Multiple Letting Agents Dilemma

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Multiple Letting Agents Dilemma

    Hi. I recently bought a property and having refurbished it throughout - used one letting agent to market it for several weeks with no real success. I've now got it marketed with a few more agents for the maximum coverage. I've used one agent in each town (totalling 4) but I'm not sure if that's a good thing, because of its visibility on rightmove with different agents. As well as bigger exposure and getting competative rates - it also gives customers a choice of agents to use. However, does it also look desperate by doing this? The disadvantage is that I'm getting conflicting information from these agents.

    For e.g. I recently had a scenario where one agent told me that they have the 'ideal tenant' who was willing to move in a few weeks away - which was at a time when I also had other interested parties through other agents. This agent told me that by taking fees from this family, they would be committed in moving in and that if they defaulted in any way, that fee would be payable to me. This fee was said to be a holding deposit which is £250 (as the family was moving in a couple of weeks away) and the agent claims that they cannot take the 6 weeks deposit or get them to sign the tenancy agreement until the day they move in. They assured that nothing will go wrong so I told the other agents that the property had been let. A week later, they told me that these tenants failed their credit referencing (bad debts, CCJ ) so that was it! They can't move in. The holding deposit turned out to be their admin. costs afterall, as the tenant didn't change their mind but simply failed their checks! The other tenants from other agents had found somewhere else by then. So, I'm left with no tenants, no money! The agents are £250 better off!!

    Another agent said that not everyone with bad credit history gets turned down by letting agents so that agent could have asked for guarantors, 6 months deposit etc. to get round this problem. Is this true? What could I have done differently to aviod losing tenants from the other agents at the time? Should I have got them all checked out first - even if it means they could be out of pocket?

  • #2
    As an agent I refuse to do joint agency. The reason is simple. I want authority to sign up tenants. Many of my competitors do not care about the landlord OR tenants. They will happily sign up a tenant, set a move in date and THEN inform the landlord. During which time other agencies have been doing viewings and possibly arranging signups.

    I manage a property that had this exact scenario - due to bad weather we were unable to do viewings (over Christmas this year) and the flat took a bit too long to refurbish. We went to do a viewing and found someone had moved in - they were actually getting out of the shower when we went in! We had kept the landlord appraised of viewing times and apparently the other agency had not told them that someone had moved in, OR the landlord was just hedging their bets by not letting the other agencies know what was going on. This agency was (Name withheld by LLZ) lettings who you would assume would be more professional but it could have been the landlords fault.
    Last edited by Editor; 16-03-2010, 11:10 AM.
    Liability statement. My liability to you is not to exceed the amount you are paying for my recommendations or advice.

    I see a bright new future, where chickens can cross the road with no fear of having their motives questioned


    Latest Activity


    • if we haven't signed the renewal are we still liable?
      Our 6 month short term assured tenancy agreement ended on the 2nd August. We are with a reputable agency. We were invited to renew for a further 6 months back in July and were asked to email our confirmation that we wish to renew in writing. This I did. We were sent the renewal tenancy to sign. We have...
      22-08-2017, 14:00 PM
    • Reply to if we haven't signed the renewal are we still liable?
      I would say your original AST continues as SPT.
      If now a new verbal AST, you may have a new fixed term and you cannot serve NTQ during fixed term (6 months?).
      Talk to LL directly, rather than LA.
      Why did you agree to a new AST, rather than request rolling over to SPT....
      23-08-2017, 00:30 AM
    • 6 year deposit claim
      Hi guys, I know that a tenant can claim a penalty on an unprotected deposit but I just wondered when the 6 year clock starts ticking.
      22-08-2017, 16:43 PM
    • Reply to 6 year deposit claim
      As memory fades over time, can someone provide a 'sticky' for dates when key elements of LL&T Legislation changed? I believe Apr 2012 predates later deposit timescales.
      23-08-2017, 00:08 AM
    • NTQ during fixed term?
      Can a LL issue a valid NTQ during the six-month fixed term of an AST agreement?
      (A residential let in England.)
      11-08-2017, 14:53 PM
    • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
      It's worth noting that guidance is under part 4 where tenant obviously is given notice to end of a period and therefore apportionment would not be applicable.

      The reference to the notice to quit ending the tenancy on the notice date does not change the fact that it obviously does however,...
      22-08-2017, 23:24 PM
    • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
      I think thats exactly what the section I have just quoted confirms.

      And thereafter, if you choose not to accept they are leaving as a result of the section 21 you must insist on a notice to quit or await a court ordering possession (where you will be ordered to apportion anyway)
      22-08-2017, 23:13 PM
    • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
      A lot of energy has been expended in this debate. It has been suggested a LL has no need to take Court action if T apparently vacates after receiving a s21 but with no Notice. LL cannot safely assume has vacated without Court confirmation, to avoid a T allegation of 'illegal eviction'. Equally I would...
      22-08-2017, 23:00 PM
    • Reply to NTQ during fixed term?
      If someone could copy and paste section 21 (4) a and b (I'm really not technical!), the law seems to recognise that a tenancy CAN end as a result of a section 21 and before a possession hearing.

      21(4)b........the tenancy could be brought to an end by notice to quit given by the landlord...
      22-08-2017, 22:38 PM
    • Reply to 6 year deposit claim
      Assuming that the money originally paid had been used as a deposit for the single tenant tenancy, then 6 years and 30 days from when the 2012 tenancy started. And... if that was a fixed term tenancy, then 6 years and 30 days for any subseqent renwal and likewise from when it went periodic.
      22-08-2017, 22:22 PM