped by the post office bearing the tenants name and address shall be proof of service of the relevant document/s, and admissible in court as duly served.

          What are your views, can this help or any ammendments?
          In my opinion, I dont think this would help. The court would be trying to determine whether Notice was served (and deemed received).

          Proof of Posting just shows that you put a particular letter in the post on a particular date. To memory, it doesn't usually show the recipient's details either. What you ideally need is somekind of proof of delivery such as recorded signed for or a variation of some such. The problem is, something sent does not necessarily mean that it was received.

          Other users have suggested posting two copies of something with the Court likely to conclude that it is probably that at least one of the letters reached the recipient and I think this may be your best bet.

          I wouldnt worry too much about proving what was inside the enveloppe. If you are trying to prove that you served a Notice and you are able to show that you sent something to the recipient in or around the dates claimed, it shouldn't be too much a stretch of the imagination to guess what was inside the enveloppe....

          Just my two cents...

          SF

          Comment

          Latest Activity

          Collapse

          • Reply to Are they my lodgers or tenants?
            by theartfullodger
            Tenants. Moving back in won't change that.

            How many occupants do you have please?
            06-12-2021, 22:53 PM
          • Are they my lodgers or tenants?
            by Livingonaprayer
            Hi all.
            I bought a house, lived in it for a few months, then had friends ask me if they could move in as had to leave their property and were struggling to find somewhere with their dog. I agreed and drew up lodging agreement and they moved in.
            Unfortunately our dogs did not get on, and...
            06-12-2021, 20:46 PM
          • Reply to Am I a lodger or a tenant?
            by AndrewDod
            If that were so straightforwardly the case then I would easily be able to a secure a tenancy for my friend's daughter (D) who has zero credit rating, and zero ability to pay rent.

            I would take a 6M tenancy myself, immediately grant a 4 year tenancy at quarter my original rent to D, let...
            06-12-2021, 21:53 PM
          • Am I a lodger or a tenant?
            by Bert1e
            Hello, I have a question about my legal status in private rented accommodation.

            I live in a private rented house. The entire house is rented from the landlord by one individual (let's call her Sara). Sara has a bedroom in the house and a lot of stuff in the cupboards all around the house....
            28-11-2021, 12:13 PM
          • Reply to Tenancy issues - No Deposit Scheme, demanding deposit back
            by alice123
            I'm sorry you are in this situation , from what i have heard from someone these 'no win no fee' type of 'solicitors' take a massive chunk out of any claim for their own fees , which would leave your tenant with rather less money that he/she would have anticipated.

            One of the reasons why...
            06-12-2021, 21:13 PM
          • Tenancy issues - No Deposit Scheme, demanding deposit back
            by llplug
            I am a private landlord who has not put tenants deposit into Deposit scheme - I now understand the errors of my ways, put my hand up, my fault, been lax

            Tenant has had a number of minor issues (sink drainage, plug not working, bedroom light not working) which I have made an effort to rectify,...
            19-11-2021, 15:49 PM
          • Reply to Am I a lodger or a tenant?
            by KTC
            The term lawful here applies to private landlord. It's a term that does not just exist within the Housing Act 1988, but also Rent Act 1977, and probably other places. In this context, it basically means as the Shelter page summarised, did the mesne tenant have permission to sublet. That section of the...
            06-12-2021, 21:11 PM
          • Reply to Accelerated possession order
            by Hudson01
            This is a good point..... also, not wishing to tempt fate, but with the increase in Covid type restrictions is it beyond thinking that we may have another xmas ban on evictions ???? I do not believe it is needed but you know what the lefties are like....
            06-12-2021, 21:01 PM
          • Accelerated possession order
            by Pariah81
            A tenant has refused to leave the property at the end of her tenancy and has now asked to be evicted as in her words 'that will make her eligible for a council house'.

            I am sending an accelerated possession order through the courts but whilst completed the forms noticed two apparent errors...
            05-12-2021, 18:12 PM
          • Reply to Accelerated possession order
            by L4NDLORD
            this is not a great time to try to get possession, I would recommend that you tolerate them a bit longer. The Judge is not going to be sympathetic and besides these cases are going to take a long time to come to Court.
            06-12-2021, 20:55 PM
          Working...
          X